Mediaboss Marketing

Its election time in the UK. And in between driving over peoples feet, tripping up on national TV, and locking journalists in a room, the candidates have actually found the time to release some policies.

The quickest of skims over these policies reveals that, as is traditional, libertarians have drawn the short straw. For all the different views being presented this time round (What should happen with Brexit? Whats level of immigration should Britain have? Should the state be large or very large?) theres still no party with a substantial commitment to liberty.

There are bright spots. The Liberal Democrats want to legalise cannabis and treat drug addicts like human beings (insane, I know). But for the few freedoms that get a nod, there are countless others that get the shaft.

Ill be writing about the specific parties and how they stack up for libertarians over the next couple of weeks. But in the meantime, heres a handful of the massive issues for which no party is even pretending to care about:

In June 2016, the European Union announced plans to force IT companies into removing access to online hate speech. Considering that the EU has defined hate speech to include disrespectful public discourse, and the internet doesnt really deal in respectful public discourse, thats a pretty major blow.

So, whatever else you think about Brexit, it should at least be a chance to reaffirm Britains commitment to free speech, right? Nah.

There are no signs whatsoever that a post-Brexit Britain would become a haven of free expression. The Lib Dems and the Greens want to sneak Britain back into the censorious EU. The Conservatives are responsible for bringing in Extremism Disruption Orders (EDOs), which allows the government to ban anyone who shows a lack of respect for the rule of law from using social media.

Worst of all are UKIP, who pretend to support free speech up until a meme creator or musical comedy act picks on them.

It may not surprise you to learn this, but nuclear missiles are dangerous. Really, really dangerous.

As such, theres never a bad time to have a debate about whether or not the state should keep wasting taxpayer money on potentially world-ending, outdated, dick-measuring apparatus.

Thats not the debate were having in Britain, though. The debate were having is between one side (The Conservatives) whose leader wont rule out pre-emptively nuking other countries, and another (Labour) whose leader has said hed never push the button but wants to keep spending billions on nukes anyway.

The first of those is crazily sabre-rattling. The second is mind-bogglingly wasteful. Neither is great for libertarians.

On the subject of throwing money away, the Lib Dems, Labour and the Conservatives have all pledged to meet the NATO target of spending 2% of budget on defence. Only spending 2% of a countrys money on defence might sound like a dream to American conservatives, but Britain is an island surrounded by allies. The rest of the EU clubbing together to invade Britain might be Nigel Farages greatest fear/secret dark fantasy, but its never going to happen.

To the credit of Jeremy Corbyn (the aforementioned Labour leader), hes an anti-royalist. Presumably the only reason the Queen hasnt chopped his head off for treason is because hes repeatedly said he wont campaign on getting rid of her.

Apart from that? All the other parties bloody love her. Sorry freedom lovers, democracy supporters, and people who think our nation should stop cosplaying as an enchanted kingdom, were going to be stuck with an unelected head of state for a long, long time.

Like Loading...

See the original post:
UK Elections: The libertarian issues no one is mentioning - Being Libertarian