How to Pick a Winning March Madness Bracket – Machine Learning Times – machine learning & data science news – The Predictive Analytics Times
Introduction
In 2019, over 40 million Americans wagered money on March Madness brackets, according to the American Gaming Association. Most of this money was bet in bracket pools, which consist of a group of people each entering their predictions of the NCAA tournament games along with a buy-in. The bracket that comes closest to being right wins. If you also consider the bracket pools where only pride is at stake, the number of participants is much greater. Despite all this attention, most do not give themselves the best chance to win because they are focused on the wrong question.
The Right Question
Mistake #3 in Dr. John Elders Top 10 Data Science Mistakes is to ask the wrong question. A cornerstone of any successful analytics project starts with having the right project goal; that is, to aim at the right target. If youre like most people, when you fill out your bracket, you ask yourself, What do I think is most likely to happen? This is the wrong question to ask if you are competing in a pool because the objective is to win money, NOT to make the most correct bracket. The correct question to ask is: What bracket gives me the best chance to win $? (This requires studying the payout formula. I used ESPN standard scoring (320 possible points per round) with all pool money given to the winner. (10 points are awarded for each correct win in the round of 64, 20 in the round of 32, and so forth, doubling until 320 are awarded for a correct championship call.))
While these questions seem similar, the brackets they produce will be significantly different.
If you ignore your opponents and pick the teams with the best chance to win games you will reduce your chance of winning money. Even the strongest team is unlikely to win it all, and even if they do, plenty of your opponents likely picked them as well. The best way to optimize your chances of making money is to choose a champion team with a good chance to win who is unpopular with your opponents.
Knowing how other people in your pool are filling out their brackets is crucial, because it helps you identify teams that are less likely to be picked. One way to see how others are filling out their brackets is via ESPNs Who Picked Whom page (Figure 1). It summarizes how often each team is picked to advance in each round across all ESPN brackets and is a great first step towards identifying overlooked teams.
Figure 1. ESPNs Who Picked Whom Tournament Challenge page
For a team to be overlooked, their perceived chance to win must be lower than their actual chance to win. The Who Picked Whom page provides an estimate of perceived chance to win, but to find undervalued teams we also need estimates for actual chance to win. This can range from a complex prediction model to your own gut feeling. Two sources I trust are 538s March Madness predictions and Vegas future betting odds. 538s predictions are based on a combination of computer rankings and has predicted performance well in past tournaments. There is also reason to pay attention to Vegas odds, because if they were too far off, the sportsbooks would lose money.
However, both sources have their flaws. 538 is based on computer ratings, so while they avoid human bias, they miss out on expert intuition. Most Vegas sportsbooks likely use both computer ratings and expert intuition to create their betting odds, but they are strongly motivated to have equal betting on all sides, so they are significantly affected by human perception. For example, if everyone was betting on Duke to win the NCAA tournament, they would increase Dukes betting odds so that more people would bet on other teams to avoid large losses. When calculating win probabilities for this article, I chose to average 538 and Vegas predictions to obtain a balance I was comfortable with.
Lets look at last year. Figure 2 compares a teams perceived chance to win (based on ESPNs Who Picked Whom) to their actual chance to win (based on 538-Vegas averaged predictions) for the leading 2019 NCAA Tournament teams. (Probabilities for all 64 teams in the tournament appear in Table 6 in the Appendix.)
Figure 2. Actual versus perceived chance to win March Madness for 8 top teams
As shown in Figure 2, participants over-picked Duke and North Carolina as champions and under-picked Gonzaga and Virginia. Many factors contributed to these selections; for example, most predictive models, avid sports fans, and bettors agreed that Duke was the best team last year. If you were the picking the bracket most likely to occur, then selecting Duke as champion was the natural pick. But ignoring selections made by others in your pool wont help you win your pool.
While this graph is interesting, how can we turn it into concrete takeaways? Gonzaga and Virginia look like good picks, but what about the rest of the teams hidden in that bottom left corner? Does it ever make sense to pick teams like Texas Tech, who had a 2.6% chance to win it all, and only 0.9% of brackets picking them? How much does picking an overvalued favorite like Duke hurt your chances of winning your pool?
