Mediaboss Marketing

Donald Trump has selected Federal Appeals Court Judge Neil Gorsuchto take a seat that constitutionally was President Barack Obamas to fill.

The Senate should have seated Obamas nominee, Judge Merrick Garland, and then turned to Trumps nominees as vacancies occurred. But that does not appear to be the political world America lives in, where Senate Republicans, led by Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, have stolen an open seat that would have tilted the courts balance away from a right-wing majority.

In their New York University Law Reviewarticle,The Garland Affair: What History and the Constitution Really Say About President Obamas Powers to Appoint A Replacement for Justice Scalia, Robin Bradley Kar and Jason Mazzone comprehensively review virtually every past Supreme Court nominations in our history and compile the data cited below.

There have been 103 prior cases in whichlike the case of President Obamas nomination of Judge Garlandan elected President has faced an actual vacancy on the Supreme Court and began an appointment process prior to the election of a successor, they write. In all 103 cases, the President was able to both nominate and appoint a replacement Justice.

Lets get down to some numbers that put Senate Republicans judicial coup in context.

293:Number of days Republicans stonewalled President Barack Obamas nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court before the Senate term expired.

103:Number of Supreme Court vacancies filled by elected presidents. Thats right, 103 in a row.

8:Vacancies filled during election year. Eighttimes in our history, Supreme Court vacancies occurred during an election year and the elected presidents nominees were approved.

6:Number of unelected presidential Supreme Court vacancy nominations denied.Supreme Court vacancies were denied when the sitting president was notelected: Vice President John Tylers nominations after death of President William Henry Harrison; VP Millard Fillmores nominations after the death of President Zachary Taylor; and VP Andrew Johnsons nominations after the assassination of Abraham Lincoln. President Obama was elected by the people, twice.

3:Lame-duck nominations denied.There were also three nominations made by sitting presidents post-election day, after the new president had been elected. John Quincy Adams tried after Andrew Jackson was elected; James Buchanan tried after Lincoln was elected; and President Hayes tried after James Garfield was elected. All were denied. President Obama made his nomination of Garland long before the election of Donald Trump.

84:Years since last election-year nomination. The last time there was a Supreme Court vacancy during an election year, President Hoovers nomination was approved.

9,498:Average days in the tenure of recent Supreme Court justices (since 1970).Thats right, since 1970, Supreme Court justices who have retired, had tenures averaging 26.1 years. So, this is a quarter-century: a big time decision.

1,461:The number of days Democrats should be willing to wait for the Senate to approve President Obamas rightful nomination of Merrick Garland to the Supreme Court.

1,151:Number of days Democrats will have to wait during Trumps term for Republicans to respect history and the right of every elected president to fill vacancies to the Supreme Court that occur during their term. Since Republicans have invented a new, first-time-ever, no-election-year approval precedent, Democrats will only be waiting 1,151 days

2:Number of balls and ovaries most Republicans have when it comes to something as important as the next Supreme Court vacancy. Precedent be dammed, they simply were not going to allow President Obama to appoint another Supreme Court judge that could shift the court. Period. Republicans have basically said to Democrats, when we are in charge, lets play by the rules, and when you are in charge, all is fair in love and war. Translation: our way or the highway.

Unknown: Democrat Senators with balls and ovaries.Senator Minority Leader Chuck Schumer suggested to MSNBCs Rachel Maddow, when asked about the stolen Supreme Court seat, there would be some opposition to Republican nominations, but nothing near the absolute resolve expressed by Republicans.

Will Elizabeth Warren, Bernie Sanders, Corey Booker, Al Franken and the Gang of 49 step up and start the fight for our country on the steps of the Supreme Court? Will they show the toughness that Americans respect from their leaders? (Voters care a lot more about conviction than facts and policy.) Will they say enough is enough?

The big picture: judicial coup

The Senate should approve Obamas rightful nominee, and respect 200 years of history and the last 103 nominations and the rightful balance of powers. When the next Supreme Court vacancy occurs, it becomes fair to approve one of your nominees. To be clear, Democrats arenot refusing to approve Republican Supreme Court vacancies, but they are now out of sequence and when they approve ours, we will approve theirs.

And waiting an extra 1,000 days, for a decision that will last 26 years, is not a problem. Well wait. The importance of this decision cannot be overstated.

Short of devastating Obamacare, climate legislation or World War III, this quite simply may be the biggest decision Democrats make during the Trump term. Republicans ignore history, put their boots on Democrats necks and stall a rightful nomination for 293 days, and then fully expect Democrats to bend over, start playing by the rules again and approve their nomination?

Two wrongs dont make a right, you say? You got it wrong. I am not suggesting Democrats refuse to approve a Trump nominee, when a Trump Supreme Court vacancy exists. I am simply saying, Republicans must fill the seat that is rightfully in the hands of President Obama, before that can happen. The only time in our history when an elected presidents nominations were denied, were when they were made after the new president was elected. Not relevant this time.

President Obamas pick still must be defended.

Yes, Democrats have rejected nominees.But when a nominee was rejected, the elected president always had time to make a second appointment, and the elected president always had one of his appointments approved103 times in a row. If Republicans dont like Merrick Garland, vote him down and President

Want to win back some Trump Democrats? Democratic senators can start by showing some gumption, some resolve, and some principles. History is on your side. Be tough and regain some respect in the heartland.

See the original post:
11 important numbers to remember how the GOP stole Barack Obama's Supreme Court appointment - Salon