Coffman joins Republicans against President Trump’s travel ban; Here’s where the rest stand – The Denver Post
Aaron Blake, The Washington Post
President Donald Trumps executive order to ban entry to the United States to citizens of seven predominantly Muslim countries has been roundly criticized by the international community and Democrats, who allege is amounts to a religious test even a thinly veiled Muslim ban. There have also been numerous implementation headaches, with two judges halting deportations of those denied entry.
And some Republicans are speaking out against Trump too albeit to varying degrees. Below, we break down who has gone on the record for, against, or somewhat in the middle on Trumps executive order.
This list is necessarily incomplete, but it will be updated as more lawmakers weigh in. If you see one weve missed, email aaron.blake@washpost.com.
Rep. Charlie Dent, R-Pa.: This is ridiculous. I guess I understand what his intention is, but unfortunately the order appears to have been rushed through without full consideration. You know, there are many, many nuances of immigration policy that can be life or death for many innocent, vulnerable people around the world.
Sen. Jeff Flake, R-Ariz.: Its unacceptable when even legal permanent residents are being detained or turned away at airports and ports of entry.
Rep. Justin Amash, R-Mich.: Like Pres. Obamas executive actions on immigration, Pres. Trumps executive order overreaches and undermines our constitutional system.
Sen. Ben Sasse, R-Neb.: The order is too broad. If we send a signal to the Middle East that the U.S. sees all Muslims as jihadis, the terrorist recruiters win by telling kids that America is banning Muslims and that this is America versus one religion. Our generational fight against jihadism requires wisdom.
Rep. Barbara Comstock, R-Va.: The presidents Executive Order [goes] beyond the increased vetting actions that Congress has supported on a bipartisan basis and inexplicably applied to Green Card holders. This should be addressed and corrected expeditiously.
Rep. Brian Fitzpatrick, R-Pa.: The presidents policy entirely misses the mark.
Rep. Mike Coffman, R-Colo.: While Ive supported heightened vetting procedures for those wanting to travel to our country, I have never, nor will I ever support a blanket travel ban for people solely based on ethnic or religious grounds.
Sen. Susan Collins, R-Maine: The worldwide refugee ban set forth in the executive order is overly broad and implementing it will be immediately problematic.
Rep. Ileana Ros-Lehtinen, R-Fla.: I object to the suspension of visas from the seven named countries because we could have accomplished our objective of keeping our homeland safe by immediate implementation of more thorough screening procedures.
Rep. Elise Stefanik, R-N.Y.: Our first role as the federal government is to protect our national security and I believe we need to work in Congress to reform and strengthen our visa vetting process. However, I oppose President Trumps rushed and overly broad Executive Order.
Sen. Marco Rubio, R-Fla.: While I am supportive of strengthening our screening processes and securing our borders, a blanket travel ban goes too far. I also believe that lawful residents of the United States should be permitted to enter the country. I urge the Administration to take the appropriate steps to fix this overly broad executive order.
Rep. Will Hurd, R-Tex.: The ban is the ultimate display of mistrust and will erode allies willingness to fight with us.
Senate Majority Leader Mitch McConnell, R-Ky.: Its going to be decided in the courts as to whether or not this has gone too far.
Sen. Mike Lee, R-Utah: I do have some technical questions about President Trumps Executive Order titled Protecting the Nation From Foreign Terrorist Entry Into the United States. My staff and I will continue to reach out to the White House for clarification on these issues.
House Foreign Affairs Committee Chairman Rep. Edward R. Royce, R-Calif.: Pausing the intake of refugees from terror hot spots is the right call to keep America safe. I hope cases of individuals with visas traveling as this executive action went into effect including some who served alongside U.S. troops will be resolved quickly.
Sen. Orrin G. Hatch, R-Utah: President Trump has described his recent order as a means [to] temporarily reduce investigative burdens on relevant agencies. In this spirit, I urge the new administration to move quickly to tailor its policy on visa issuance as narrowly as possible so that officials can protect our security needs while reducing unnecessary burdens on the vast majority of visa-seekers that present a promise-not a threat-to our nation.
