Machine learning-guided determination of Acinetobacter density in … – Nature.com
A descriptive summary of the physicochemical variables and Acinetobacter density of the waterbodies is presented in Table 1. The mean pH, EC, TDS, and SAL of the waterbodies was 7.760.02, 218.664.76 S/cm, 110.532.36mg/L, and 0.100.00 PSU, respectively. While the average TEMP, TSS, TBS, and DO of the rivers was 17.290.21C, 80.175.09mg/L, 87.515.41 NTU, and 8.820.04mg/L, respectively, the corresponding DO5, BOD, and AD was 4.820.11mg/L, 4.000.10mg/L, and 3.190.03 log CFU/100mL respectively.
The bivariate correlation between paired PVs varied significantly from very weak to perfect/very strong positive or negative correlation (Table 2). In the same manner, the correlation between various PVs and AD varies. For instance, negligible but positive very weak correlation exist between AD and pH (r=0.03, p=0.422), and SAL (r=0.06, p=0.184) as well as very weak inverse (negative) correlation between AD and TDS (r=0.05, p=0.243) and EC (r=0.04, p=0.339). A significantly positive but weak correlation occurs between AD and BOD (r=0.26, p=4.21E10), and TSS (r=0.26, p=1.09E09), and TBS (r=0.26, 1.71E-09) whereas, AD had a weak inverse correlation with DO5 (r=0.39, p=1.31E21). While there was a moderate positive correlation between TEMP and AD (r=0.43, p=3.19E26), a moderate but inverse correlation occurred between AD and DO (r=0.46, 1.26E29).
The predicted AD by the 18 ML regression models varied both in average value and coverage (range) as shown in Fig.1. The average predicted AD ranged from 0.0056 log units by M5P to 3.2112 log unit by SVR. The average AD prediction declined from SVR [3.2112 (1.46464.4399)], DTR [3.1842 (2.23124.3036)], ENR [3.1842 (2.12334.8208)], NNT [3.1836 (1.13994.2936)], BRT [3.1833 (1.68904.3103)], RF [3.1795 (1.35634.4514)], XGB [3.1792 (1.10404.5828)], MARS [3.1790 (1.19014.5000)], LR [3.1786 (2.18954.7951)], LRSS [3.1786 (2.16224.7911)], GBM [3.1738 (1.43284.3036)], Cubist [3.1736 (1.10124.5300)], ELM [3.1714 (2.22364.9017)], KNN [3.1657 (1.49884.5001)], ANET6 [0.6077 (0.04191.1504)], ANET33 [0.6077 (0.09500.8568)], ANET42 [0.6077 (0.06920.8568)], and M5P [0.0056 (0.60240.6916)]. However, in term of range coverage XGB [3.1792 (1.10404.5828)] and Cubist [3.1736 (1.10124.5300)] outshined other models because those models overestimated and underestimated AD at lower and higher values respectively when compared with raw data [3.1865 (14.5611)].
Comparison of ML model-predicted AD in the waterbodies. RAW raw/empirical AD value.
Figure2 represents the explanatory contributions of PVs to AD prediction by the models. The subplot A-R gives the absolute magnitude (representing parameter importance) by which a PV instance changes AD prediction by each model from its mean value presented in the vertical axis. In LR, an absolute change from the mean value of pH, BOD, TSS, DO, SAL, and TEMP corresponded to an absolute change of 0.143, 0.108, 0.069, 0.0045, 0.04, and 0.004 units in the LRs AD prediction response/value. Also, an absolute response flux of 0.135, 0.116, 0.069, 0.057, 0.043, and 0.0001 in AD prediction value was attributed to pH, BOD, TSS, DO. SAL, and TEMP changes, respectively, by LRSS. Similarly, absolute change in DO, BOD, TEMP, TSS, pH, and SAL would achieve 0.155, 0.061. 0.099, 0.144, and 0.297 AD prediction response changes by KNN. In addition, the most contributed or important PV whose change largely influenced AD prediction response was TEMP (decreases or decreases the responses up to 0.218) in RF. Summarily, AD prediction response changes were highest and most significantly influenced by BOD (0.209), pH (0.332), TSS (0.265), TEMP (0.6), TSS (0.233), SAL (0.198), BOD (0.127), BOD (0.11), DO (0.028), pH (0.114), pH (0.14), SAL(0.91), and pH (0.427) in XGB, BTR, NNT, DTR, SVR, M5P, ENR, ANET33, ANNET64, ANNET6, ELM, MARS, and Cubist, respectively.
