Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond Quantum
Noisy Intermediate-Scale Quantum (NISQ) technology will be available in the near future. Quantum computers with 50-100 qubits may be able to perform tasks which surpass the capabilities of today's classical digital computers, but noise in quantum gates will limit the size of quantum circuits that can be executed reliably. NISQ devices will be useful tools for exploring many-body quantum physics, and may have other useful applications, but the 100-qubit quantum computer will not change the world right away - we should regard it as a significant step toward the more powerful quantum technologies of the future. Quantum technologists should continue to strive for more accurate quantum gates and, eventually, fully fault-tolerant quantum computing.
[1] P. W. Shor, Polynomial-time algorithms for prime factorization and discrete logarithms on a quantum computer, SIAM Rev. 41, 303-332 (1999), 10.1137/S0036144598347011. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0036144598347011
[2] A. P. Lund, M. J. Bremner, and T. C. Ralph, Quantum sampling problems, BosonSampling, and quantum supremacy, npj Quantum Information 3: 15 (2017), arXiv:1702.03061, 10.1038/s41534-017-0018-2. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41534-017-0018-2 arXiv:1702.03061
[3] A. W. Harrow and A. Montanaro, Quantum computational supremacy, Nature 549, 203-209 (2017), 10.1038/nature23458. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23458
[4] S. P. Jordan, Quantum algorithm zoo, http://math.nist.gov/quantum/zoo/. http://math.nist.gov/quantum/zoo/
[5] A. Montanaro, Quantum algorithms: an overview, npj Quantum Information, 15023 (2016), arXiv:1511.04206, 10.1038/npjqi.2015.23. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjqi.2015.23 arXiv:1511.04206
[6] L. Grover, Quantum mechanics helps in searching for a needle in a haystack, Phys. Rev. Lett. 79, 325 (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9706033, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.325. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.79.325 arXiv:quant-ph/9706033
[7] C. H. Bennett, E. Bernstein, G. Brassard, and U. Vazirani, Strengths and weaknesses of quantum computing, SIAM J. Comput. 26, 1510-1523 (1997), arXiv:quant-ph/9701001, 10.1137/S0097539796300933. https://doi.org/10.1137/S0097539796300933 arXiv:quant-ph/9701001
[8] R. B. Laughlin and D. Pines, The theory of everything, PNAS 97, 28-31 (2000), 10.1073/pnas.97.1.28. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.97.1.28
[9] R. P. Feynman, Simulating physics with computers, Int. J. Theor. Physics 21, 467-488 (1982).
[10] D. Gottesman, An introduction to quantum error correction and fault-tolerant quantum computation, Proceedings of Symposia in Applied Matthematics 68 (2010), arXiv:0904.2557. arXiv:0904.2557
[11] S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, V. N. Smelyansky, R. Babbush, N. Ding, Z. Jiang, M. J. Bremner, J. M. Martinis, and H. Neven, Characterizing quantum supremacy in near-term devices, Nature Physics 14, 595-600 (2018), arXiv:1608.00263 (2016), 10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41567-018-0124-x arXiv:1608.00263
[12] S. Aaronson and L. Chen, Complexity-theoretic foundations of quantum supremacy experiments, arXiv:1612.05903 (2017). arXiv:1612.05903
[13] E. Pednault, J. A. Gunnels, G. Nannicini, L. Horesh, T. Magerlein, E. Solomonik, and R. Wisnieff, Breaking the 49-qubit barrier in the simulation of quantum circuits, arXiv:1710.05867 (2017). arXiv:1710.05867
[14] C. J. Ballance, T. P. Harty, N. M. Linke, M. A. Sepiol, and D. M. Lucas, High-fidelity quantum logic gates using trapped-ion hyperfine qubits, Phys. Rev. Lett. 117, 060504 (2016), arXiv:1512.04600, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.060504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.117.060504 arXiv:1512.04600