Rep. Carlos Curbelo, R-Fla.: The United States is and has always been a generous nation when it comes to welcoming those who seek refuge and want to contribute. I expect that these executive orders are in fact temporary and that after the Administration strengthens the vetting process, we can continue our tradition of welcoming those who are persecuted in an orderly manner and without any kind of religious test.
Sen. John McCain, R-Ariz.: The good news is its only got to do with a pause. The bad news is that obviously that this process and these conclusions were not vetted. Theres so much confusion out there.
Sen. Rob Portman, R-Ohio: It is not a ban. However, I think it was not properly vetted. So, you have an extreme vetting proposal that didnt get the vetting it should have had. And as the result, in the implementation, weve seen some problems.
Rep. Lee Zeldin, R-N.Y.: I support the temporary entry restriction from certain nations until the administration, Congress and the American people know with confidence that any individual being granted admission does not pose a threat to our security. With all that being said, I will be closely monitoring the execution of this EO to make sure that any misapplication is corrected immediately.
Sen. James Lankford, R-Okla.: We should value freedom & not surrender security. We can protect the homeland while upholding #religiousfreedom & refuge for the persecuted.
Rep. Adam Kinzinger, R-Ill.: I support a comprehensive look at our vetting process, and I believe its something every new administration would be expected to do. However, reports of green card holders and those who assisted us in the war on terror being denied or delayed entry is deeply concerning. Such detention is unacceptable and must be remedied immediately.
Rep. Bruce Poliquin, R-Maine: The congressman will not be voting on these Executive Orders. His policy in Congress has been to increase border security, end sanctuary cities and stop Syrian refugee admissions until national security agencies put in place effective processes to ensure that no suspected or potential terrorists are allowed to cross our borders.
Sen. Lindsey Graham, R-S.C.: It is clear from the confusion at our airports across the nation that President Trumps executive order was not properly vetted. We are particularly concerned by reports that this order went into effect with little to no consultation with the Departments of State, Defense, Justice, and Homeland Security.
Sen. Thom Tillis, R-N.C.
Rep. Mark Walker, R-N.C.: The language of the order should not apply to legal permanent residents of the United States, and if it is being enforced in any other way, the administration should step in swiftly to clarify.
Sen. John Barrasso, R-Wyo.: America has long needed to tighten the vetting process for those seeking to come here. However, a religious test or ban is against everything our country stands for. We need to remember that some of our best sources of information that keeps our nation and our troops safe comes from our Muslim friends and allies.
Rep. Jason Chaffetz, R-Utah: I think its surprising a lot of people that he is actually doing what he said he was going to do, but there are those of us that actually support that. People that have a green card supposedly already have been vetted, so there needs to be some further clarification.
Rep. Jim Renacci, R-Ohio: While I strongly encourage the Administration to examine more closely whether it is effectual and necessary to subject green card holders from these nations to this temporary order, I fully support our governments renewed commitment to keeping Americans of all faiths safe and free across our homeland.
Sen. Lamar Alexander, R-Tenn.: This vetting proposal itself needed more vetting. More scrutiny of those traveling from war-torn countries to the United States is wise. But this broad and confusing order seems to ban legal, permanent residents with green cards, and might turn away Iraqis, for example, who were translators and helped save lives of Americans troops and who could be killed if they stay in Iraq. And while not explicitly a religious test, it comes close to one which is inconsistent with our American character.
Sen. Bob Corker, R-Tenn.: We all share a desire to protect the American people, but this executive order has been poorly implemented, especially with respect to green card holders. The administration should immediately make appropriate revisions, and it is my hope that following a thorough review and implementation of security enhancements that many of these programs will be improved and reinstated.
House Speaker Paul D. Ryan, R-Wis.: President Trump is right to make sure we are doing everything possible to know exactly who is entering our country.
House Homeland Security Committee Chairman Rep. Michael McCaul, R-Tex.: With the stroke of a pen, he is doing more to shut down terrorist pathways into this country than the last Administration did in eight years.
