Supreme Court Declares First Amendment Interest in Access to Social Networks – JD Supra (press release)
[co-author: Adi Kamdar - Summer Associate]
The internet has become so essential to American public discourse that saying so is almost trite now. Members of Congress regularly use social media to engage with constituents. The President has turned Twitter into one of his primary modes of communication. It was only a matter of time before the U.S. Supreme Court got its turn to sing the praises of social media.
In Packingham v. North Carolina, the Supreme Court unanimously struck down a North Carolina criminal law that made it a felony for registered sex offenders to access social networking and other websites. In doing so, however, the Court took a stepperhaps a bigger step than some intendedtoward guaranteeing a constitutional right under the First Amendment to access the internet.
Packingham involved a 2008 North Carolina statute that made it a felony for a registered sex offender to access a commercial social networking website that is known to allow minors. The law defined a commercial social networking website with four requirements: (1) the operator of the website had to earn revenue through fees or advertisements; (2) the website had to allow for social introductions between people; (3) the website must allow users to create widely available personal profiles or pages; and (4) the site must give users a mechanism of communicating with each other, such as through a chat room or message board. Though the law carved out a few exceptions, it created a broad enough stick that the state of North Carolina had already prosecuted over a thousand people for violating it.
Nearly a decade after Packingham was convicted for a sex crime and registered as a sex offender, he posted on Facebook about how excited he was to have gotten a traffic ticket dismissed. A member of the local law enforcement noticed the post, and the state charged Packingham with violating the North Carolina law without alleging he had contacted a minor or committed any other illicit acts on the internet. The trial court denied Packinghams First Amendment challenge to the statute, and he was ultimately convicted for violating the statute. North Carolinas intermediate Court of Appeals agreed with Packingham and struck down the statute. But the North Carolina Supreme Court reversed, finding the law to be carefully tailored to avoid violating the freedom of speech.
In an 8-0 decision, the Supreme Court on June 19 reversed the North Carolina Supreme Court and struck down the North Carolina law as unconstitutional.
Writing for five justices, Justice Anthony Kennedy kicked off his opinion with an analogy. Within First Amendment law, there is a basic rule that a street or a park is a quintessential forum for the exercise of speech. And what is the equivalent forum of today? The answer is clear, Justice Kennedy put forward: It is cyberspace. . . . and social media in particular.
The majority spent a good portion of its opinion highlighting the centrality of the internet to First Amendment activities and modern life. It noted that websites like Facebook, LinkedIn and Twitter collectively have billions of users, each of whom engages in multiple First Amendment-protected activities: debating religion and politics, sharing photographs, advertising and finding jobs, and reaching out to elected officials. Justice Kennedy went on to describe the Cyber Age as a revolution of historic proportions, acknowledging what lawyers working in this field have taken to heart: courts must be conscious that what they say today might be obsolete tomorrow.
The majority held that the North Carolina statute impermissibly burdened more speech than necessary in order to further its purposethe protection of children against recidivist sexual predators. Even though the Packingham majority acknowledged that North Carolinas goal was extremely important, it also found that the laws prohibitions were unprecedented in scope and thus could not stand. Social media sites allow for the communication of ideas and knowledge; they are the modern public square. Cutting individuals off from these important spaces prevents them from exercising their First Amendment rights. Furthermore, convicted criminals might receive legitimate benefits from these means for access to the world of ideas, in particular if they seek to reform and to pursue lawful and rewarding lives.
Writing for three members of the Court, Justice Samuel Alito concurred in the conclusion that the North Carolina law was overbroad and thus unconstitutional, but was hesitant to support the majoritys undisciplined . . . musings that seem to equate the entirety of the internet with public streets and parks. After all, Justice Alitos concurrence notes, there are clear distinctions between parks and cyberspace: from differences in the ability for parents to monitor their children, to differences in the amount of anonymity each space offers. And Justice Alito expressed concern that some may read the majoritys broad language as a prohibition on any and all attempts to pass laws addressing child sexual exploitation online or other efforts to regulate access to the internet.
At root, Justice Alitos concurrence took issue with the improper tailoring of the North Carolina law. Its vague language would prevent registered sex offenders from accessing, for example, Amazon, The Washington Post or WebMD. By categorically blocking access to these sites, the North Carolina law goes well beyond its intended means and runs afoul of the First Amendment.