[15] R. Barends, J. Kelly, A. Megrant, A. Veitia, D. Sank, E. Jeffrey, T. C. White, J. Mutus, A. G. Fowler, B. Campbell, Y. Chen, Z. Chen, B. Chiaro, A. Dunsworth, C. Neill, P. O'Malley, P. Roushan, A. Vainsencher, J. Wenner, A. N. Korotkov, A. N. Cleland, and J. M. Martinis, Superconducting quantum circuits at the surface code threshold for fault tolerance, Nature 508, 500-503 (2014), arXiv:1402.4848, 10.1038/nature13171. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature13171 arXiv:1402.4848
[16] D. J. Bernstein, J. Buchmann, E. Dahmen, editors, Post-Quantum Cryptography, Springer (2009), 10.1007/978-3-540-88702-7. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-88702-7
[17] R. Allaume, C. Branciard, J. Bouda, T. Debuisschert, M. Dianati, N. Gisin, M. Godfrey, P. Grangier, T. Lnger, N. Ltkenhaus, C. Monyk, P. Painchault, M. Peev, A. Poppe, T. Pornin, J. Rarity, R. Renner, G. Ribordy, M. Riguidel, L. Salvail, A. Shields, H. Weinfurter, and A. Zeilinger, Using quantum key distribution for cryptographic purposes: a survey, Theoretical Computer Science 560, 62-81 (2014), arXiv:quant-ph/0701168, 10.1016/j.tcs.2014.09.018. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tcs.2014.09.018 arXiv:quant-ph/0701168
[18] S. Muralidharan, L. Li, J. Kim, N Ltkenhaus, M. D. Lukin, and L. Jiang, Efficient long distance quantum communication, Scientific Reports 6, 20463 (2016), arXiv:1509.08435, 10.1038/srep20463. https://doi.org/10.1038/srep20463 arXiv:1509.08435
[19] P. Bierhorst, E. Knill, S. Glancy, Y. Zhang, A. Mink, S. Jordan, A. Rommal, Y.-K. Liu, B. Christensen, S. W. Nam, M. J. Stevens, and L. K. Shalm, Experimentally generated randomness certified by the impossibility of superluminal signals, Nature 556, 223-226 (2018), arXiv:1803.06219, 10.1038/s41586-018-0019-0. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-018-0019-0 arXiv:1803.06219
[20] Z. Brakerski, P. Christiano, U. Mahadev, U. Vazirani, and T. Vidick, Certifiable randomness from a single quantum device, arXiv:1804.00640 (2018). arXiv:1804.00640
[21] C. L. Degen, F. Reinhard, and P. Cappellaro, Quantum sensing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 89, 035002 (2017), arXiv:1611.04691, 10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.89.035002 arXiv:1611.04691
[22] J. Preskill, Quantum computing and the entanglement frontier, 25th Solvay Conference on Physics (2011), arXiv:1203.5813. arXiv:1203.5813
[23] S. Khot, Hardness of approximation, Proceedings of the International Congress of Mathematicians (2014).
[24] E. Farhi, J. Goldstone, and S. Gutmann, A quantum approximate optimization algorithm, arXiv:1411.4028 (2014). arXiv:1411.4028
[25] J. R. McClean, J. Romero, R. Babbush, and A. Aspuru-Guzik, The theory of variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms, New J. Phys. 18, 023023 (2016), arXiv:1509.04279, 10.1038/ncomms5213. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms5213 arXiv:1509.04279
[26] D. A. Spielman and S.-H. Teng, Smoothed analysis of algorithms: why the simplex algorithm usually takes polynomial time, Journal of the ACM 51, 385-463 (2004), arXiv:cs/0111050, 10.1145/990308.990310. https://doi.org/10.1145/990308.990310 arXiv:cs/0111050
[27] Y. LeCun, Y. Bengio, and G. Hinton, Deep learning, Nature 521, 436-444 (2015), 10.1038/nature14539. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature14539
[28] T. F. Rnnow, Z. Wang, J. Job, S. Boixo, S. V. Isakov, D. Wecker, J. M. Martinis, D. A. Lidar, and M. Troyer, Defining and detecting quantum speedup, Science 345, 420-424 (2014), 10.1126/science.1252319. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1252319
