Media Search:



Owned Content: Lead Generation vs. Organic Visibility

If there is one thing I can most often guarantee, its that when I surf the search sphere for daily news I find articles about developing great content, how to be successful at promoting content, etc. It seems that many are hard-pressed to find that what angles and tactics will help them create that amazing, resourceful piece. However, with this topic heating up over the past few years, there is one thing forward-thinking Web teams are forgetting. What should we be doing to optimize our current content on our site that we own? The main issue I find is that sites have a wealth of content on their site but are too stingy with lead generation in mind to give way to search engine optimization benefit.

If we could bucket online marketing collateral into three groups, we would look at the three topics of Owned, Earned, and Paid. While Paid is of course the exposure we have to shell out dollars to receive, Earned media is what our brand, more specifically Owned and Paid, have built for us via user-generated content, social engagement, etc. I feel that Owned has taken a back seat to Earned as many yearn for social buzz bliss these days. Stepping back to look at all three media sections and how they may work together more efficiently, Owned is the foundation of all three and can be the catalyst for more Earned media as well as fodder for your Paid media effort. So, yes, "Owned" is a pillar we must not ignore and a great reason to rethink what we are doing with content that we own.

As a visibility obsessed SEO by trade, when first engaging an organic campaign, I find all content owned by an organization that is not visible to search engines and then ask why? The common response for gated content is, "But, we want to use our content to generate leads." Generating leads may be the main objective for a site, but we want to give search engines a little more to chew on so they can be vehicle to drive more of these "leads."

You have lead-gen content (whitepaper, webinar, etc.) linked from a page on your site. Once they click, the user is taken to a subdomain where there is a form for them to complete to receive the content. Many times I see that these form pages are on a subdomain because there is use of a marketing automation solution to house the content and for the collection of lead form data.

A given piece of content in this predicament lives on a subdomain, which does not add weight to the parent domain or take advantage the authority of the parent domain, thus leading to less of a likelihood of ranking. Every lead-generation piece should have its own page on the parent domain with a keyword-rich summary of the piece alongside a framed form submission from the third-party automation solution.

The content is gated to hold people away from the view of the content until you possess their lead data. Google will never be a lead for you, so why are you holding the content from them? With this in mind, place this content on the parent domain and allow the crawling of an entire content type. Yes, people will find the content in SERPs and get a free piece of lead-gen content. Guess what? You have them on the site now and if they liked what they got for free they will submit their information for more and may even peruse other content on your site.

You have a gated community for your customers who use your products and you have provided a forum for their discussions.

That is great that you have built a community to help customers and foster exclusivity. There is one user type you forgot to invite, though - search engines. Opening the forum to search engines and user-generated participation means that you have potentially released hundreds if not thousands of pages to search engines all containing topics that people are searching the Web for anyway.

You provide a lot of content to site users through form submission and then upon submission provide the content in a PDF download.

These PDFs are held in the arms of lead-gen greediness and in many cases the PDF folder is also provided for search crawler exclusion in the robots.txt file. Remove this exclusion and let the content be found by search engines. Yes, again, people will get free information, but provide a "like what you see" link on the PDF so that users can traverse back to the content type category page on the site so they can find other related contentand fill out a lead form.

Read this article:
Owned Content: Lead Generation vs. Organic Visibility

Google Launches Improved Sitelinks Search Box

You may have noticed a slightly new look for certain search results. That's becauseGoogle announced a new way for users to perform a site search on a website within the search results with the sitelinks search box.

This new functionality places the search box in a more prominent position and helps remove a step in the search process for users who are looking for content on a site.

From the announcement:

The functionality supports autocomplete, too, and Google says using the right markup will send the user "directly to your website's own search pages":

To implement, sites must have a working search engine function. Then, webmasters can use Schema.org markup on the home page. Google says to use the "website" entity markup with the "potential action" property of the "search action" markup.

Best practices for markup, Google says, are as follows (from theimplementation guidelines):

And some tips from Google on site-wide configurations:

Google says to head over the the Webmaster Help Forum with questions.

The Original Search Marketing Event is Back! SES Denver (Oct 16) offers an intense day of learning all the critical aspects of search engine optimization (SEO) and paid search advertising (PPC). The mission of SES remains the same as it did from the start - to help you master being found on search engines. Early Bird rates available through Sept 12. Register today!

More:
Google Launches Improved Sitelinks Search Box

Ep 1 : DayZ – The Second Amendment – Video


Ep 1 : DayZ - The Second Amendment
Today I will be discussing the right to bear arms in Dayz.

By: GeorgeAgainstTheMachine

More here:
Ep 1 : DayZ - The Second Amendment - Video

Nolan is for Second Amendment rights

Posted: Tuesday, September 9, 2014 6:00 am

Nolan is for Second Amendment rights

Stewart Mills III is trying to scare gun owners. Weve seen this trick before. Dont buy into it.

Ive been seeing some really angry mail pieces recently, accusing Rep. Nolan of not standing up for our Second Amendment rights.

An online service is needed to view this article in its entirety. You need an online service to view this article in its entirety.

To become a new online only subscriber, and have your payment automatically charged every four weeks, please choose this option. By doing so, you will first proceed to a registration form. Upon completion of the registration form you will then continue by completing the subscription form. For assistance please call (218) 262-1011. Thank you.

Please note - If you have already registered during a previous visit to this web site go to directly to the login button at the top right and then proceed to the subscription form.

To become a new online only subscriber, and have your payment automatically charged every four weeks, please choose this option. By doing so, you will first proceed to a registration form. Upon completion of the registration form you will then continue by completing the subscription form. For assistance please call (218) 262-1011. Thank you.

Please note - If you have already registered during a previous visit to this web site go to directly to the login button at the top right and then proceed to the subscription form.

To become a new print and online subscriber, please choose this option. By doing so, you will first proceed to a registration form. Upon completion of the registration form you will then continue by completing the subscription form. For assistance please call (218) 262-1011. Thank you.

View post:
Nolan is for Second Amendment rights

Coeur d'Alene Stands by Gun Ban, But It May Get Sued for Doing So

The Idaho Second Amendment Alliance is urging members on itsFacebook pageto attend several upcoming city council meetings in Emmett, Fruitland, Lewiston and Mountain Home, as part of what it calls the "Preemption Project." The post said city councils and mayors are expected to overturn ordinances that are "outdated and out of compliance with Idaho's preemption law"a law that prohibits cities from regulating firearms.

The post continues, listing cities and counties that have overturned ordinances or where "full support is expected," which include Meridian, Gem County and Twin Falls County. The organization is also chipping away at others, like Star and Nampa, but it recently had its sights set on another city: Coeur d'Alene.

When the Coeur d'Alene City Council refused to overturn laws prohibiting firearms at parades and public assemblies, the Idaho Second Amendment Alliance threatened to sue, according to KTVB. A report from the Coeur d'Alene Press said the organization lacks the legal standing to file suit on its own, but members are working with an attorney to build a case.

The organization is celebrating a recent victory in Twin Falls County, where commissioners unanimously voted to overturn their firearms ordinanceallowing guns to be carried into county parks.

See original here:
Coeur d'Alene Stands by Gun Ban, But It May Get Sued for Doing So