The Courts Packingham decision is one of the first cases to seriously hint at the idea that access to online forums of expression is a protected right. Heavily relying on an amicus brief by the Electronic Frontier Foundation, Justice Kennedys opinion highlights the importance of the internet as a marketplace of ideas, and its central role in promoting associational rights of persons in a free society. The Packingham decision casts serious doubt on the constitutionality of state and federal statutes, regulations and interpretations, which may impose broad limitations on access to the internet, particularly where the restriction is based on a persons continuing status or in the absence of an adjudication. Packingham may ultimately prove to be a powerful doctrinal weapon that internet-based companies can wield against laws and regulations that limit access to their services.
An important question that Packingham leaves unanswered, however, is what level of constitutional scrutiny applies to content-neutral regulations affecting access to the modern internet. All eight justices agreed that the North Carolina statute, given its overbreadth, would fail under any level of scrutiny under First Amendment jurisprudence. But the majoritys opinion gives little guidance for lawmakers that want to take steps to deter online predation on what type of statute would withstand a First Amendment challenge.
Read the original:
Supreme Court Declares First Amendment Interest in Access to Social Networks - JD Supra (press release)
- Trump Media files for 'Crypto Blue Chip ETF' with SEC - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- The CEO of the social network X, Linda Yaccarino, has resigned - Zamin.uz - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Positive attitudes toward AI linked to more prone to problematic social media use - PsyPost - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Social media use linked to depression risk in preteens - theweek.in - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Misinformation lends itself to social contagion heres how to recognize and combat it - The Conversation - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Halifax breaks silence after customers wake up to 'distressing' message in app - Birmingham Live - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Social Networking Market to Reach USD 209.82 Billion by 2030, - openPR.com - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- You cant pause the internet: social media creators hit by burnout - The Guardian - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- 'The Social Network' is getting a sequel. Here's our dream cast. - Business Insider - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Return of The Social Network - Splice Today - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Quentin Tarantino Said the Best Movie of the 2010s Is This Andrew Garfield Drama With 96% on Rotten Tomatoes - Comic Book Resources - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- What is doxing? A glimpse into the battle for anonymity on social media - EL PAS English - July 6th, 2025 [July 6th, 2025]
- Inside Zuckerbergs Meta: How the Company is Reshaping Social Media and the Metaverse - Vocal - July 4th, 2025 [July 4th, 2025]
- ICEBlock climbs to the top of the App Store charts after officials slam it - Engadget - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Self-regulation has proven a failure: Brazilian leaders defend the need for social media regulation - Poynter - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- I Never Thought I'd Say This But We Really Need The Social Network 2 Right Now - TheGamer - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- World Social Media Day 2025: Celebrating Connection & Creativity - The Bridge Chronicle - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- World Social Media Day 2025: From Orkut Scraps to Instagram Reels The Evolution of Online Networking in India - BizzBuzz - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Brenda Song opens up about Disney's restriction for her role in 'The Social Network' - Geo.tv - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Social media reacts to jibe at players over fixture schedule - Yahoo Sports - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Iran using social media to recruit spies at scale, former Mossad official warns - The Telegraph - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Can you turn off generative AI from social media and your phone? - RNZ - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Meet 19 startups in social networking, dating, and AI that investors have their eyes on - Business Insider - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- She Ripped German Conservatives on Social Media. They Didnt Forget. - The New York Times - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Social Network Sequel in the Works With Aaron Sorkin Writing, Directing for Sony - The Hollywood Reporter - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- How Jesse Eisenberg Can Crush His (Potential) Role in The Social Network Part II - Hey Alma - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Authorities arrest fugitive who police say posted on social media following New Orleans jailbreak - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- The Social Network Sequel in the Works, Directed by Aaron Sorkin - Variety - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- In Alabama, a Social Media Influencer Really Gets Wild - The New York Times - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Brenda Song Says Disney Didnt Want Her Acting in Gran Torino and The Social Network. She Fought Back: This Is the Opportunity of a Lifetime - Variety - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- The Social Network 2 Is Missing The Best Part Of The First Movie's 96% RT Success - Screen Rant - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Aaron Sorkin will direct a sequel to 'The Social Network' inspired by The Facebook Files - Business Insider - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Aaron Sorkin is making a sequel to The Social Network - The Verge - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Nine Pressing Questions About The Social Network Part II - The Ringer - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- The Social Network Part II Is Coming and Aaron Sorkin Is Taking on a New Role - Gizmodo - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Maximization style and social