A vicious culture war is tearing through Wikipedia – Wired.co.uk
Getty Images / Wikipedia / WIRED
In July 2019 an anonymous Wikipedia editor added a line to the article about Jai Shri Ram, a Hindi expression that translates as Glory to Lord Rama. The editor made what would prove to be an extremely controversial addition, noting the phrase was also used as a war cry.
The edit was the first in a struggle that raged for more than a year, with one side claiming it constituted a form of Hinduphobia and the other side saying it was an accurate portrayal of the religious term, which had been embraced by Indias ruling party BJP and, according to some in the media, had become a dog whistle for nationalists.
The edit war spilled over to other articles on Wikipedia, including one about the 2020 Delhi riots. There, the claim that the war cry was part of a rising trend of beating up Muslims and forcing them to chant Jai Shri Ram by violent Hindu mobs in India, was also noted. The edit to the original page also claimed this trend became more prominent after the Hindu nationalist Narendra Modi was re-elected as Prime Minister of India.
In fact, it was only when Modis nationalist BJP party was reelected, that Manisha, a student from Mumbai who edits Wikipedia under the username Papayadaily, started to notice what she calls widespread anti-Hindu bias on Wikipedia.
Every article on Wikipedia is against the ruling party, and whitewashes the Indian National Congress, she says, referencing the former ruling party which, under the leadership of Mahatma Gandhi, led the country to independence in 1947. There are even conspiracy theories that there is involvement by members of the Congress, as every article is in their favour, she says.
Another editor, Raj Aryan, who edits under the username Factual Indian Hindu, says that the page for Modi is full of criticism, while that for Rahul Gandhi is full of praise.
I dont side with any party, says Minisha, who identifies as anti-left. This is not a liberal versus conservative debate. Its about hatred and lies and propaganda, she says. Sometimes articles I follow will be changed within minutes. It makes me think this editing is funded effort by either communists or religious minorities. The latter is a thinly-veiled euphemism for the countrys Muslim community, which makes about 15 per cent of the population and is being increasingly targeted by Modis right-wing government. The claims against Wikipedia show how facts are being weaponised as part of Indias political struggle.
Aryan runs FactualHindu, an Instagram account that flags examples of Wikipedias purported bias on social media. Its not just articles about Modi and the BJP that editors like these see as skewed: recently, Aryan lambasted Wikipedia over an article about an early Indian nationalist leader, Subhas Chandra Bose, which the encyclopaedia had labeled a radical.
Such perceived slights seem to strike a chord with some Indian editors, who have now made it their mission to seek out instances of the alleged prejudice across Wikipedia. Wikipedia pages are defaming the Indian culture and its roots, Aryan says, claiming the Wikipedia page for Christianity and Islam were positive, while that for Hinduism was negative and stressed issues like casteism instead of the more progressives sides of the faith.
Allegations of political biases on the part of volunteer-run Wikipedia are common. The open encyclopaedia, now entering its twentieth year, has been accused of partiality by figures on both the left and the right of the political spectrum across the world with regularity.
This trend is worrying to another Indian editor called Subhashish who sees these campaigns as an attempt to tarnish Wikipedia. The fact is that Wikipedia is not a singular body, but a collective and therefore has many many biases. For him, the goal should be to fix these biases, rather than criticising the whole project. Instead, he says, we are seeing political leaders accusing Wikipedia of spreading false information.
Some BJP officials have been vocally opposed to the free encyclopaedia. In August 2020, when Wikipedia began its annual fundraising drive, Nupur Sharma, the BJPs national spokesperson, tweeted the site was no longer neutral and known to carry fake info. She also suggested Wikipedia had been completely taken over by a certain cabal. Others on social media claimed Wikipedia has an anti-Hindu and even anti-India bias, in what local media called a campaign against the open encyclopaedia.
Wikipedia has long been popular in India. In 2011, Hindi Wikipedia, written in the local Devanagari script, became the first non-English Wikipedia to pass 100,000 articles and as of this year received more than 47 million page views. However, English is the main language in which readers in India access and edit Wikipedia. Today, traffic from the subcontinent accounts for roughly five per cent of all the traffic to English Wikipedia. So far this year India is the fourth country by traffic to English Wikipedia compared to seventh in 2017, and tenth in 2012.