[29] S. Mandr, H. G. Katzgraber, and C. Thomas, The pitfalls of planar spin-glass benchmarks: raising the bar for quantum annealers (again), Quantum Sci. Technol. 2, 038501 (2017), arXiv:1703.00622, 10.1088/2058-9565/aa7877. https://doi.org/10.1088/2058-9565/aa7877 arXiv:1703.00622
[30] T. Albash and D. A. Lidar, Adiabatic quantum computing, Rev. Mod. Phys. 90, 015002 (2018), arXiv:1611.04471, 10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015002. https://doi.org/10.1103/RevModPhys.90.015002 arXiv:1611.04471
[31] D. Aharonov, W. van Dam, J. Kempe, Z. Landau, S. Lloyd, and O. Regev, Adiabatic quantum computation is equivalent to standard quantum computation, SIAM Rev. 50, 755-787 (2008), arXiv:quant-ph/0405098. arXiv:quant-ph/0405098
[32] S. Bravyi, D. DiVincenzo, R. I. Oliveira, and B. M. Terhal, The complexity of stoquastic local Hamiltonian problems, Quant. Inf. Comp. 8, 0361-0385 (2008), arXiv:quant-ph/0606140. arXiv:quant-ph/0606140
[33] M. Jarret, S. P. Jordan, and B. Lackey, Adiabatic optimization versus diffusion Monte Carlo, Phys. Rev. A 94, 042318 (2016), arXiv:1607.03389, 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.042318. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.042318 arXiv:1607.03389
[34] A. D. King, J. Carrasquilla, I. Ozfidan, J. Raymond, E. Andriyash, A. Berkley, M. Reis, T. M. Lanting, R. Harris, G. Poulin-Lamarre, A. Yu. Smirnov, C. Rich, F. Altomare, P. Bunyk, J. Whittaker, L. Swenson, E. Hoskinson, Y. Sato, M. Volkmann, E. Ladizinsky, M. Johnson, J. Hilton, and M. H. Amin, Observation of topological phenomena in a programmable lattice of 1,800 qubits, arXiv:1803.02047 (2018). arXiv:1803.02047
[35] I. H. Kim, Noise-resilient preparation of quantum many-body ground states, arXiv:1703.00032 (2017). arXiv:1703.00032
[36] I. H. Kim and B. Swingle, Robust entanglement renormalization on a noisy quantum computer, arXiv:1711.07500 (2017). arXiv:1711.07500
[37] J. Biamonte, P. Wittek, N. Pancotti, P. Rebentrost, N. Wiebe, and S. Lloyd, Quantum machine learning, Nature 549, 195-202 (2017), arXiv:1611.09347, 10.1038/nature23474. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature23474 arXiv:1611.09347
[38] S. Aaronson, Read the fine print, Nature Physics 11, 291-293 (2015), 10.1038/nphys3272. https://doi.org/10.1038/nphys3272
[39] X. Gao, Z. Zhang, and L. Duan, An efficient quantum algorithm for generative machine learning, arXiv:1711.02038 (2017). arXiv:1711.02038
[40] A. W. Harrow, A. Hassidim, and S. Lloyd, Quantum algorithm for linear systems of equations, Phys. Rev. Lett. 103, 150502 (2009), arXiv:0811.3171, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.150502. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.103.150502 arXiv:0811.3171
[41] B. D. Clader, B. C. Jacobs, and C. R. Sprouse, Preconditioned quantum linear system algorithm, Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 250504 (2013), arXiv:1301.2340, 10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.250504. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.250504 arXiv:1301.2340
[42] A. Montanaro and S. Pallister, Quantum algorithms and the finite element method, Phys. Rev. A 93, 032324 (2016), arXiv:1512.05903, 10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032324. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.93.032324 arXiv:1512.05903
[43] P. C. S. Costa, S. Jordan, and A. Ostrander, Quantum algorithm for simulating the wave equation, arXiv:1711.05394 (2017). arXiv:1711.05394
[44] I. Kerenidis and A. Prakash, Quantum recommendation systems, arXiv:1603.08675 (2016). arXiv:1603.08675
[45] E. Tang, A quantum-inspired classical algorithm for recommendation systems, Electronic Colloquium on Computational Complexity, TR18-12 (2018).