PV-specific contribution to eighteen ML models forecasting capability of AD in MHWE receiving waterbodies. The average baseline value of PV in the ML is presented on the y-axis. The green/red bars represent the absolute value of each PV contribution in predicting AD.
Table 4 presents the eighteen regression algorithms performance predicting AD given the waterbodies PVs. In terms of MSE, RMSE, and R2, XGB (MSE=0.0059, RMSE=0.0770; R2=0.9912) and Cubist (MSE=0.0117, RMSE=0.1081, R2=0.9827) ranked first and second respectively, to outmatched other models in predicting AD. While MSE and RMSE metrics ranked ANET6 (MSE=0.0172, RMSE=0.1310), ANRT42 (MSE=0.0220, RMSE=0.1483), ANET33 (MSE=0.0253, RMSE=0.1590), M5P (MSE=0.0275, RMSE=0.1657), and RF (MSE=0.0282, RMSE=0.1679) in the 3, 4, 5, 6, and 7 position among the MLs in predicting AD, M5P (R2=0.9589 and RF (R2=0.9584) recorded better performance in term of R-squared metric and ANET6 (MAD=0.0856) and M5P (MAD=0.0863) in term of MAD metric among the 5 models. But Cubist (MAD=0.0437) XGB (MAD=0.0440) in term of MAD metric.
The feature importance of each PV over permutational resampling on the predictive capability of the ML models in predicting AD in the waterbodies is presented in Table 3 and Fig. S1. The identified important variables ranked differently from one model to another, with temperature ranking in the first position by 10/18 of the models. In the 10 algorithms/models, the temperature was responsible for the highest mean RMSE dropout loss, with temperature in RF, XGB, Cubist, BRT, and NNT accounting for 0.4222 (45.90%), 0.4588 (43.00%), 0.5294 (50.82%), 0.3044 (44.87%), and 0.2424 (68.77%) respectively, while 0.1143 (82.31%),0.1384 (83.30%), 0.1059 (57.00%), 0.4656 (50.58%), and 0.2682 (57.58%) RMSE dropout loss was attributed to temperature in ANET42, ANET10, ELM, M5P, and DTR respectively. Temperature also ranked second in 2/18 models, including ANET33 (0.0559, 45.86%) and GBM (0.0793, 21.84%). BOD was another important variable in forecasting AD in the waterbodies and ranked first in 3/18 and second in 8/18 models. While BOD ranked as the first important variable in AD prediction in MARS (0.9343, 182.96%), LR (0.0584, 27.42%), and GBM (0.0812, 22.35%), it ranked second in KNN (0.2660, 42.69%), XGB (0.4119, 38.60); BRT (0.2206, 32.51%), ELM (0.0430, 23.17%), SVR (0.1869, 35.77%), DTR (0.1636, 35.13%), ENR (0.0469, 21.84%) and LRSS (0.0669, 31.65%). SAL rank first in 2/18 (KNN: 0.2799; ANET33: 0.0633) and second in 3/18 (Cubist: 0.3795; ANET42: 0.0946; ANET10: 0.1359) of the models. DO ranked first in 2/18 (ENR [0.0562; 26.19%] and LRSS [0.0899; 42.51%]) and second in 3/18 (RF [0.3240, 35.23%], M5P [0.3704, 40.23%], LR [0.0584, 27.41%]) of the models.