Three local editors say that in recent months, there has been a push by the right wing to prove Wikipedia has a particular bias, as Subhashish puts it. Wikipedia articles on everything from Brahmanism and Islamophobia in India, to Jai Shri Ram and the 2020 Delhi riots have been beset by massive edit wars.
Even the article for a local Hindu guru deemed not notable enough for a Wikipedia page a common occurrence caused a stir when deleted, as the gurus followers took to social media to cry foul.
Wikipedia articles on Indian culture, history, and entertainment have also been pulled into the fray. In recent weeks, the most viewed celebrity death on English Wikipedia has been not of RBG, but rather SSR or Sushant Singh Rajput, a Bollywood star whose suicide has inspired massive public attention in India. In a weird turn of events, SSRs suicide also spawned political conspiracy theories on social media, which are spreading like a wildfire in Indias increasingly polarised and politicised society and inevitably spilled to Wikipedia, too.
When Covid-19 hit India, these tensions reached boiling point. It was an article about the origin of the viruss spread in the country that finally thrust Wikipedia into the centre of Indias culture wars. The article is about what is now termed the Tablighi Jamaat coronavirus hotspot in Delhi. It was first created in April, and focuses on a mosque that hosted an event at the beginning of March for the local Muslim community. The mosque later became the focal point of religious and social tensions in India, with many accusing the event of being the actual origin of the viruss spread in the country.
As the highly contested article now carefully states, the religious congregation of the Sunni sect of Tablighi Jamaat in Delhi was a coronavirus super-spreader event, with more than 4,000 confirmed cases and at least 27 deaths linked to the event reported across the country.
The events Wikipedia page became a perfect storm of religious acrimony, political hate-mongering and Covid-19 misinformation. Claims by Hindu politicians that the local Muslim community was to blame for the viruss spread in India, or that Islamic leadership was not doing enough to stop it, grew rampant both on the Wikipedia article and offline. Questionable reports that claimed Muslims had refused to let cops and health officials enter the building to conduct medical examination were noted in the article and stoked tensions around a possibly true statement that the mosque had failed to properly follow social distancing procedures.
Conversely, claims that Muslims were now being targeted in vengeance for the mosque super-spreader event also started to appear in the article. The government hospital in Rajasthans Bharatpur refused to admit to pregnant Muslim woman citing her religion, one edit claimed, showing the tit-for-tat dynamic such articles can take even when their tone is neutral.
Alongside factual information added by regular editors, more politically driven users dragged the article into racist infighting. One deleted version briefly claimed that Muslims arriving at a local medical centre, created a ruckus [...] claiming that the government wants to kill them. Citing unsubstantiated reports by right-wing media, this version claimed that in the hospital, members of the community were seen molesting nurses and spitting on hospital staff... [and even] reportedly found defecating in the hospital corridor.
With editing reaching fever pitch, it became clear no compromise or consensus could be reached, and it was decided to put the articles very existence to a vote. The article was deleted in a highly controversial move that further highlighted how toxic the discourse had become.
There is a lot of reliable coverage of this Islamic religious gathering contributing to the spread of Covid-19 in India, the final decision said, noting that there was a factual basis to the articles existence. At the same time, there are a lot of tensions between Hindus and Muslims in India, and there is also increasing state-sanctioned Islamophobia and persecution of Muslims in India. The issue of Covid-19, was highly volatile and rife with misinformation and keeping the article, it was feared, could have a disruptive impact on the real world.
Contributing to the storm around the article was the fact that its first version was written by an undisclosed paid editor (for-profit editing is only allowed if disclosed in the edit) who has since been banned from the project. To make matters worse, the deletion was reversed in a subsequent vote on April 10, sparking another edit war.
The page spun so out of control that Jimmy Wales, Wikipedias co-founder, waded into the controversy after being called out about the article on Twitter. Wales was accused of taking bribes from Muslims to have the article deleted, and spent some time explaining on Twitter how Wikipedia works to an army of critics. After he called the article poorly written and with zero sources, he pleaded, this isnt about religious sentiments, its about not putting junk into Wikipedia. (Waless press office did not respond to a request for comment about the controversy by the time of publication.)