[46] F. G. S. L. Brando and K. Svore, Quantum speed-ups for semidefinite programming, Proceedings of FOCS 2017, arXiv:1609.05537 (2017). arXiv:1609.05537
[47] F. G. S. L. Brando, A. Kalev, T. Li, C. Y.-Y. Lin, K. M. Svore, and X. Wu, Exponential quantum speed-ups for semidefinite programming with applications to quantum learning, arXiv:1710.02581 (2017). arXiv:1710.02581
[48] M. Reiher, N. Wiebe, K. M. Svore, D. Wecker, and M. Troyer, Elucidating reaction mechanisms on quantum computers, PNAS 117, 7555-7560 (2017), arXiv:1605.03590, 10.1073/pnas.1619152114. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619152114 arXiv:1605.03590
[49] D. Wecker, M. B. Hastings, N. Wiebe, B. K. Clark, C. Nayak, and M. Troyer, Solving strongly correlated electron models on a quantum computer, Phys. Rev. A 92, 062310 (2015), arXiv:1506.05135, 10.1103/PhysRevA.92.062318. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.062318 arXiv:1506.05135
[50] J. Olson, Y. Cao, J. Romero, P. Johnson, P.-L. Dallaire-Demers, N. Sawaya, P. Narang, I. Kivlichan, M. Wasielewski, A. Aspuru-Guzik, Quantum information and computation for chemistry, NSF Workshop Report, arXiv:1706.05413 (2017). arXiv:1706.05413
[51] H. Bernien, S. Schwartz, A. Keesling, H. Levine, A. Omran, H. Pichler, S. Choi, A. S. Zibrov, M. Endres, M. Greiner, V Vuleti, and M. D. Lukin, Probing many-body dynamics on a 51-atom quantum simulator, Nature 551, 579-584 (2017), arXiv:1707.04344, 10.1038/nature24622. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24622 arXiv:1707.04344
[52] J. Zhang, G. Pagano, P. W. Hess, A. Kyprianidis, P. Becker, H. Kaplan, A. V. Gorshkov, Z.-X. Gong, and C. Monroe, Observation of a many-body dynamical phase transition with a 53-qubit quantum simulator, arXiv:1708.01044 (2017), 10.1038/nature24654. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature24654 arXiv:1708.01044
[53] E. T. Campbell, B. M. Terhal, and C. Vuillot, The steep road towards robust and universal quantum computation, arXiv:1612.07330 (2016). arXiv:1612.07330
[54] J. J. Wallman and J. Emerson, Noise tailoring for scalable quantum computation via randomized compiling, Phys. Rev. A 94, 052325 (2016), arXiv:1512:01098, 10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052325. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.94.052325 arXiv:1512
[55] J. Combes, C. Granade, C. Ferrie, and S. T. Flammia, Logical randomized benchmarking, arXiv:1702.03688 (2017). arXiv:1702.03688
[56] A. G. Fowler, M. Mariantoni, J. M. Martinis, and A. N. Cleland, Surface codes: towards practical large-scale quantum computation, Phys. Rev. A 86, 032324 (2012), arXiv:1208.0928, 10.1103/PhysRevA.86.032324. https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.86.032324 arXiv:1208.0928
[57] S. Das Sarma, M. Freedman, and C. Nayak, Majorana zero modes and topological quantum computation, npj Quantum Information 1, 15001 (2015), arXiv:1501.02813, 10.1038/npjqi.2015.1. https://doi.org/10.1038/npjqi.2015.1 arXiv:1501.02813
[1] Vojtch Havlek, Antonio D. Crcoles, Kristan Temme, Aram W. Harrow, Abhinav Kandala, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta, "Supervised learning with quantum-enhanced feature spaces", Nature 567 7747, 209 (2019).
[2] Abhinav Kandala, Kristan Temme, Antonio D. Crcoles, Antonio Mezzacapo, Jerry M. Chow, and Jay M. Gambetta, "Error mitigation extends the computational reach of a noisy quantum processor", Nature 567 7749, 491 (2019).
[3] Andrew D. King, Juan Carrasquilla, Jack Raymond, Isil Ozfidan, Evgeny Andriyash, Andrew Berkley, Mauricio Reis, Trevor Lanting, Richard Harris, Fabio Altomare, Kelly Boothby, Paul I. Bunyk, Colin Enderud, Alexandre Frchette, Emile Hoskinson, Nicolas Ladizinsky, Travis Oh, Gabriel Poulin-Lamarre, Christopher Rich, Yuki Sato, Anatoly Yu. Smirnov, Loren J. Swenson, Mark H. Volkmann, Jed Whittaker, Jason Yao, Eric Ladizinsky, Mark W. Johnson, Jeremy Hilton, and Mohammad H. Amin, "Observation of topological phenomena in a programmable lattice of 1,800 qubits", Nature 560 7719, 456 (2018).
[4] Seth Lloyd and Christian Weedbrook, "Quantum Generative Adversarial Learning", Physical Review Letters 121 4, 040502 (2018).