Figure3 shows the residual diagnostics plots of the models comparing actual AD and forecasted AD values by the models. The observed results showed that actual AD and predicted AD value in the case of LR (A), LRSS (B), KNN (C), BRT 9F), GBM (G), NNT (H), DTR (I), SVR (J), ENR (L), ANET33 (M), ANER64 (N), ANET6 (O), ELM (P) and MARS (Q) skewed, and the smoothed trend did not overlap. However, actual AD and predicted AD values experienced more alignment and an approximately overlapped smoothed trend was seen in RF (D), XGB (E), M5P (K), and Cubist (R). Among the models, RF (D) and M5P (K) both overestimated and underestimated predicted AD at lower and higher values, respectively. Whereas XGB and Cubist both overestimated AD value at lower value with XGB closer to the smoothed trend that Cubist. Generally, a smoothed trend overlapping the gradient line is desirable as it shows that a model fits all values accurately/precisely.
Comparison between actual and predicted AD by the eighteen ML models.
The comparison of the partial-dependence profiles of PVs on AD prediction by the 18 modes using a unitary model by PVs presentation for clarity is shown in Figs. S2S7. The partial-dependence profiles existed in i. a form where an average increase in AD prediction accompanied a PV increase (upwards trend), (ii) inverse trend, where an increase in a PV resulted in a decline AD prediction, (iii) horizontal trend, where increase/decrease in a PV yielded no effects on AD prediction, and (iv) a mixed trend, where the shape switch between 2 or more of iiii. The models' response varied with a change in any of the PV, especially changes beyond the breakpoints that could decrease or increase AD prediction response.
The partial-dependence profile (PDP) of DO for models has a downtrend either from the start or after a breakpoint(s) of nature ii and iv, except for ELM which had an upward trend (i, Fig. S2). TEMP PDP had an upward trend (i and iv) and, in most cases filled with one or more breakpoints but had a horizontal trend in LRSS (Fig. S3). SAL had a PDP of a typical downward trend (ii and iv) across all the models (Fig. S4). While pH displayed a typical downtrend PDP in LR, LRSS, NNT, ENR, ANN6, a downtrend filled with different breakpoint(s) was seen in RF, M5P, and SVR; other models showed a typical upward trend (i and iv) filled with breakpoint(s) (Fig. S5). The PDP of TSS showed an upward trend that returned to a plateau (DTR, ANN33, M5P, GBM, RF, XFB, BRT), after a final breakpoint or a declining trend (ANNT6, SVR; Fig. S6). The BOD PDP generally had an upward trend filled with breakpoint(s) in most models (Fig. S7).
Continued here:
Machine learning-guided determination of Acinetobacter density in ... - Nature.com
- Infleqtion Unveils Contextual Machine Learning (CML) at GTC 2025, Powering AI Breakthroughs with NVIDIA CUDA-Q and Quantum-Inspired Algorithms - Yahoo... - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Karlie Kloss' coding nonprofit offering free AI and machine learning workshop this weekend - KSDK.com - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Machine learning reveals distinct neuroanatomical signatures of cardiovascular and metabolic diseases in cognitively unimpaired individuals -... - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Machine learning analysis of cardiovascular risk factors and their associations with hearing loss - Nature.com - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Weekly Recap: Dual-Cure Inks, AI And Machine Learning Top This Weeks Stories - Ink World Magazine - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Network-based predictive models for artificial intelligence: an interpretable application of machine learning techniques in the assessment of... - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Machine learning aids in detection of 'brain tsunamis' - University of Cincinnati - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- AI & Machine Learning in Database Management: Studying Trends and Applications with Nithin Gadicharla - Tech Times - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- MicroRNA Biomarkers and Machine Learning for Hypertension Subtyping - Physician's Weekly - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Machine Learning Pioneer Ramin Hasani Joins Info-Tech's "Digital Disruption" Podcast to Explore the Future of AI and Liquid Neural Networks... - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Predicting HIV treatment nonadherence in adolescents with machine learning - News-Medical.Net - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- AI And Machine Learning In Ink And Coatings Formulation - Ink World Magazine - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Counting whales by eavesdropping on their chatter, with help from machine learning - Mongabay.com - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Associate Professor - Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning job with GALGOTIAS UNIVERSITY | 390348 - Times Higher Education - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Innovative Machine Learning Tool Reveals Secrets Of Marine Microbial Proteins - Evrim Aac - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Exploring the role of breastfeeding, antibiotics, and indoor environments in preschool children atopic dermatitis through machine learning and hygiene... - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Applying machine learning algorithms to explore the