Rep. Lou Barletta, R-Pa.: I commend President Trump for suspending the refugee program, and in particular for Syria and the six other countries, because they are unquestionably terrorist havens and hotspots.
Rep. Jeff Duncan, R-S.C.: Im grateful that @realDonaldTrump is making the safety & security of the American people his top priority. His actions are very appropriate.
Rep. Steve Scalise, R-La.: Its very prudent to say, Lets be careful about who comes into our country to make sure that theyre not terrorists.
Rep. Dan Donovan, R-N.Y.: President Trumps decision is in Americas best interest, and I support exploring safe zones in the region to protect innocent life.
Rep. Bob Goodlatte, R-Va.: The primary duty of the federal government is to keep Americans safe. Today, President Trump has begun to fulfill this responsibility by taking a number of critical steps within his authority to strengthen national security and the integrity of our nations immigration system.
Rep. Dave Trott, R-Mich.: Until we can adequately vet these refugees and ensure the safety of all Americans, I support President Trumps executive order to stay refugees from these terror-prone countries.
Rep. Dave Reichert, R-Wash.: My first and most important job is protecting families in our region and the American people . . . We must be absolutely certain we have systems in place capable of thoroughly vetting anyone applying for refugee status on American soil.
Sen. Tom Cotton, R-Ark.: Its simply wrong to call the presidents executive order concerning immigration and refugees a religious test of any kind. I doubt many Arkansans or Americans more broadly object to taking a harder look at foreigners coming into our country from war-torn nations with known terror networks; I think theyre wondering why we dont do that already.
Sen. Roy Blunt, R-Mo.: He is doing what he told the American people he would do. I would not support a travel ban on Muslims; I do support increased vetting on people applying to travel from countries with extensive terrorist ties or activity. These seven countries meet that standard. Our top priority should be to keep Americans safe.
Rep. Bradley Byrne, R-Ala.: I appreciate President Trumps efforts to address these issues as he works to keep the American people safe. While there have been some issues with the orders implementation, I look forward to working with the Trump Administration to make sure their efforts to protect the American people succeed in a timely and effective manner.
Rep. Scott Taylor, R-Va.: While I do not agree with some of the rhetoric, taking a pause, figuring out if we are properly vetting people, and making changes if necessary to continue our American principles is prudent and needed. The safety and protection of our citizens must remain our number one priority.
Rep. Vern Buchanan, R-Fla.: LONG OVERDUE: A freeze on Syrian refugees and a crackdown on sanctuary cities! Time to protect Americans.
Rep. Dennis Ross, R-Fla.: This is long overdue. We must ensure our country is safe from radical Islamic jihadists who want to kill Americans.
Rep. John Ratcliffe, R-Tex.: I applaud President Trumps actions to vamp up the vetting of refugees attempting to enter our country.
Rep. Brian Babin, R-Tex.: Great news now lets get it into law!
Rep. Bill Johnson, R-Ohio: I support President Trumps temporary, three month, precautionary action directed towards a handful of countries with a history of producing and exporting terrorists. These countries are either torn apart by violence, or under the control of hostile, jihadist governments.
Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers, R-Wash.: It is the federal governments responsibility to protect the American people, and the Trump administration is following through on that responsibility.
Rep. Jim Sensenbrenner, R-Wis.
Rep. Jackie Walorski, R-Ind.: The temporary suspension of the refugee program and admission of individuals from countries where terrorism poses an elevated threat will allow our national security officials to examine the vetting process and strengthen safeguards to prevent terrorists from entering our homeland. I hope the administration provides greater clarity in the coming days on its implementation of the order and its review of vetting procedures.
Rep. Roger Marshall, R-Kan.: President Trump is ensuring that he is doing all he can to protect us from radical Islamic terror, and to secure channels of migration in the future. Though we would like to see a more specific definition worked through Congress, we understand the need for quick action, and we stand by him in this effort.