[5] Victor V. Albert, Kyungjoo Noh, Kasper Duivenvoorden, Dylan J. Young, R. T. Brierley, Philip Reinhold, Christophe Vuillot, Linshu Li, Chao Shen, S. M. Girvin, Barbara M. Terhal, and Liang Jiang, "Performance and structure of single-mode bosonic codes", Physical Review A 97 3, 032346 (2018).
[6] Panagiotis Kl. Barkoutsos, Jerome F. Gonthier, Igor Sokolov, Nikolaj Moll, Gian Salis, Andreas Fuhrer, Marc Ganzhorn, Daniel J. Egger, Matthias Troyer, Antonio Mezzacapo, Stefan Filipp, and Ivano Tavernelli, "Quantum algorithms for electronic structure calculations: Particle-hole Hamiltonian and optimized wave-function expansions", Physical Review A 98 2, 022322 (2018).
[7] Guillaume Verdon, Michael Broughton, Jarrod R. McClean, Kevin J. Sung, Ryan Babbush, Zhang Jiang, Hartmut Neven, and Masoud Mohseni, "Learning to learn with quantum neural networks via classical neural networks", arXiv:1907.05415.
[8] Pierre-Luc Dallaire-Demers and Nathan Killoran, "Quantum generative adversarial networks", Physical Review A 98 1, 012324 (2018).
[9] Gavin E. Crooks, "Gradients of parameterized quantum gates using the parameter-shift rule and gate decomposition", arXiv:1905.13311.
[10] Edward Grant, Marcello Benedetti, Shuxiang Cao, Andrew Hallam, Joshua Lockhart, Vid Stojevic, Andrew G. Green, and Simone Severini, "Hierarchical quantum classifiers", npj Quantum Information 4, 65 (2018).
[11] J. Preskill, "Simulating quantum field theory with a quantum computer", The 36th Annual International Symposium on Lattice Field Theory. 22-28 July 24 (2018).
[12] Zhang Jiang, Kevin J. Sung, Kostyantyn Kechedzhi, Vadim N. Smelyanskiy, and Sergio Boixo, "Quantum Algorithms to Simulate Many-Body Physics of Correlated Fermions", Physical Review Applied 9 4, 044036 (2018).
[13] Sam McArdle, Suguru Endo, Alan Aspuru-Guzik, Simon Benjamin, and Xiao Yuan, "Quantum computational chemistry", arXiv:1808.10402.
[14] Jianxin Chen, Fang Zhang, Cupjin Huang, Michael Newman, and Yaoyun Shi, "Classical Simulation of Intermediate-Size Quantum Circuits", arXiv:1805.01450.
[15] Yuxuan Du, Min-Hsiu Hsieh, Tongliang Liu, and Dacheng Tao, "The Expressive Power of Parameterized Quantum Circuits", arXiv:1810.11922.
[16] Tameem Albash and Daniel A. Lidar, "Demonstration of a Scaling Advantage for a Quantum Annealer over Simulated Annealing", Physical Review X 8 3, 031016 (2018).
[17] Ling Hu, Shu-Hao Wu, Weizhou Cai, Yuwei Ma, Xianghao Mu, Yuan Xu, Haiyan Wang, Yipu Song, Dong-Ling Deng, Chang-Ling Zou, and Luyan Sun, "Quantum generative adversarial learning in a superconducting quantum circuit", Science Advances 5 1, eaav2761 (2019).
[18] Aram Harrow and John Napp, "Low-depth gradient measurements can improve convergence in variational hybrid quantum-classical algorithms", arXiv:1901.05374.
[19] Guillaume Verdon, Jason Pye, and Michael Broughton, "A Universal Training Algorithm for Quantum Deep Learning", arXiv:1806.09729.
[20] Kentaro Heya, Yasunari Suzuki, Yasunobu Nakamura, and Keisuke Fujii, "Variational Quantum Gate Optimization", arXiv:1810.12745.
[21] Ramis Movassagh, "Quantum supremacy and random circuits", arXiv:1909.06210.
[22] Bryan O'Gorman, William J. Huggins, Eleanor G. Rieffel, and K. Birgitta Whaley, "Generalized swap networks for near-term quantum computing", arXiv:1905.05118.
