William Watson: On the road to Havana The Liberals pig-headed net-zero carpolitik – Financial Post

Breadcrumb Trail Links

Committing to turn your transportation system upside down without yet having tech to manage it economically almost certainly qualifies as a category of derangement

Author of the article:

Publishing date:

We are now well past the mid-way point of 2021. (Dont say this column never delivers the facts!) Were having a federal election September 20. The results will probably be known by October 1 earlier if the number of mail-in ballots is less than predicted. Which means that even if the Liberals are returned to government, it will be 2022, and likely well into it, before any real policy gets done.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

I mention this because the Liberal platform says a re-elected Liberal government will require that by 2030 half of all passenger vehicles sold in Canada produce zero emissions, while all must be zero emission by 2035. That gives us eight years for the first target, 13 for the second.

Very helpfully for anyone interested in judging the scale of the challenge (i.e., not Liberal strategists), Statistics Canada produces data on new motor vehicle registrations by vehicle and fuel type, though only since 2017, when there were just over two million new registrations for the year. In 2018 and 2019 there were just under two million. Two million seems to be average.

Last year, which was decidedly not average, there were 1.546 million new registrations. The number for electric-battery vehicles, was 39,036, the most ever, up from 35,523 in 2019, 22,570 in 2018 and 9,079 in 2017. But that 39,036 was only 2.5 per cent of total new registrations. Or one in 40, which is some distance from one in two or, the Liberals 2035 target, one in one.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

According to StatsCan, electric-battery vehicles are the only kind that are truly zero emissions assuming the electricity charged into them is zero emissions, which in many instances it wont be. Hybrids would help the climate cause on cost and convenience terms that more Canadians would be willing to accept but of course many eco-types brook no compromise and fiercely oppose hybrids. The real zealots would outlaw personal vehicles of any kind.

The Liberals target refers to passenger vehicles, while the numbers Ive just given are for all motor vehicles. StatsCan says that last year 28,007 electric-battery passenger cars were registered out of a total of 498,031 such vehicles, which is 5.6 per cent, or one in 18. So thats a little better. But if you look at the average of new passenger-car registrations for 2017-19, its 568,000. To get electric-battery cars up to being half that, you need to increase their annual registrations to 284,000 that is, ten-fold. To get them to the full 568,000, you have to increase their yearly supply 20-fold.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

I do understand that the Americans took only eight years to get to the moon. Though we ourselves still havent been to the moon, our six-year all-out mobilization did help win the Second World War. I have no doubt that if we were in a mortal conflict with a virulent totalitarian regime and our military planners told us that, strange as it might seem, the only way we could possibly achieve victory was to carpet bomb them with functioning electric passenger vehicles, we could re-wire our economy for that task, as we did from 1939-45, and produce as many such projectiles as we needed. (Call it the Mississauga Project.)

But despite the more fevered analogies of environmentalists our current situation isnt at all like 1939-45. My guess is most Canadians are not willing to make the same sacrifices as our parents and grandparents did in defeating Hitler. Electric-battery vehicles do involve sacrifice. They dont have the range of gasoline-powered ones, they cost a lot more and they take longer to refuel, while their batteries are bulkier and heavier than a gas tank. All that may change as technology races ahead. But it hasnt changed yet. Committing to turn your transportation system upside down without yet having the technology to manage that trick economically almost certainly qualifies as a category of derangement.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Given that many if not most of us will not feel a patriotic impulse to de-commission our gas- or diesel-fuelled vehicles, Canada post-2030 may come to resemble Havana post-1959, where, unable to buy replacements, drivers squeezed decade after decade out of their big-finned, mid-century American Buicks, Chevies and DeSotos. In Havana North well drive our 2020s guzzlers for as long as we can, hoarding spare parts as if they were truffles or gold nuggets unless, as they may, the comrades in Ottawa decide sometime in the 2030s to simply outlaw internal combustion and diesel engines.

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

Whats also true is that the passenger vehicle stipulation in the Liberal proposal is a big enough loophole to drive a mini-van, crossover sport vehicle or a pick-up truck through. Theres a longstanding precedent for this kind of escape from regulation. When in the 1970s the U.S. introduced its corporate average fuel efficiency or CAFE standards, pickup trucks faced less stringent requirements than passenger cars. Its no accident that in the decades that followed, pickup trucks went from under 10 per cent of vehicle sales to over half.

In 2020, the number of newly registered vehicles that were not passenger cars was 1.225 million. If the Liberals win, expect that number to rise fast as 2030 approaches.

Financial Post

This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below.

In-depth reporting on the innovation economy from The Logic, brought to you in partnership with the Financial Post.

Sign up to receive the daily top stories from the Financial Post, a division of Postmedia Network Inc.

A welcome email is on its way. If you don't see it, please check your junk folder.

The next issue of Financial Post Top Stories will soon be in your inbox.

We encountered an issue signing you up. Please try again

Postmedia is committed to maintaining a lively but civil forum for discussion and encourage all readers to share their views on our articles. Comments may take up to an hour for moderation before appearing on the site. We ask you to keep your comments relevant and respectful. We have enabled email notificationsyou will now receive an email if you receive a reply to your comment, there is an update to a comment thread you follow or if a user you follow comments. Visit our Community Guidelines for more information and details on how to adjust your email settings.

Read the rest here:
William Watson: On the road to Havana The Liberals pig-headed net-zero carpolitik - Financial Post

Related Posts

Comments are closed.