Rep. Luke Messer, R-Ind.: This is a pause, not a ban, while we work to ensure the U.S. has effective vetting processes in place to protect Americans from terrorist threats. The details will of course matter, but its way past time for us to develop this capability, and President Trump is right to prioritize American safety until we get this done.
Rep. Richard Hudson, R-N.C.: At a time of grave security threats, President Trump is right to pause the flow of refugees from countries where terrorism is rampant until we can properly vet them and implement additional screening for individuals traveling to and from these countries.
Rep. Pete Sessions, R-Tex.: Just as President Obama suspended the refugee program in 2011 for six months, the Trump Administration is working to protect national security by making adjustments in the refugee vetting process. It is critical that we address the threat of individuals who come to our country to create chaos and threaten our freedom.
Rep. Todd Rokita, R-Ind.: This is not a ban on Muslim refugees, as the order specifically targets a select few nations with known terrorist networks and is similar to an executive order signed by President Obama without controversy in 2011. The President and his administration must now focus on the execution of this order, ensuring that it is implemented effectively and fairly.
Rep. Jodey Arrington, R-Tex.: It is important that our commander in chief puts the safety of Americans first. Given concerns about the inadequate vetting of refugees and problems with our immigration system, this temporary pause is intended to ensure the safety of our citizens.
Rep. Devin Nunes, R-Calif.: In light of attempts by jihadist groups to infiltrate fighters into refugee flows to the West, along with Europes tragic experience coping with this problem, the Trump Administrations executive order on refugees is a common-sense security measure to prevent terror attacks on the homeland. While accommodations should be made for green card holders and those whove assisted the U.S. armed forces, this is a useful temporary measure on seven nations of concern until we can verify who is entering the United States.
Rep. Rod Blum, R-Iowa: The bottom line is they cant properly vet people coming from war-torn areas like Syria and Iraq. If we cant vet people properly, then we shouldnt be allowing them into our country. Im supportive of that.
Rep. Joe Barton, R-Tex.: We have heard of brief delays among constituents and are empathetic to any inconveniences while traveling.
Rep. Roger Williams, R-Tex.: President Trump is responsible for defending this country, and I think what weve seen in the last couple days with executive orders that hes passed, thats what hes doing.
Rep. Kay Granger, R-Tex.: I am convinced that resident Trump made this decision because he believes it will make us safer.
Rep. Robert Pittenger, R-N.C.: While we should be responsive to those who are persecuted for their faith or impacted by war, we need a thorough vetting of all refugees, consistent with the American Security Against Foreign Enemies Act (H.R. 4038), which I co-sponsored and helped pass with strong bipartisan support in 2015. This bipartisan legislation required the FBI, CIA, and Homeland Security to be engaged in the refugee vetting process to prevent access by infiltrated terrorists.
SENATE
Alabama:Jeff Sessions, Richard Shelby
Alaska:Dan Sullivan,Lisa Murkowski
Arkansas:John Boozman
Georgia:David Perdue,Johnny Isakson
Idaho:Jim Risch,Mike Crapo
Indiana:Todd Young
Iowa: Joni Ernst,Chuck Grassley
Kansas:Pat Roberts,Jerry Moran
Kentucky:Rand Paul
Louisiana:Bill Cassidy,John Neely Kennedy
Mississippi:Roger Wicker,Thad Cochran
Montana:Steve Daines
Nebraska:Deb Fischer
Nevada:Dean Heller
North Carolina:Richard Burr
North Dakota:John Hoeven
Oklahoma:Jim Inhofe
Pennsylvania:Pat Toomey
South Carolina:Tim Scott
South Dakota:Mike Rounds, John Thune
Texas:Ted Cruz,John Cornyn
West Virginia:Shelley Moore Capito
Wisconsin:Ron Johnson
Wyoming:Mike Enzi
HOUSE
Alabama:Martha Roby,Mike Rogers,Robert Aderholt,Mo Brooks,Gary Palmer
Alaska:Don Young
Arizona:Martha McSally,Paul Gosar,Andy Biggs,David Schweikert,Trent Franks
Arkansas:Rick Crawford,French Hill,Steve Womack,Bruce Westerman
California:Doug LaMalfa,Tom McClintock,Paul Cook,Jeff Denham,David Valadao,Kevin McCarthy,Steve Knight,Ken Calvert,Mimi Walters,Dana Rohrabacher,Darrell Issa,Duncan Hunter
Colorado:Scott Tipton,Ken Buck,Doug Lamborn
- Republicans, not Democrats, hold fate of Trump nominees in their hands - The Washington Post - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Joy Reid sends message to Republicans ahead of Thanksgiving: 'Make your own dinner, MAGA' - Fox News - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Clean Energy Advocates and Businesses Wrestle With an Uncertain Future as Republicans Target IRA Funds - InsideClimate News - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- In WA state Legislature, Democrats and Republicans are sticking with their leaders - Washington State Standard - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Trump promised to boost oil and gas. But what do other Republicans think? - WWNO - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Iowa Republicans form House higher education committee for long overdue review - Higher Ed Dive - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Republicans to file contest lawsuit over 21 missing ballots in Scott County - ABC 6 News KAAL TV - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Republicans push back against Democrats' claims that Trump intelligence pick Gabbard is compromised - The Associated Press - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Republicans Ponder: What if the Trump Tax Cuts Cost Nothing? - The New York Times - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Why Republicans think their Senate majority could last the decade: From the Politics Desk - NBC News - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Republicans Big Tax Challenge Is Fitting All Their Priorities in One Bill - The Wall Street Journal - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Vying to be next governor, Republicans wrangle over Trump - NJ Spotlight News - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Sarah McBride on bathroom issues: It is an attempt to distract by Republicans - POLITICO - November 28th, 2024 [November 28th, 2024]
- Republicans suddenly think the economys great and the election wasnt rigged - POLITICO - November 17th, 2024 [November 17th, 2024]
- Big voter turnout this year benefited Republicans, contradicting conventional political wisdom - The Associated Press - November 17th, 2024 [November 17th, 2024]
- A study found that Xs algorithm now loves two things: Republicans and Elon Musk - The Verge - November 17th, 2024 [November 17th, 2024]
- Cole says Republicans should be working with Trump to try and achieve his objectives - The Hill - November 17th, 2024 [November 17th, 2024]
- What They Are Saying: Republicans Disgusted by Trumps Ultra-MAGA Gut Punch With Gaetz Pick - Democrats.org - November 17th, 2024 [November 17th, 2024]
- The Disturbing Reason Senate Republicans Might Greenlight All of Trumps Nominees - Slate - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- House elections produced a stalemate. Can Republicans figure out how to work with a thin majority? - The Associated Press - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- House Republicans applaud Trump's picking Kennedy to lead HHS -- with a few concerns - ABC News - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Trump is already testing Congress and daring Republicans to oppose him - The Associated Press - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans Are Leaving Office for Trump Posts. How Will the Vacancies Be Filled? - The New York Times - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans retain their hold of the House, clinching full control of Congress - NPR - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- NY Republicans may kill congestion pricing in Congress if Trump can't nix the tolls - Gothamist - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Trump is already testing Republicans, and some seem unwilling to defy him - The Washington Post - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Election 2024 highlights: Republicans win House majority of 218 seats - The Associated Press - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- What Republicans could do with their power as they secure control of House and Senate - PBS NewsHour - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans win the House and cement party trifecta for Trump - BBC.com - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- New York Republicans now have an Elise Stefanik-sized void to fill - POLITICO - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Schumer to Republicans: Please dont do to us what we were going to do to you - Washington Examiner - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans finally win the coveted trifecta - The Economist - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans will retain House majority, CNN projects, completing GOPs dominance of Washington - CNN - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- What Republicans are saying about Matt Gaetzs nomination for attorney general - The Associated Press - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans Maintain House Majority, Clinching Trifecta of Government Control - TIME - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- WATCH: House Republicans ready to deliver, Johnson says as GOP readies for new Trump era - PBS NewsHour - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- House Republicans strike deal on motion to vacate, making it harder to oust speaker - ABC News - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans Ran a Dysfunctional House. Voters Shrugged and Re-elected Them. - The New York Times - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans begin picking their next leaders in Congress - NPR - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans Try to Block Counting of Undated Ballots in Pennsylvania - Democracy Docket - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans Win Control Of The HouseGiving Trump Unified Government - Forbes - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Column: Victorious Republicans are once again falling for the mandate trap - Los Angeles Times - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans won the House. Now comes the hard part. - ABC News - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- As Trump Staffs Up, House Republicans Watch Their Expected Majority Shrink - The New York Times - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Could Matt Gaetz Face GOP Revolt? What Senate Republicans Have Said - Newsweek - November 16th, 2024 [November 16th, 2024]