[23] Yudong Cao, Jonathan Romero, Jonathan P. Olson, Matthias Degroote, Peter D. Johnson, Mria Kieferov, Ian D. Kivlichan, Tim Menke, Borja Peropadre, Nicolas P. D. Sawaya, Sukin Sim, Libor Veis, and Aln Aspuru-Guzik, "Quantum Chemistry in the Age of Quantum Computing", arXiv:1812.09976.
[24] Sebastien Piat, Nairi Usher, Simone Severini, Mark Herbster, Tommaso Mansi, and Peter Mountney, "Image classification with quantum pre-training and auto-encoders", International Journal of Quantum Information 16 8, 1840009-332 (2018).
[25] Eric R. Anschuetz, Jonathan P. Olson, Aln Aspuru-Guzik, and Yudong Cao, "Variational Quantum Factoring", arXiv:1808.08927.
[26] Brian Swingle and Nicole Yunger Halpern, "Resilience of scrambling measurements", Physical Review A 97 6, 062113 (2018).
[27] Xun Gao and Luming Duan, "Efficient classical simulation of noisy quantum computation", arXiv:1810.03176.
[28] Jonathan Romero and Alan Aspuru-Guzik, "Variational quantum generators: Generative adversarial quantum machine learning for continuous distributions", arXiv:1901.00848.
[29] Maria Schuld and Nathan Killoran, "Quantum machine learning in feature Hilbert spaces", arXiv:1803.07128.
[30] Swamit S. Tannu and Moinuddin K. Qureshi, "A Case for Variability-Aware Policies for NISQ-Era Quantum Computers", arXiv:1805.10224.
[31] Mark Fingerhuth, Tom Babej, and Christopher Ing, "A quantum alternating operator ansatz with hard and soft constraints for lattice protein folding", arXiv:1810.13411.
[32] Sumsam Ullah Khan, Ahsan Javed Awan, and Gemma Vall-Llosera, "K-Means Clustering on Noisy Intermediate Scale Quantum Computers", arXiv:1909.12183.
[33] Gushu Li, Yufei Ding, and Yuan Xie, "Tackling the Qubit Mapping Problem for NISQ-Era Quantum Devices", arXiv:1809.02573.
[34] A. Garcia-Saez and J. I. Latorre, "Addressing hard classical problems with Adiabatically Assisted Variational Quantum Eigensolvers", arXiv:1806.02287.
[35] Javier Gil Vidal and Dirk Oliver Theis, "Calculus on parameterized quantum circuits", arXiv:1812.06323.
[36] Kazuki Ikeda, Yuma Nakamura, and Travis S. Humble, "Application of Quantum Annealing to Nurse Scheduling Problem", Scientific Reports 9, 12837 (2019).
[37] Alwin Zulehner and Robert Wille, "Compiling SU(4) Quantum Circuits to IBM QX Architectures", arXiv:1808.05661.
[38] Juan Miguel Arrazola, Thomas R. Bromley, and Patrick Rebentrost, "Quantum approximate optimization with Gaussian boson sampling", Physical Review A 98 1, 012322 (2018).
[39] Zhang Jiang, Jarrod McClean, Ryan Babbush, and Hartmut Neven, "Majorana Loop Stabilizer Codes for Error Mitigation in Fermionic Quantum Simulations", Physical Review Applied 12 6, 064041 (2019).
[40] Salonik Resch and Ulya R. Karpuzcu, "Quantum Computing: An Overview Across the System Stack", arXiv:1905.07240.
[41] Sergey Bravyi, Dan Browne, Padraic Calpin, Earl Campbell, David Gosset, and Mark Howard, "Simulation of quantum circuits by low-rank stabilizer decompositions", arXiv:1808.00128.
[42] Zhong-Xiao Man, Yun-Jie Xia, and Rosario Lo Franco, "Temperature effects on quantum non-Markovianity via collision models", Physical Review A 97 6, 062104 (2018).
