Liberals, get your story straight on single payer – The Week Magazine
Sign Up for
Our free email newsletters
Support for single-payer health care is on its way to becoming the consensus position in the Democratic Party.
This is particularly true after the debacle of the Republican health-care effort. Not only has the debate demonstrated that Americans are perfectly fine with the idea of government-provided health coverage, it has convinced Democrats that there's no point in trimming their political sails in the hope of getting buy-in from Republicans for whatever they advocate, so they might as well go all the way. When 500 or so Democrats run for president in 2020, we'll probably see many if not most of them drop the equivocation and come right out and say they favor single payer.
But before we get there, Democrats need to take a breath and do some thinking. Do they understand exactly what it is they want to advocate for?
Consider what has been going on in California. A bill to establish a single-payer plan in the state passed the state Senate there, but it was recently pulled in the Assembly by Speaker Anthony Rendon. Democrats have a super-majority in the legislature, so why didn't they go ahead? As Rendon argued, the bill would have created massive budget problems given other California laws; for instance, the state is required to spend 40 percent of its budget on education, so it would have had to come up with hundreds of billions of new dollars even beyond what it would spend on health care. It also would have required waivers from the Trump administration to divert money currently being spent by federal programs like Medicaid, waivers which of course would not have been forthcoming (David Dayen explains all the convoluted problems the bill would have created).
Nevertheless, some on the left treated Rendon's decision like the most perfidious treason against progressive principles. RoseAnn DeMoro, head of National Nurses United and a prominent Bernie Sanders supporter, tweeted out a picture of the California flag with a knife labeled "Rendon" sticking out of the bear's back, and characterized anyone who objected to the bill as in the pocket of insurance companies. When liberal blogger Kevin Drum criticized the bill as unrealistic, NNU's communication director sent him an email saying "the name of your magazine [should] be changed from Mother Jones who actually fought for working people to Milton Friedman, which would better reflect your class sympathies."
The truth is that establishing single payer in a single state is a nearly impossible challenge when the country as a whole continues to exist within our largely private system. It's why Vermont tried to do it and then abandoned the effort, why Colorado voters rejected it at the polls last year, and why it isn't going to work in California. Nevertheless, more and more in the future, single payer is going to be treated as a litmus test by which "true" progressives can be distinguished from establishment sellouts.
In the abstract, that's not such a terrible thing health care is a vitally important issue that affects all our lives in profound ways, and it's one of the major dividing lines between the two parties. There's no reason why Democratic voters shouldn't use health-care policy as a means to judge prospective candidates, for president or anything else.
But everyone who cares about it needs a very specific and clear answer to this question: When you say "single payer," what exactly do you mean?
I suspect that many people don't actually mean single payer when they say "single payer." Liberals like myself have long lamented the fact that alone among the world's advanced industrialized democracies, the United States doesn't have a system that provides universal health coverage. We look around with jealousy at other systems that manage to cover everyone and produce health results that are equal to or better than what we get, all at dramatically lower cost. But those systems vary widely in design, and none of them are truly single payer.
In a true single-payer system, there is only one insurer, the government. It pays for all health care, and is able to use its regulatory and market power to hold prices down and take advantage of bureaucratic efficiencies. The country that comes closest to single payer is Great Britain, with its National Health Service. You might recall that Britons are so proud of the NHS that the opening ceremony of the 2012 London Olympics included a tribute to it.
But even the British system has some private elements to it. And moving to a completely public system from our current mishmash of public and private insurance (and mostly private health providers) would require an extraordinarily costly, complex, and lengthy transition. But maybe that's fine with you you can argue that in the long run, that maximizes the benefits.
Or perhaps you would prefer a hybrid system like the one they have in France, where there's a universal government insurance program that covers everyone's basic needs, and then most people buy private but highly regulated supplemental insurance on top of it (Canada has something similar, but with much more control at the provincial level). That happens to be my preference, particularly since we can foresee a path to it from where we are now, by expanding Medicaid (which already covers almost 75 million Americans) and changing what private insurers provide but not eliminating them entirely. I think you'd have a hard time arguing that a hybrid system would be some kind of betrayal of progressive principles.
Or you might prefer a system like Germany's, where tax money goes to fund non-profit insurers ("sickness funds") that people can choose from. The point is, those are just a few of the options. Each country that has addressed this problem has come up with a slightly different solution (if you want to compare them, this is a terrific source), but what they have in common is that they all achieve universal coverage at a cost much lower than what we pay.