To answer these questions, I simulated many bracket pools and found that the teams in Gonzagas and Virginias spots are usually the best picksthe most undervalued of the top four to five favorites. However, as the size of your bracket pool increases, overlooked lower seeds like third-seeded Texas Tech or fourth-seeded Virginia Tech become more attractive. The logic for this is simple: the chance that one of these teams wins it all is small, but if they do, then you probably win your pool regardless of the number of participants, because its likely no one else picked them.
Simulations Methodology
To simulate bracket pools, I first had to simulate brackets. I used an average of the Vegas and 538 predictions to run many simulations of the actual events of March Madness. As discussed above, this method isnt perfect but its a good approximation. Next, I used the Who Picked Whom page to simulate many human-created brackets. For each human bracket, I calculated the chance it would win a pool of size by first finding its percentile ranking among all human brackets assuming one of the 538-Vegas simulated brackets were the real events. This percentile is basically the chance it is better than a random bracket. I raised the percentile to the power, and then repeated for all simulated 538-Vegas brackets, averaging the results to get a single win probability per bracket.
For example, lets say for one 538-Vegas simulation, my bracket is in the 90th percentile of all human brackets, and there are nine other people in my pool. The chance I win the pool would be. If we assumed a different simulation, then my bracket might only be in the 20th percentile, which would make my win probability . By averaging these probabilities for all 538-Vegas simulations we can calculate an estimate of a brackets win probability in a pool of size , assuming we trust our input sources.
Results
I used this methodology to simulate bracket pools with 10, 20, 50, 100, and 1000 participants. The detailed results of the simulations are shown in Tables 1-6 in the Appendix. Virginia and Gonzaga were the best champion picks when the pool had 50 or fewer participants. Yet, interestingly, Texas Tech and Purdue (3-seeds) and Virginia Tech (4-seed) were as good or better champion picks when the pool had 100 or more participants.
General takeaways from the simulations:
Additional Thoughts
We have assumed that your local pool makes their selections just like the rest of America, which probably isnt true. If you live close to a team thats in the tournament, then that team will likely be over-picked. For example, I live in Charlottesville (home of the University of Virginia), and Virginia has been picked as the champion in roughly 40% of brackets in my pools over the past couple of years. If you live close to a team with a high seed, one strategy is to start with ESPNs Who Picked Whom odds, and then boost the odds of the popular local team and correspondingly drop the odds for all other teams. Another strategy Ive used is to ask people in my pool who they are picking. It is mutually beneficial, since Id be less likely to pick whoever they are picking.
As a parting thought, I want to describe a scenario from the 2019 NCAA tournament some of you may be familiar with. Auburn, a five seed, was winning by two points in the waning moments of the game, when they inexplicably fouled the other team in the act of shooting a three-point shot with one second to go. The opposing player, a 78% free throw shooter, stepped to the line and missed two out of three shots, allowing Auburn to advance. This isnt an alternate reality; this is how Auburn won their first-round game against 12-seeded New Mexico State. They proceeded to beat powerhouses Kansas, North Carolina, and Kentucky on their way to the Final Four, where they faced the exact same situation against Virginia. Virginias Kyle Guy made all his three free throws, and Virginia went on to win the championship.
I add this to highlight an important qualifier of this analysisits impossible to accurately predict March Madness. Were the people who picked Auburn to go to the Final Four geniuses? Of course not. Had Terrell Brown of New Mexico State made his free throws, they would have looked silly. There is no perfect model that can predict the future, and those who do well in the pools are not basketball gurus, they are just lucky. Implementing the strategies talked about here wont guarantee a victory; they just reduce the amount of luck you need to win. And even with the best modelsyoull still need a lot of luck. It is March Madness, after all.
Appendix: Detailed Analyses by Bracket Sizes
At baseline (randomly), a bracket in a ten-person pool has a 10% chance to win. Table 1 shows how that chance changes based on the round selected for a given team to lose. For example, brackets that had Virginia losing in the Round of 64 won a ten-person pool 4.2% of the time, while brackets that picked them to win it all won 15.1% of the time. As a reminder, these simulations were done with only pre-tournament informationthey had no data indicating that Virginia was the eventual champion, of course.