View post:
Quantum Computing in the NISQ era and beyond Quantum
- Scientists use quantum machine learning to create semiconductors for the first time and it could transform how chips are made - Live Science - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- IonQ Just Nabbed a Former JPMorgan Research Leader. How Should You Play the Quantum Computing Stock Here? - Yahoo Finance - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- Quantum computing occurs naturally in the human brain, study finds - The Brighter Side of News - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- Xanadu Advances TFLN Photonic Chips with HyperLight for Quantum Hardware Scaling - HPCwire - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- D-Wave Quantum Announces Strategic Development Initiative for Advanced Cryogenic Packaging - TechPowerUp - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- Prepping for the quantum threat requires a phased approach to crypto agility - csoonline.com - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- Navigating The Quantum Revolution In A Year Of Transformation - Semiconductor Engineering - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- QUBT or RGTI: Which Quantum Stock Offers the Better Upside Now? - TradingView - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- Entanglement-induced provable and robust quantum learning advantages - Nature - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- Researchers zero in on a new material for quantum information storage - anl.gov - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- The best ways to play the emergence of quantum computing, according to Rosenblatt - CNBC - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- Quantum Could be Threat And Shield For Tomorrows Warfighters, Strategists Suggest - The Quantum Insider - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- QBTS or IONQ? Rosenblatt Picks the Better Quantum Computing Stock - TipRanks - July 30th, 2025 [July 30th, 2025]
- IonQ's Global Push: Will Asia Deals Spark the Next Growth Wave? - Yahoo Finance - July 28th, 2025 [July 28th, 2025]
- Variational Eigensolver Accurately Simulates Lattice Gauge Theory Ground States and String Breaking - Quantum Zeitgeist - July 28th, 2025 [July 28th, 2025]
- 'The era of quantum supremacy is just around the corner,' IonQ CEO says - CNBC - July 28th, 2025 [July 28th, 2025]
- Illinois is trying to get Canadian quantum firms to scale in Chicago - The Logic - July 28th, 2025 [July 28th, 2025]
- Prediction: Quantum Computing Stock Will Be Worth This Much in 2030 - Nasdaq - July 28th, 2025 [July 28th, 2025]
- SuperQ Quantum and Economic Development Lethbridge Hosting Masterclass on Business Optimization Using Quantum Computing with Approximately One Hundred... - July 28th, 2025 [July 28th, 2025]
- Why This Startup Is Building a $50 Million Computer - Inc.com - July 27th, 2025 [July 27th, 2025]
- Could a Quantum Computing Bubble Be About to Pop? History Offers a Clear Answer - The Globe and Mail - July 27th, 2025 [July 27th, 2025]
- Could Metasurfaces be The Next Quantum Information Processors? - The Quantum Insider - July 27th, 2025 [July 27th, 2025]
- Why Some Investors Are Betting Big on Quantum Computing as a Moonshot Artificial Intelligence (AI) Play - Yahoo Finance - July 27th, 2025 [July 27th, 2025]
- IonQ CEO drops bold call on quantum computings tipping point - TheStreet - July 27th, 2025 [July 27th, 2025]
- Worlds most powerful quantum computer to be invested in by Denmark - IceNews - Daily News - July 27th, 2025 [July 27th, 2025]
- Buy D-Wave Quantum Stock, Analyst Says. Its a Compelling Investment Opportunity. - Barron's - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Pacific Northwest tech pioneers team up in quantum realms and on the space frontier - GeekWire - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Quantum Computing Inc. (QUBT): A Bear Case Theory - MSN - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Can Unisys Capitalize Early With Looming Quantum Threats? - TradingView - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Quantum Beach 2025 to Spotlight Floridas Role in the Global Quantum Economy - The Quantum Insider - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- EXPLAINER - What is quantum computing, and why does it matter? - AnewZ - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- D-Wave or IonQ: Which Quantum Stock Has More Upside in 2025? - Yahoo Finance - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Infleqtion to Build Neutral Atom Quantum Computer in Illinois, Backed by $50 Million Partnership - The Quantum Insider - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- The worlds most powerful quantum computer is coming to Denmark - Evertiq - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Microsoft and Atom Computing to build "worlds most powerful quantum computer" in Denmark - Data Center Dynamics - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Billionaires Are Buying This Quantum Computing Stock Hand Over Fist (Hint: It's Not IonQ or D-Wave Quantum) - The Motley Fool - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Quantum Stocks Slide: Is the Hype-Fueled Rally Over? - 24/7 Wall St. - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Apply to host an event at Qiskit Fall Fest 2025! - IBM - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- 'NSF was there at the start' an experimental quantum chip may yield more robust qubits - National Science Foundation (.gov) - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Want to Invest in Quantum Computing? 