A CPAC history lesson: How Rand Paul could be like Ronald Reagan

Story highlights Could President Obama's legacy include fixing Ferguson? Rand Paul, Jeb Bush and Hillary Clinton compete for Silicon Valley cash Will 2016 be the year of the super PAC election?

1. Winning CPAC once meant little, but are Rand Paul's multiple wins just the ticket?

Rand Paul won his third consecutive CPAC presidential straw poll this weekend, and most political journalists yawned -- and understandably so.

There have been 20 previous CPAC straw polls, and only in four of those cases has the winner ended up as the Republican presidential nominee. And in all four of those cases, it was in the actual election year.

Never has a winner in the year before the presidential vote -- like this year -- gone on to win the nomination. So Sen. Paul shouldn't rush to measure the White House drapes.

But he is now in special company: He's in a tie for CPAC wins (three) with Ronald Reagan and Jack Kemp. Mitt Romney is the all-time leader with four CPAC wins. Ron Paul has two.

So winning once is more or less meaningless, but winning twice or more? The Pauls -- Rand and Ron -- are the only two men with at least two CPAC wins who have not appeared on the GOP ticket. (Kemp was Bob Dole's VP nominee.)

It's one more way, we can assume, that Rand Paul hopes to get some separation from his dad heading into 2016.

2. POTUS hopes for action -- and legacy item -- in law enforcement arena

Washington will be consumed this week with Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's speech to Congress and the continuing fight over funding the Department of Homeland Security.

More:
A CPAC history lesson: How Rand Paul could be like Ronald Reagan

Related Posts

Comments are closed.