media addiction linked to relationship obsessive compulsive disorder - PsyPost - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Sequel to The Social Network on the way - Boing Boing - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- Aaron Sorkin and Sony working on The Social Network sequel - Screen Daily - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- The Social Network Part II in the works - NME - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- The Social Network Sequel Is Finally Happening After a 15-Year Wait, But With 1 Big Change - Comic Book Resources - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- The Social Network Part II Is Happening, And Facebook Probably Wont Like It - Kotaku - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- The Social Network sequel in the works; Aaron Sorkin to direct - Daijiworld - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- The Social Network Part II in the Works with Aaron Sorkin Writing and Directing - Yahoo - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- A Social Network Sequel Is Finally Happening, But There's One Big Problem - SlashFilm - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- 'The Social Network Part II' Is Happening. It's an Even Bigger Deal Than You Think. - Esquire - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Social Network 2 - The Social Network 2 is officially in the works, and here's what we know so far - Cosmopolitan India - Cosmopolitan India - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- The Social Network 2 Is in the Works With a Script by Aaron Sorkin - Us Weekly - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Another Facebook movie is coming, and it's gonna be dark - SFGATE - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- The Social Network Part II In The Works At Sony Aaron Sorkin To Write And Direct - empireonline.com - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Are we ready for Aaron Sorkins The Social Network Part II? - Flickering Myth - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- The Social Network sequel officially in the works after 15 year wait - uk.news.yahoo.com - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Sorkin & Fincher: The Internet Was Immaterial To The Social Networks Appeal - Hollywood Outbreak - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- The Social Network Part 2 is in the Works - Zinc 96.1 FM - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Social Media Schemes: How Beijing Uses Influencers to Grow Power from Within - Vision Times - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Aaron Sorkin Working On The Social Network Part II Everything We Know So Far - 9meters - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- The Social Network Part II In the Works: Aaron Sorkin Returning, Early Plot Hints Revealed - Just Jared - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Australia regulator and YouTube spar over under-16s social media ban - The Hindu - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Govt Forms Special Cyber Team to Curb Hate Speech on Social Media During Muharram - tribal news network - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- Alex Rodriguezs Girlfriend Jaclyn Cordeiro Lights Up Social Media With Last Day of School Smiles With Her Daughters - PFSN - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- LinkedIn or left out?: Columbia students weigh in on the platforms influence - Columbia Daily Spectator - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Fans send love to Guy Fieri after heartbreaking post on social media - SILive.com - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- New State Privacy and Minor Social Media Laws to Become Effective in July - Inside Privacy - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- FDD Uncovers Large Iranian Network Impersonating Israelis on Social Media - Foundation for Defense of Democracies - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- US resumes visas for foreign students but demands access to social media accounts - ABC News - Breaking News, Latest News and Videos - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Influencer's VERY rude behaviour on board 10-hour-flight has social media in uproar - Daily Mail - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Some members of England womens soccer team to avoid social media during tournaments due to damaging online abuse - CNN - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- David Rafferty (opinion): What is a successful salary for Gen Z? - CT Insider - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Effect of emotional intelligence on problematic mobile social media use: mediating role of peer relationships and experiential avoidance - Frontiers - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- When it comes to peoples identity on social media, which of the below comes closest to what you think should happen? - YouGov UK - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Reddit vs. Nextdoor: Which Social Network Stock Has the Edge? - Zacks Investment Research - June 20th, 2025 [June 20th, 2025]
- Future unclear for Province couple who found kidney on social media - InMaricopa - June 18th, 2025 [June 18th, 2025]
- Social media and connecting with our community - The Royal Society of Chemistry - June 18th, 2025 [June 18th, 2025]
- Reddit vs. Nextdoor: Which Social Network Stock Has the Edge? - Yahoo Finance - June 18th, 2025 [June 18th, 2025]
- Midwest Travel Network brings social media influencers to Grand Island historical attractions - KSNB - June 18th, 2025 [June 18th, 2025]
- Mark Zuckerberg Declares the End of Social Media as We Know It, and Unveils Whats Coming Next in the Digital World - Indian Defence Review - June 18th, 2025 [June 18th, 2025]
- Social media claims of ICE raids in OKC disputed by law enforcement, lawmakers - KOKH - June 18th, 2025 [June 18th, 2025]
- Meet The Leftwing Activist Using Social Media To Funnel Riot Gear To Anti-ICE Protests - The Daily Wire - June 18th, 2025 [June 18th, 2025]
- "Social media is high on our priority list" - Adam Silver debunks the narrative for the NBA's low TV ratings while also addressing social... - June 18th, 2025 [June 18th, 2025]
- South Brunswick Board of Education VP Removed from Committees Due to Social Media Posts on Halal Foods - TAPinto - June 7th, 2025 [June 7th, 2025]
- How social media is giving wings to upward mobility dreams, spurring sexual abuse - The Federal - June 7th, 2025 [June 7th, 2025]