4 Stocks That Are Great Buys Right Now - The Motley Fool - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Will IonQ's Hardware Push Drive the Next Wave of Quantum Monetization? - TradingView - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Billionaires Are Buying This Quantum Computing Stock Hand Over Fist (Hint: It's Not IonQ or D-Wave Quantum) - AOL.com - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- JPMorgan Overhauls Quantum Team, Rehires Former Exec - IoT World Today - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- 54-qubit superconducting quantum processor from IQM now avaialable on Amazon Braket - Scientific Computing World - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- 2 Top Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy in July - MSN - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- New trapped-atom qubit technology translates to industry-ready quantum computing product - College of Engineering | University of Wisconsin-Madison - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- D-Wave Quantum (QBTS) Capitalizes on Annealing Advantage to Extend Bullish Outlook - TipRanks - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Google Research Award Calls For Scientists to Probe Quantum Effects in The Brain - The Quantum Insider - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Quantum Computing Threatens Blockchains, Driving Development Of Resistant Systems - Quantum Zeitgeist - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Quantum Computing: What We Know Ahead Of Q2 (NASDAQ:QUBT) - Seeking Alpha - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- SpinQ's Quantum Computing Breakthrough: 100-Qubit Machine by Year-End - News and Statistics - IndexBox - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- QED-C holds second annual Quantum Technologies Showcase on Capitol Hill - Scientific Computing World - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- The Quantum Bitcoin Summit: A Grounded Look At The Issues - Bitcoin Magazine - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Why Shares of Rigetti Computing Have Blasted 41% Higher This Week - The Motley Fool - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Quantum computing will soon crack todays encryption methods.Here are 3 ways businesses can prepare - The World Economic Forum - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- 7M Bitcoin at Risk as Quantum Computing Set to Break Crypto in 3 Years | Interview - Cryptonews - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- QED-C Holds Second Annual Quantum Technologies Showcase on Capitol Hill - The Quantum Insider - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- PsiQuantums Chicago quantum computer to begin operations in 2028 - Bloomberg - Investing.com - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Chicagos $1 Billion Quantum Computer Set to Go Live in 2028 - Bloomberg.com - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Are We in a Quantum Computing Bubble? - MSN - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Quantum computing is so fire No, seriously. BofA says it could be humanity's biggest breakthrough since the discovery of fire - Fortune - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- 2 Top Quantum Computing Stocks to Buy in July - The Motley Fool - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Bitcoin News: How Quantum Computing Threatens the Math Behind Satoshi Nakamoto's Creation - CoinDesk - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Should You Invest $1,000 in Quantum Computing Competitor Rigetti Computing? - The Motley Fool - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Google solves septillionyear problem This quantum chip is the end of computers - El Diario 24 - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Researchers Push for Open-Source Quantum Tools to Break Critical Industry Bottlenecks - The Quantum Insider - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Quantum Leap or Overpriced Hype? D-Wave's $400M Raise and the Future of Quantum Computing - AInvest - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Want to Invest in Quantum Computing Without the Crazy Risk? Buy These 3 Stocks. - The Globe and Mail - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Quantum computing edges closer to biotech reality in Moderna-IBM pact - R&D World - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Scientists achieve 'magic state' quantum computing breakthrough 20 years in the making quantum computers can never be truly useful without it -... - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Guest Post -- Practical Quantum Advantage in the Context of Quantum AI: Rise of the Hybrid Systems - The Quantum Insider - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Warren Buffett Is Invested in These Three Magnificent Quantum Computing Stocks. Here's the Best of the Bunch. - Yahoo Finance - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- After Plummeting by 18%, Could This Quantum Computing Stock Stage a Second-Half Comeback? - The Motley Fool - July 20th, 2025 [July 20th, 2025]
- Scientists make 'magic state' breakthrough after 20 years without it, quantum computers can never be truly useful - Live Science - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- D-Wave Quantum Skyrocketed Today. Is the Stock a Buy? - Yahoo Finance - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- EIFO and the Novo Nordisk Foundation Acquire the Worlds Most Powerful Quantum Computer - Novo Nordisk Fonden - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Israel and US to forge $200m tech hub for AI and quantum science development - The Times of Israel - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Quantum code breaking? You'd get further with an 8-bit computer, an abacus, and a dog - theregister.com - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- Is quantum computing the next big thing in stocks? - TheStreet - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]
- What to do while pursuing the promise of quantum computing - Brookings - July 18th, 2025 [July 18th, 2025]