Table 1 Probability that a bracket wins a ten-person bracket pool given that it had a given team (row) making it to a given round (column) and no further
In ten-person pools, the best performing brackets were those that picked Virginia or Gonzaga as the champion, winning 15% of the time. Notably, early round picks did not have a big influence on the chance of winning the pool, the exception being brackets that had a one or two seed losing in the first round. Brackets that had a three seed or lower as champion performed very poorly, but having lower seeds making the Final Four did not have a significant impact on chance of winning.
Table 2 shows the same information for bracket pools with 20 people. The baseline chance is now 5%, and again the best performing brackets are those that picked Virginia or Gonzaga to win. Similarly, picks in the first few rounds do not have much influence. Michigan State has now risen to the third best Champion pick, and interestingly Purdue is the third best runner-up pick.
Table 2 Probability that a bracket wins a 20-person bracket pool given that it had a given team (row) making it to a given round (column) and no further
When the bracket pool size increases to 50, as shown in Table 3, picking the overvalued favorites (Duke and North Carolina) as champions significantly lowers your baseline chances (2%). The slightly undervalued two and three seeds now raise your baseline chances when selected as champions, but Virginia and Gonzaga remain the best picks.
Table 3 Probability that a bracket wins a 50-person bracket pool given that it had a given team (row) making it to a given round (column) and no further
With the bracket pool size at 100 (Table 4), Virginia and Gonzaga are joined by undervalued three-seeds Texas Tech and Purdue. Picking any of these four raises your baseline chances from 1% to close to 2%. Picking Duke or North Carolina again hurts your chances.
Table 4 Probability that a bracket wins a 100-person bracket pool given that it had a given team (row) making it to a given round (column) and no further
When the bracket pool grows to 1000 people (Table 5), there is a complete changing of the guard. Virginia Tech is now the optimal champion pick, raising your baseline chance of winning your pool from 0.1% to 0.4%, followed by the three-seeds and sixth-seeded Iowa State are the best champion picks.
Table 5 Probability that a bracket wins a 1000-person bracket pool given that it had a given team (row) making it to a given round (column) and no further
For Reference, Table 6 shows the actual chance to win versus the chance of being picked to win for all teams seeded seventh or better. These chances are derived from the ESPN Who Picked Whom page and the 538-Vegas predictions. The data for the top eight teams in Table 6 is plotted in Figure 2. Notably, Duke and North Carolina are overvalued, while the rest are all at least slightly undervalued.
The teams in bold in Table 6 are examples of teams that are good champion picks in larger pools. They all have a high ratio of actual chance to win to chance of being picked to win, but a low overall actual chance to win.
Table 6 Actual odds to win Championship vs Chance Team is Picked to Win Championship.
Undervalued teams in green; over-valued in red.
About the Author
Robert Robison is an experienced engineer and data analyst who loves to challenge assumptions and think outside the box. He enjoys learning new skills and techniques to reveal value in data. Robert earned a BS in Aerospace Engineering from the University of Virginia, and is completing an MS in Analytics through Georgia Tech.
In his free time, Robert enjoys playing volleyball and basketball, watching basketball and football, reading, hiking, and doing anything with his wife, Lauren.