The ability to maintain what Wikipedians call good faith was gone. After Waless comments and what seemed to be his foreign interference on an Indian issue on behalf of a minority the article began making headlines in India. The Times of India, Indias paper of record and most reliable news source, reported on Wikipedias battle against communalism editing that promoted tribalism over facticity just when reliable information regarding Covid-19 was needed most.
One outlet stood out: OpIndia, a conservative news site that hosts opinion pieces, launched a de facto campaign against Wikipedia and has even interviewed Wikipedias other co-founder-cum-critic Larry Sanger, about Wikipedias left-wing bias. The tensions relating to religious, geopolitical and social views is an ongoing occurrence and such tussles are going to stay no matter what the current issue is. What is really unfortunate is that we have an immoral political environment here in India, says Subhashish, who believes it is a lack of understanding of Wikipedia either due to ignorance or intentional that is the cause of the problem. He blames the media environment and politicians that he says are threatening to ban Wikipedia like they did in China.
Claims that Wikipedia has a liberal bias have long gone hand-in-hand with campaigns by media outlets displeased with the encyclopaedia. Conservapedia was set up in 2009 to provide a more evangelical-friendly version of the encyclopaedia for Americans reluctant to accept what mainstream sources say about climate change and evolution. After The Daily Mail was deprecated as a source on Wikipedia, it too joined a growing chorus of right-wing criticism of Wikipedia. In recent years, Breitbart has also focused on the issue.
Now OpIndia seems to have picked up the mantle, reporting to its readers about a recent decision to downgrade the status of Fox News as a source on Wikipedia. Wikipedia is clearly being politicised by a particular group of people who identify themselves as left-liberal, an OpIndia spokesperson says. They add that the Wikipedias bias can manifest as anti-Hindu on a few occasions, but the bias is not anti-Hindu primarily.
Even Manisha, the editor worried about Wikipedias anti-Hindu bias, agrees the situation has gone too far. She says that the pro-BJP media outlets like OpIndia, that initially helped her call attention to anti-Hindu biases on Wikipedia, are now part of the problem. Initially, people werent aware of how many articles Wikipedia has against a single community in India, she says, referencing the Hindu community. In wake of their work, people started to read and fact check Wikipedia, which is good. But nowadays they sometimes exaggerate, she says.
They report about issues that are not really issues and then people come to edit articles and make them worse. So theres this polarisation and the grey area gets left behind, Manisha says. Everything is now polarised, everything is left or right and there is no common ground.
Not every country treated the pandemic the same did Swedens Covid-19 experiment work?
This AI Telegram bot has been abusing thousands of women
Apples new phones have arrived: Should you get the iPhone 12 or iPhone 12 Pro?
Listen to The WIRED Podcast, the week in science, technology and culture, delivered every Friday
Follow WIRED on Twitter, Instagram, Facebook and LinkedIn
Get WIRED Daily, your no-nonsense briefing on all the biggest stories in technology, business and science. In your inbox every weekday at 12pm UK time.
by entering your email address, you agree to our privacy policy
Thank You. You have successfully subscribed to our newsletter. You will hear from us shortly.
Sorry, you have entered an invalid email. Please refresh and try again.
