Insurance coverage for birth control is worth discussion, but not war: Regina Brett
Is anyone else losing track of what year this is?
The calendar says 2012.
Every time I pick up the newspaper and read about the controversy over contraceptives, I swear we're in a time warp.
Why is birth control up for grabs? Didn't we settle that issue decades ago?
The controversy over abortion I can understand. We will always have people who oppose abortion. They believe it is the taking of a human life and will continue to fight for making abortion illegal.
But arguing against health care coverage for birth control?
Wouldn't those same people want as much birth control available as possible to prevent abortions?
Last month the New York Times carried this front- page story: "More than half of births to American women under 30 occur outside marriage. . . . Nearly two-thirds of children in the United States are born to mothers under 30."
And we're appalled by a 30-year-old law student who doesn't want to get pregnant?
I've always taken the position on abortion that I believe the silent majority takes: We want to honor both the unborn and the mother. We want the anti-abortion people and the abortion-rights people to work to make abortions unnecessary. Get rid of abortion by making it obsolete. Having the best access to the best birth control is a good start.
See more here:
Insurance coverage for birth control is worth discussion, but not war: Regina Brett