Go here to read the rest:
How to Pick a Winning March Madness Bracket - Machine Learning Times - machine learning & data science news - The Predictive Analytics Times
- Interpretive prediction of hyperuricemia and gout patients via machine learning analysis of human gut microbiome - BMC Microbiology - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Machine learning-based identification of key factors and spatial heterogeneity analysis of urban flooding: a case study of the central urban area of... - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Developing machine learning frameworks to predict mechanical properties of ultra-high performance concrete mixed with various industrial byproducts -... - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Small Drones Market Trend Analysis and Forecast Report 2025-2034 | AI and Machine Learning Revolutionizing Autonomous Operations, Trade Tariffs Push... - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- When a model touches millions: Hatim Kagalwala on accuracy accountability, and applied machine learning - Dataconomy - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- New Study Uses Gait Data and Machine Learning for Early Detection of Anxiety and Depression - AZoSensors - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Machine Learning and the Evolution of Mobile Apps - CIO Applications - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Artificial Intelligence, Machine Learning, and Big Data in Thailand: Legal and Regulatory Developments 2025 - Lexology - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Karen Hao on how the AI boom became a new imperial frontier - Machine Learning Week 2025 - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Machine Learning and AI in Enhancing Image Analysis of 3D Samples - Drug Target Review - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Gartner Predicts Over 40% of Agentic AI Projects Will Be Canceled by End of 2027 - Machine Learning Week 2025 - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Explainable machine learning model for predicting the transarterial chemoembolization response and subtypes of hepatocellular carcinoma patients - BMC... - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Identification and validation of glucocorticoid receptor and programmed cell death-related genes in spinal cord injury using machine learning - Nature - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Multiclass leukemia cell classification using hybrid deep learning and machine learning with CNN-based feature extraction - Nature - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Predictive modeling and machine learning show poor performance of clinical, morphological, and hemodynamic parameters for small intracranial aneurysm... - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- A robust machine learning approach to predicting remission and stratifying risk in rheumatoid arthritis patients treated with bDMARDs - Nature - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Ultrabroadband and band-selective thermal meta-emitters by machine learning - Nature - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Machine Learning is Surprisingly Good at Simulating the Universe - Universe Today - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Machine learning-assisted multi-dimensional transcriptomic analysis of cytoskeleton-related molecules and their relationship with prognosis in... - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Machine learning combined with multi-omics to identify immune-related LncRNA signature as biomarkers for predicting breast cancer prognosis - Nature - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Comprehensive machine learning analysis of PANoptosis signatures in multiple myeloma identifies prognostic and immunotherapy biomarkers - Nature - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Enhancing game outcome prediction in the Chinese basketball league through a machine learning framework based on performance data - Nature - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- A novel double machine learning approach for detecting early breast cancer using advanced feature selection and dimensionality reduction techniques -... - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Machine learning for Parkinsons disease: a comprehensive review of datasets, algorithms, and challenges - Nature - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Cervical cancer prediction using machine learning models based on routine blood analysis - Nature - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Enhancing anomaly detection in IoT-driven factories using Logistic Boosting, Random Forest, and SVM: A comparative machine learning approach - Nature - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Predicting car accident severity in Northwest Ethiopia: a machine learning approach leveraging driver, environmental, and road conditions - Nature - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Sensormatic Solutions Adds Machine Learning to Shrink Analyzer - Ink World magazine - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Exploring the link between the ZJU index and sarcopenia in adults aged 2059 using NHANES and machine learning - Nature - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- Combining multi-parametric MRI radiomics features with tumor abnormal protein to construct a machine learning-based predictive model for prostate... - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- New insight into viscosity prediction of imidazolium-based ionic liquids and their mixtures with machine learning models - Nature - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Implementing partial least squares and machine learning regressive models for prediction of drug release in targeted drug delivery application -... - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Advanced analysis of defect clusters in nuclear reactors using machine learning techniques - Nature - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Machine learning analysis of kinematic movement features during functional tasks to discriminate chronic neck pain patients from asymptomatic controls... - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Enhanced machine learning models for predicting three-year mortality in Non-STEMI patients aged 75 and above - BMC Geriatrics - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Modeling seawater intrusion along the Alabama coastline using physical and machine learning models to evaluate the effects of multiscale natural and... - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- A comprehensive study based on machine learning models for early identification Mycoplasma pneumoniae infection in segmental/lobar pneumonia - Nature - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Identifying ovarian cancer with