- Republicans on the verge of clinching control of the US House - The Guardian US - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Florida Republicans are thrilled about Susie Wiles with one big exception - POLITICO - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Women fear Republicans will move to overturn no-fault divorce laws - The Washington Post - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Democrats and Republicans agree on one thing: any lessons learned from Trump 2.0 will be immediately forgotten - The Guardian - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Republicans win control of the Senate; House remains up for grabs - NBC News - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Hill Republicans ready ambitious agenda as they hope for full sweep of Washington - CNN - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Republicans will flip the Senate, CNN projects, shifting balance of power in Washington - CNN - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Republicans flip the US Senate, ending three years of Democrat control - Al Jazeera English - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Republicans reassert their dominance in Texas - The Texas Tribune - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- For Trump and Republicans in Congress, everything is in play on tax cuts - The Washington Post - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- With Republicans Claiming the Senate and Possibly the House, Congress Expected to Reverse Course on Climate - InsideClimate News - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Missouri voted for abortion-rights amendment and Republicans who vow to overturn it - Missouri Independent - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Republicans Make Early Inroads in Their Fight to Keep the House Majority - The New York Times - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Harris Tried to Win Over Republicans. Democratic Support Collapsed Instead - Rolling Stone - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- 'Republicans for Harris' Campaign Reported to FEC - Newsweek - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- The Death of Never Trump Republicans? - U.S. News & World Report - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Georgia: how this pivotal swing state flipped back to the Republicans - The Conversation - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- What Republicans can do with their new power and where theyll struggle - Semafor - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Republicans see possible path to total control of Washington - The Washington Post - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- How close are Republicans to retaining the House? Results show it's tight - Scripps News - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Control of the Senate went to the Republicans but what about the House? - NBC New York - November 10th, 2024 [November 10th, 2024]
- Georgia Republicans, Trump campaign file lawsuit to halt counties 'illegally accepting' early voting ballots - Fox News - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- Republicans' Chances of Winning the Senate, the House and the White House - Newsweek - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- If Donald Trump wins, these are the Republicans he'll lean on to pass his priorities - USA TODAY - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- I visited a deeply divided Pennsylvania and found Republicans repeating an enormous lie - The Guardian US - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- Republicans supporting Harris say "Whisper Caucus" could swing the election - NC Newsline - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- Opinion | Do Republicans like Trump in spite of what he says, or because of it? - The Washington Post - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- Here Are the Republicans Voting For Harris Over Trump - TIME - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- Republicans probably will try to repeal CHIPS Act that drew Micron to Central NY, House speaker says - syracuse.com - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- Opinion | My Fellow Republicans, Its Time to Say Enough With Trump - The New York Times - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- Kansas Republicans welcome surge in advance voting after adopting Democratic Party tactic - Kansas Reflector - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- Republicans are betting big on trans issues. Following through could prove harder. - POLITICO - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- Republicans Closing Argument: We Will Wreck the Economy - Bloomberg - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- 'Obamacare' enrollment opens, as Republicans threaten the health insurance program used by millions - The Associated Press - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]
- Johnson vows health care overhaul if Republicans win in November elections - CNN - November 4th, 2024 [November 4th, 2024]