If we're going to remake the American health-care system and we should we're going to have to decide which of those models would work the best for us. But they're not "single payer."
I'll admit that like many people, in the past I've used the term "single payer" too loosely. And there's a rhetorical problem: We don't have a name that would refer to all the different kinds of universal health systems we might consider moving toward. It's hard to communicate what you're for in a simple and understandable way without such a name; it's much easier to say "I'm for single payer." But you probably aren't or at the very least, you're open to any number of styles of health system, so long as they cover everyone in a way that's equitable.
We're now finally approaching a point where something we call single payer can be considered politically feasible. So we'd better make sure we know what we're talking about.
More:
Liberals, get your story straight on single payer - The Week Magazine
- Canada Liberals to vote on Trudeau's successor as trade war with US heats up - FRANCE 24 English - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- The Liberals are on the verge of a remarkable comeback. Theres one thing the new leader must do to clinch a win - Toronto Star - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- The Liberals Choose a Leader in the Shadow of Trumps Threats - The New York Times - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Liberals to turn the page on the Justin Trudeau era as party selects successor - CTV News - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Tesla, Inc. (TSLA): Jim Cramer Warns Liberals Arent Buying Their Cars! - Yahoo Finance - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Canada Liberals to reveal Trudeaus successor amid trade war with US - The News International - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Disgusting, Ugly Liberals Try To Smear Riley Gaines For The Dumbest Reason Possible - Outkick - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- The Liberals are about to choose the next prime minister. What happens next? - CTV News - March 9th, 2025 [March 9th, 2025]
- Canada's ruling Liberals move on from Trudeau with Trump boost - Reuters - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Liberals torch trash Gavin Newsom for launching podcast with Charlie Kirk interview - The Independent - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Canadas Liberals were heading into a crushing defeat. Then came Trump. - The Washington Post - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Carson Jerema: Free trade is dead. Someone should tell the Liberals - National Post - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Austrian liberals' vote removes last obstacle to coalition government - Reuters - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Gould hoping progressive Liberals will propel her to party leadership - iPolitics.ca - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Liberals torch trash Gavin Newsom for launching podcast with Charlie Kirk interview - AOL - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Opposition PCs hammer NL Liberals on health cuts to hit savings goal - SaltWire N.L. powered by The Telegram - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Gavin Newsom splits from California liberals and condemns transgender athletes in women's sport in chat with C - Daily Mail - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- Analysis-Canada's ruling Liberals move on from Trudeau with Trump boost - MSN - March 7th, 2025 [March 7th, 2025]
- An Emotional Torture Chamber for Liberals: 3 Writers on Trumps First Month - The New York Times - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- What conservative women know and liberals don't about happiness | Opinion - USA TODAY - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- What conservative women know and liberals don't about happiness | Opinion - Institute for Family Studies - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Liberals', conservatives' trust in US government's use of digital health data diverged during COVID - University of Minnesota Twin Cities - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- The changing face of gun ownership... Liberals reveal the bold reasons they're taking up arms - Daily Mail - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Omar El Akkad on Genocide, Complicit Liberals, and the Terrible Wrath of the West - Literary Hub - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- WA Liberals' Albany candidate Thomas Brough back in spotlight over abortion comments - ABC News - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- John Ivison: Why Conservatives say they arent sweating the Liberals Lazarus-like revival - National Post - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Liberals top Tories for 1st time in years, new Ipsos polling says - Global News Toronto - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Why White Christian Nationalists are Freaked out: Liberals are More likely to be Non-Religious than Christian - Informed Comment - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- The Week in Polling: Liberals gaining fast on the Conservatives; Canadians think Trump is serious about the 51st state; Carney not far ahead of... - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Letters to the editor, Feb. 27: One of my greatest regrets is voting for the Liberals in the last election - The Globe and Mail - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- How the shattered German Liberals will be shaped from Brussels - EURACTIV - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Preston Manning: The Liberals' disingenuous deathbed conversion in the face of Trump tariffs - National Post - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Opinion: Before electing Mark Carney as leader, the Liberals should pause for a moment of reflection - The Globe and Mail - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- New poll puts Liberals ahead of the Conservatives for the first time since 2021 - CityNews Vancouver - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- There could have been a better result Liberals regain official party status but remain in third place - iPolitics.ca - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- FIRST READING: The most telling indicator that the Liberals remain doomed - National Post - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- CPACs MAGAfest returns to rub it in the faces of DCs liberals - The Independent - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Austrian liberals join talks on forming a centrist coalition government - Reuters - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Conservatives and liberals will give free theater performance at local church - Decaturish.com - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Liberals loved this earnest Kate McKinnon moment on SNL but Lorne Michaels wasnt a big fan - New York Post - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Liberals need to take a chill pill for Trump headaches and other opinions you read most - Yahoo - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- WA Liberals endure bruising week as election race gets tough - ABC News - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Some Liberals say mistakes costing party, while others defend campaign team punching above its weight - iPolitics.ca - February 23rd, 2025 [February 23rd, 2025]
- Liberals have me worried. Their fury and stress is hurting someone. It isn't Trump. | Opinion - The Columbus Dispatch - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- The boom of in vitro fertilization in Poland after the return of the Liberals to power - Le Monde - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Jon Stewart reveals the anti-Trump insult he's sick of liberals using and warns it has lost its power - Daily Mail - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- The Guilting of the Liberals - lareviewofbooks - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Teslas Used to Be Cool. For Liberals, Now They're Anything But - Newsweek - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Michel Maisonneuve: Only an election can save Canada from the old, tired Liberals - National Post - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Inside Winnipeg Politics: Could the Liberals really win again? - Winnipeg Sun - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Letter: Canada cannot afford to re-elect the Liberals - Cowichan Valley Citizen - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Opposition MPs criticize Liberals for failing to rein in record federal spending on outsourcing - The Globe and Mail - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Federal vote intention tightens to near-tie as Liberals and New Democrats rally around Carney - Angus Reid Institute - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Meet the new Liberals. Same as the old Liberals - The Globe and Mail - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Bell: What's up Canada? Liberals could win the election, are you nuts? - Calgary Herald - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Liberals are up 7 in a month, but the Conservatives still hold a 19-point lead - inFocus with David Coletto - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Liberals will soon pick the next prime minister. Here's what candidates are promising - CBC.ca - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- You may not like Trump. But his attempts to seize the Fed contain a lesson for liberals | Leah Downey - The Guardian - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Liberals will soon pick the next prime minister. Here's what candidates are promising - MSN - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Doctor compares liberals reaction to President Trump to Americas shock after 9/11 attacks: It is affecting their lives - New York Post - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Liberals would be tied with Conservatives with Carney as leader: poll - National Post - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- For Israeli liberals, Trumps a double-edged sword - The Times of Israel - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Canadians are focused on the here and now: Darrell Bricker on what accounts for the Liberals polling resurgence - The Hub - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- GOLDSTEIN: Federal Liberals can't be trusted with the economy - Toronto Sun - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- NDP, Liberals ask integrity commissioner to probe Ford's anti-tariff trip to Washington, D.C. - Yahoo News Canada - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Conservatives still frontrunners but hemorrhaging support to Liberals: Nanos survey - CTV News - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Terry Newman: Ontario Liberals stalked by the ghost of Kathleen Wynne - National Post - February 14th, 2025 [February 14th, 2025]
- Radical rights mission is to wind up liberals - The Times - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- PODCAST: Have the Liberals given up on Sault Ste. Marie? - SooToday - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Michael Higgins: Finally, the Liberals start tackling the scourge of fentanyl - National Post - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Where are they? Liberals, Greens remain Ontario election no-shows in Windsor-Essex - Windsor Star - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Nunavut MP calls on Liberals to extend Inuit child funding program - EverythingGP - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Nunavut MP calls on Liberals to extend Inuit child funding program - pentictonherald.ca - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- Morning Update: PC Party, Liberals promise to take over LRT if they win election - CTV News - February 5th, 2025 [February 5th, 2025]
- In Israel, Even the Liberals Love Trump. This Is Why - Haaretz - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]
- FIRST READING: The Liberals' extremely low-barrier plan to pick the next prime minister - National Post - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]
- Young families grappling with the cost of living are the focus of policies announced by WA Labor and Liberals in upcoming state election - MSN - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]
- Trump should send a bouquet of flowers to the Liberals: Poilievre - CTV News - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]
- Allan R. Gregg: 1993 redux? Not necessarily. How the failing Liberals may just win again - The Hub - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]
- Letters: Liberals can't be trusted to navigate Trump's tariffs - National Post - February 3rd, 2025 [February 3rd, 2025]