machine learning DNA methylation pattern analysis - Nature - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- High-isolation dual-band MIMO antenna for next-generation 5G wireless networks at 28/38 GHz with machine learning-based gain prediction - Nature - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Sony and AMD want to focus on machine learning for the PS6 - Instant Gaming News - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- How Machine Learning is Reshaping the Future of Sports Betting? - London Daily News - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- An interpretable machine learning model for predicting depression in middle-aged and elderly cancer patients in China: a study based on the CHARLS... - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- These Eight Projects Showcase the Power of Machine Learning on the Edge - Hackster.io - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Build Custom AI Tools for Your AI Agents that Combine Machine Learning and Statistical Analysis - MarkTechPost - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Check out these essential tips and trends for SEO in 2025 as AI and machine learning loom large - EdTech Innovation Hub - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Using machine learning to predict the severity of salmonella infection - Open Access Government - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- How AI and machine learning are transforming drug discovery - Pharmaceutical Technology - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Capturing the complexity of human strategic decision-making with machine learning - Nature - June 26th, 2025 [June 26th, 2025]
- A framework to evaluate machine learning crystal stability predictions - Nature - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Machine learning revealed giant thermal conductivity reduction by strong phonon localization in two-angle disordered twisted multilayer graphene -... - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- How AI and Machine Learning Are Powering the Next Generation of Pump Maintenance - Robotics Tomorrow - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Actuate Therapeutics Reports Positive Biomarker and Machine Learning Data from Phase 2 Elraglusib Trial in First-Line Treatment of Metastatic... - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Texas A&M Researchers Introduce a Two-Phase Machine Learning Method Named ShockCast for High-Speed Flow Simulation with Neural Temporal Re-Meshing -... - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Machine learning method helps bring diagnostic testing out of the lab - Medical Xpress - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Sebi proposes five-point rulebook for responsible use of AI, machine learning - The New Indian Express - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- HAPIR: a refined Hallmark gene set-based machine learning approach for predicting immunotherapy response in cancer patients - Nature - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Machine learning boosts accuracy of point-of-care disease detection - News-Medical - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- How AI and Machine Learning Are Transforming Food Poisoning Outbreak Detection - Food Poisoning News - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Evo 2 machine learning model enlists the power of AI in the fight against diseases - Medical Xpress - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Machine learning can predict which babies will be born with low birth weights - Medical Xpress - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model for Identifying Novel HIV Integrase Inhibitors - Cureus - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- IIT launches new online certificate programme in data science and machine learning for working profession - Times of India - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Calgary startup tackles referee abuse with microphones and machine learning - Yahoo - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- New machine learning program accurately predicts who will stick with their exercise program - AOL.com - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Machine learning and generative AI: What are they good for in 2025? - MIT Sloan - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- Researchers use machine learning to improve gene therapy - Stanford Report - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- Machine learning for workpiece mass prediction using real and synthetic acoustic data - Nature - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- Analyzing the Effect of Linguistic Similarity on Cross-Lingual Transfer: Tasks and Input Representations Matter - Apple Machine Learning Research - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- Machine learning models for predicting severe acute kidney injury in patients with sepsis-induced myocardial injury - Nature - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- A machine learning approach to carbon emissions prediction of the top eleven emitters by 2030 and their prospects for meeting Paris agreement targets... - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- Augmentation of wastewater-based epidemiology with machine learning to support global health surveillance - Nature - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- Analysis of a nonsteroidal anti inflammatory drug solubility in green solvent via developing robust models based on machine learning technique -... - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- Your DNA Is a Machine Learning Model: Its Already Out There - Towards Data Science - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- Development and validation of a risk prediction model for kinesiophobia in postoperative lung cancer patients: an interpretable machine learning... - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- Predicting long-term patency of radiocephalic arteriovenous fistulas with machine learning and the PREDICT-AVF web app - Nature - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- How Machine Learning and Cascade Learning Open Doors of Advanced Automation - Supply & Demand Chain Executive - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- New Hydrogenation Reaction Mechanism for Superhydride Revealed by Machine Learning - Asia Research News | - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- AI experiences rapid adoption, but with mixed outcomes Highlights from VotE: AI & Machine Learning - S&P Global - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- IIPE introduces online M.Tech in Data Science and Machine Learning for working professionals - India Today - June 4th, 2025 [June 4th, 2025]
- Introducing Windows ML: The future of machine learning development on Windows - Windows Blog - May 19th, 2025 [May 19th, 2025]