View post:
A vicious culture war is tearing through Wikipedia - Wired.co.uk
- Reliable Sources: How Wikipedia Admin David Gerard Launders His Grudges Into the Public Record - World Religion News - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Wikipedia and the Digital Services Act: Lessons on the strength of community and the future of internet regulation - Le Taurillon - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Depths Of Wikipedia: This Page Is Dedicated To The Weird Side Of Wikipedia (97 New Pics) - AOL - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Longest-Running Hoax Remained Online for Almost 10 Years: The Story of Jar'Edo Wens - The Journal - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- 40 Times People Found Such Hilarious Gems On Wikipedia, They Just Had To Share (New Pics) - Bored Panda - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- People only just learning hidden Wikipedia function that makes site easier to read - The Mirror - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Joe Hendry Corrects Wikipedia They Dont Believe In Me - eWrestlingNews - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Should the Reliability of Wikipedia Be Questioned for the Jewish Community? - The Times of Israel - August 27th, 2024 [August 27th, 2024]
- Rene Gonzalez's office under investigation following Wikipedia spending - KOIN.com - August 27th, 2024 [August 27th, 2024]
- The Wikipedia of medicine is in Quebec, and its growing fast! - CityNews Montreal - August 27th, 2024 [August 27th, 2024]
- George Russell Takes on the Wikipedia Challenge - Autosport - August 18th, 2024 [August 18th, 2024]
- Why All Roads Of Inquiry Lead To Wikipedia : 1A - NPR - August 18th, 2024 [August 18th, 2024]
- Wikipedia Edit-a-Thon Helps Close the Information Gaps on Santa Barbaras History - Santa Barbara Independent - August 18th, 2024 [August 18th, 2024]
- George Russell Takes on the Wikipedia Challenge - Mercedes-AMG PETRONAS F1 Team - August 18th, 2024 [August 18th, 2024]
- Wikipedia Deletes J.D. Vances Wartime Medals and Awards - Shore News Network - August 18th, 2024 [August 18th, 2024]
- Toyin Abraham: X users report her to Netflix, tag her as bully on Wikipedia page - Legit.ng - July 14th, 2024 [July 14th, 2024]
- From Wikipedia to The Great: 10 Medieval Studies Articles Published Last Month - Medievalists.net - June 12th, 2024 [June 12th, 2024]
- Ethereum researcher alleges Wikipedia of biased Solana coverage - Crypto Briefing - May 22nd, 2024 [May 22nd, 2024]
- Link Rot and Digital Decay on Government, News and Other Webpages - Pew Research Center - May 22nd, 2024 [May 22nd, 2024]
- El Paso librarian takes love of knowledge to Wikipedia - El Paso Inc. - May 22nd, 2024 [May 22nd, 2024]
- Assassin's Creed Shadows 'critics' have started vandalising IRL protagonist Yasuke's Wiki page - GAMINGbible - May 22nd, 2024 [May 22nd, 2024]
- People Are Vandalizing the Wikipedia Page for Assassin's Creed Shadows Protagonist Yasuke - GameRant - May 22nd, 2024 [May 22nd, 2024]
- Assassin's Creed Shadows sparks Wikipedia edit war over Yasuke - Niche Gamer - May 22nd, 2024 [May 22nd, 2024]
- Made J. Cole look like he died in the war: Drake vs Kendrick Lamar Rap Battle Gets a World War 2 Styled Wikipedia ... - FandomWire - May 7th, 2024 [May 7th, 2024]
- Mastodon Play 'Wikipedia: Fact or Fiction?' - Loudwire - March 30th, 2024 [March 30th, 2024]
- Wolff contacted Verstappen to explain Wikipedia statement - GPblog - March 30th, 2024 [March 30th, 2024]
- George Washington Masonic Memorial photo honored in Wikipedia photo competition - ALXnow - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- In the War for Narratives Iran's Regime Takes to Wikipedia - NCRI - National Council of Resistance of Iran (NCRI) - January 22nd, 2024 [January 22nd, 2024]
- Kayla Braxton furious over wrong Wikipedia update, shares reaction - Sportskeeda - December 23rd, 2023 [December 23rd, 2023]
- Why Wikipedia's highway editors took the exit ramp. - Slate - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Dive into the weird and wonderful Depths of Wikipedia - WBUR News - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- The 25 Most Popular Wikipedia Pages of 2023 - Mentalfloss - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- ChatGPT is Wikipedia's most-viewed article in 2023 - CoinGeek - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- These are the most read entries on Wikipedia in 2023: atomic bombs and much more. - Softonic EN - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Wikipedias Most-Viewed Articles of 2023 Revealed - Greek Reporter - December 14th, 2023 [December 14th, 2023]
- Watching the Napoleon Movie? Don't Forget to Read His Wikipedia Page. - Slate - November 24th, 2023 [November 24th, 2023]
- Crowdsourced fact-checking fights misinformation in Taiwan ... - Cornell Chronicle - November 24th, 2023 [November 24th, 2023]