impact of combined noise and dust on hearing loss in occupationally exposed populations -... - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- 'We want them to be the creators': Karlie Kloss' coding nonprofit offering free AI and machine learning workshop this weekend - KSDK.com - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- New headset reads minds and uses AR, AI and machine learning to help people with locked-in-syndrome communicate with loved ones again - PC Gamer - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Enhancing cybersecurity through script development using machine and deep learning for advanced threat mitigation - Nature.com - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- Machine learning-assisted wearable sensing systems for speech recognition and interaction - Nature.com - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- Machine learning uncovers complexity of immunotherapy variables in bladder cancer - Hospital Healthcare - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- Machine-learning algorithm analyzes gravitational waves from merging neutron stars in the blink of an eye - The University of Rhode Island - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- Precision soil sampling strategy for the delineation of management zones in olive cultivation using unsupervised machine learning methods - Nature.com - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- AI in Esports: How Machine Learning is Transforming Anti-Cheat Systems in Esports - Jumpstart Media - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- Whats that microplastic? Advances in machine learning are making identifying plastics in the environment more reliable - The Conversation Indonesia - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- Application of machine learning techniques in GlaucomAI system for glaucoma diagnosis and collaborative research support - Nature.com - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- Elucidating the role of KCTD10 in coronary atherosclerosis: Harnessing bioinformatics and machine learning to advance understanding - Nature.com - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- Hugging Face Tutorial: Unleashing the Power of AI and Machine Learning - - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- Utilizing Machine Learning to Predict Host Stars and the Key Elemental Abundances of Small Planets - Astrobiology News - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- AI to the rescue: Study shows machine learning predicts long term recovery for anxiety with 72% accuracy - Hindustan Times - March 11th, 2025 [March 11th, 2025]
- New in 2025.3: Reducing false positives with Machine Learning - Emsisoft - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- Abnormal FX Returns And Liquidity-Based Machine Learning Approaches - Seeking Alpha - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- Sentiment analysis of emoji fused reviews using machine learning and Bert - Nature.com - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- Detection of obstetric anal sphincter injuries using machine learning-assisted impedance spectroscopy: a prospective, comparative, multicentre... - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- JFrog and Hugging Face team to improve machine learning security and transparency for developers - SDxCentral - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- Opportunistic access control scheme for enhancing IoT-enabled healthcare security using blockchain and machine learning - Nature.com - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- AI and Machine Learning Operationalization Software Market Hits New High | Major Giants Google, IBM, Microsoft - openPR - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- FICO secures new patents in AI and machine learning technologies - Investing.com - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- Study on landslide hazard risk in Wenzhou based on slope units and machine learning approaches - Nature.com - March 5th, 2025 [March 5th, 2025]
- NVIDIA Is Finding Great Success With Vulkan Machine Learning - Competitive With CUDA - Phoronix - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- MRI radiomics based on machine learning in high-grade gliomas as a promising tool for prediction of CD44 expression and overall survival - Nature.com - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- AI and Machine Learning - Identifying meaningful use cases to fulfil the promise of AI in cities - SmartCitiesWorld - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Prediction of contrast-associated acute kidney injury with machine-learning in patients undergoing contrast-enhanced computed tomography in emergency... - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Predicting Ag Harvest using ArcGIS and Machine Learning - Esri - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Seeing Through The Hype: The Difference Between AI And Machine Learning In Marketing - AdExchanger - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Machine Learning Meets War Termination: Using AI to Explore Peace Scenarios in Ukraine - Center for Strategic & International Studies - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Statistical and machine learning analysis of diesel engines fueled with Moringa oleifera biodiesel doped with 1-hexanol and Zr2O3 nanoparticles |... - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Spatial analysis of air