Virginia’s aggressive gerrymandering means voters can have Republican rule or nothing – ThinkProgress

Virginia Democratic gubernatorial candidates Tom Perriello (front) and Ralph Northam. CREDIT: AP Photo/Steve Helber

This morning, I woke up, showered, walked my dog, then drove to the local high school to vote in Virginias primary election. Hopefully, I will get to vote for the same candidate I voted for today in Novembers general election.

But theres one thing I wont be able to vote for this election cyclea government that is actually capable of implementing policies favored by the Democratic Party. Thanks in large part to aggressive gerrymandering in the Virginia House of Delegates, I will get to choose between total Republican dominance of my home state or gridlock.

Virginia is an increasingly blue state. Hillary Clinton won the state by over five points. President Obama won it twice. The current governor, Terry McAuliffe, is a former chair of the Democratic National Committee. Both Democratic candidates in todays primaryformer Rep. Tom Perriello and Lt. Gov. Ralph Northamare strongly favored over their likely Republican opponent in the general election.

Yet the GOP holds 66 seats in the states 100 seat House of Delegates. In 2013, the same year that Democrats swept all three of Virginias statewide offices, the GOP won 67 seats in the state house.

What this means is that, if a Republican wins this Novembers gubernatorial race, that Republican is highly likely to have a GOP state house and senate that will enact the full Republican agenda. Voter suppression, draconian budgets, pro-discrimination laws dressed up as religious liberty and similar legislation are all likely to follow.

If you want to know what this looks like, take a look at North Carolina. Or Louisiana. Or Kansas. Or Texas.

Meanwhile, if Perriello or Northam win, it will be nearly impossible for Virginias voters to elect a Democratic House of Delegateseven if a majority of those voters cast a ballot for a Democratic candidate. That means that major Democratic priorities like expanding Medicaid, protecting voting rights, reducing gun violence, and environmental protection will almost certainly receive no support from the state legislature.

Republicans can go to the polls dreaming of the kind of state governance that they most desire. Democrats can only hope to ward off an outcome that they hate. That not only gives Republicans a serious advantage in the policy sphere, it also is likely to demoralize Democrats on Election Daypotentially swinging the result.

Of course, that doesnt mean that voting in the Virginia gubernatorial election is futile. At the federal level, the difference between the Obama administration and the Trump administration is immense, even if Obama spent most of his time in office with a Republican House of Representatives. The difference between a fully-empowered Republican governor and a weakened Democrat would be equally significant.

The next governor of Virginia, moreover, will sit during the next redistricting cycleso they will have the power to veto a bill that tries to entrench gerrymandering in the House of Delegates even further.

But, barring an utter landslide, theres one thing that isnt on the ballot this Novembera fair choice between Democrats and Republicans.

View post:
Virginia's aggressive gerrymandering means voters can have Republican rule or nothing - ThinkProgress

Related Posts

Comments are closed.