- The Sunday Read: 'Wikipedia's Moment of Truth' - The New York Times - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- 'The more vibrant the society, the more actors seek to influence Wikipedia' - Ynetnews - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- SOMEONE Keeps Editing Joshua Wright's Wikipedia Page To Downplay The Whole 'Sleeping With 1Ls' Thing - Above the Law - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Why Wikipedia is so imperative for public relations - PR Daily - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- More Wikipedia taunts as Max Verstappen erases a Lewis Hamilton World title - Yahoo Eurosport UK - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Local Teacher Becomes First Malaysian To Win Wikimedian Award ... - The Rakyat Post - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- Wikipedia's Moment of Truth - The New York Times - September 11th, 2023 [September 11th, 2023]
- The shocking truth about Wikipedias Holocaust disinformation - Forward - June 20th, 2023 [June 20th, 2023]
- New Mall-Based Minnesota Kohls Store Coming in 2024 | Joel ... - NewsBreak Original - June 20th, 2023 [June 20th, 2023]
- Open Access Makes Research More Widely Cited, Helping Spread ... - Techdirt - June 20th, 2023 [June 20th, 2023]
- Russia fines Wikipedia owner for failing to delete Azov battalion content - Ifax - Yahoo News - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- Interviewing Jimmy Wales, Cofounder of Wikipedia - Reason - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- Purple Speedy Boyfriend Wikipedia: Who Is Purplespeedy Dating? - PKBnews.in - June 7th, 2023 [June 7th, 2023]
- How Conflicts and Population Loss Led to the Rise of English ... - Political Science Now - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Research Article: Wikipedia and Open Access (preprint) - LJ INFOdocket - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Who Was Kuaron Harvey Cousin Paris Harvey? Wikipedia And Age - PKBnews.in - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Opinion | The Impossible Math of the Debt Deal's Detractors - The New York Times - May 29th, 2023 [May 29th, 2023]
- Wikipedia Grapples With Chatbots: Should It Allow Their Use For ... - Techdirt - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Stephen Joness deleted rugby 7s article leads to hilarious wikipedia update | RugbyDump - RugbyDump - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Bradley Dack is the kind of football hero that cannot be judged on a ... - Football365 - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- Who is Roxy Horner? Jack Whitehall's Girlfriend Age, Wikipedia And ... - PKBnews.in - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- The Unspeakable Death of the 'Almighty Dollar' - Resilience - May 20th, 2023 [May 20th, 2023]
- WikiBias: How Wikipedia erases fringe theories and enforces conformity - Minding The Campus - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Online Safety Bill age checks? We won't do 'em, says Wikipedia - The Register - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Russian court fines Wikipedia over Ukraine invasion article - Verdict - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Wikipedia names Howie Roseman 'master of all the draft' - Yardbarker - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Don't rely on sites like Wikipedia to write verdicts: Madras HC - Times of India - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Amazon, Bing, Wikipedia make EU's list of 'Very Large' platforms - The Register - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- Who Is Patty Raynes? Net Worth 2023, Wikipedia And Age Details ... - PKBnews.in - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- What After Xi Jinpings Overture to Zelensky? - IDN InDepthNews | Analysis That Matters - May 2nd, 2023 [May 2nd, 2023]
- New study rejects research suggestions that Wikipedia content shapes High Court judgments - The Irish Times - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- The Wikipedia fight over Poland's role in the Holocaust sparks death threats against an Ottawa professor - The Canadian Jewish News - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Who were March's most newsworthy celebrities, according to the ... - KTVZ - April 19th, 2023 [April 19th, 2023]
- Twitter using Wikipedia to decide what is 'government-funded media' - Business Insider - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Practical Apps: Wikipedia Looking Smart To Go | Spotlight ... - highcountryshopper.com - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Rob Kearney receives Wikipedia edit after Joe Biden's All Blacks blunder - Rugby OnSlaught - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Editor's notes: Nut drivers - Bryan County News - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Top 5 Kart Games of the 90's - Twin Galaxies - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Things to do in the UAE this week: Ramadan shopping festival ... - The National - April 13th, 2023 [April 13th, 2023]
- Wikipedia had the wrong Vatican City flag for years. Now incorrect flags are everywhere - Catholic News Agency - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Texas ruling to ban abortion pills nationwide gets basic facts wrong: experts - Business Insider - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- Hashtag Trending Apr.5th- Wikipedias new logo, $20 billion to revive Intel, Fake ransomware attacks - IT World Canada - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]
- ChatGPT and GPT4: Wikipedia 2.0 or a fresh starting point for society? - IT-Online - April 11th, 2023 [April 11th, 2023]