pollutant exposure and its association with metabolic diseases using machine learning - BMC Public Health - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- The Evolution of AI in Software Testing: From Machine Learning to Agentic AI - CSRwire.com - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Wonder Dynamics Helps Boxel Studio Embrace Machine Learning and AI - Animation World Network - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Predicting responsiveness to fixed-dose methylene blue in adult patients with septic shock using interpretable machine learning: a retrospective study... - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Workplace Predictions: AI, Machine Learning To Transform Operations In 2025 - Facility Executive Magazine - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Development and validation of a machine learning approach for screening new leprosy cases based on the leprosy suspicion questionnaire - Nature.com - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Machine learning analysis of gene expression profiles of pyroptosis-related differentially expressed genes in ischemic stroke revealed potential... - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Utilization of tree-based machine learning models for predicting low birth weight cases - BMC Pregnancy and Childbirth - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Machine learning-based pattern recognition of Bender element signals for predicting sand particle-size - Nature.com - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Wearable Tech Uses Machine Learning to Predict Mood Swings - IoT World Today - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Machine learning can prevent thermal runaway in EV batteries - Automotive World - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Integration of multiple machine learning approaches develops a gene mutation-based classifier for accurate immunotherapy outcomes - Nature.com - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Data Analytics Market Size to Surpass USD 483.41 Billion by 2032 Owing to Rising Adoption of AI & Machine Learning Technologies - Yahoo Finance - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Predictive AI Only Works If Stakeholders Tune This Dial - The Machine Learning Times - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Relationship between atherogenic index of plasma and length of stay in critically ill patients with atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease: a... - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- A global survey from SAS shows that artificial intelligence and machine learning are producing major benefits in combating money laundering and other... - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Putting the AI in air cargo: How machine learning is reshaping demand forecasting - Air Cargo Week - March 1st, 2025 [March 1st, 2025]
- Meta speeds up its hiring process for machine-learning engineers as it cuts thousands of 'low performers' - Business Insider - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- AI vs. Machine Learning: The Key Differences and Why They Matter - Lifewire - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- Unravelling single-cell DNA replication timing dynamics using machine learning reveals heterogeneity in cancer progression - Nature.com - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- Climate change and machine learning the good, bad, and unknown - MIT Sloan News - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- Theory, Analysis, and Best Practices for Sigmoid Self-Attention - Apple Machine Learning Research - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- Yielding insights: Machine learning driven imputations to fill in agricultural data gaps in surveys - World Bank - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- SKUtrak Promote tool taps machine learning powered analysis to shake up way brands run promotions - Retail Technology Innovation Hub - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- Machine learning approaches for resilient modulus modeling of cement-stabilized magnetite and hematite iron ore tailings - Nature.com - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- The Alignment Problem: Machine Learning and Human Values - Harvard Gazette - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- Narrowing the gap between machine learning scoring functions and free energy perturbation using augmented data - Nature.com - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- Analyzing the influence of manufactured sand and fly ash on concrete strength through experimental and machine learning methods - Nature.com - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- Machine learning prediction of glaucoma by heavy metal exposure: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey 2005 to 2008 -... - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- Correlation of rivaroxaban solubility in mixed solvents for optimization of solubility using machine learning analysis and validation - Nature.com - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- Characterisation of cardiovascular disease (CVD) incidence and machine learning risk prediction in middle-aged and elderly populations: data from the... - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]
- Unlock the Secrets of AI: How Mohit Pandey Makes Machine Learning Fun! - Mi Valle - February 11th, 2025 [February 11th, 2025]