Future Historians Will Rely on Wikipedias COVID-19 Coverage – Slate Magazine
Photo illustration by Slate. Image via Wikipedia.
Welcome to Source Notes, a Future Tense column about the internets knowledge ecosystem.
In March, Facebook was filled with posts that claimed that 5G networks, not a novel coronavirus, were making people sick. Yet searching for those same posts today leads to an error message: Sorry, this content isnt available right now. Thats because Facebook and other social media companies have removed many conspiracy-type posts from their platforms, including the thoroughly debunked 5G connection. But some internet activists are concerned that this pandemic-related content is not only being removed but erased, leaving future researchers with a gap-filled historical record.
Enter Wikipedia. In April, 75 signatory organizations sent a letter asking social media companies and content-sharing platforms to preserve all data that they have blocked or removed during the COVID-19 pandemic and make it available for future research. The letters recipients included Facebook, Twitter, Google, and the Wikimedia Foundation, the parent organization of Wikipedia. When Wikipedia editors discussed the letter among themselves in forums like Wikipedia Weekly, the most common reaction was, Dont we already do this?
Over the past few months, Wikipedias coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic has been widely praised for its breadth and relative trustworthiness. To date, the main English Wikipedia article about the pandemic has been viewed more than 67 million times, and COVID-19 articles exist in 175 languages. The 5,000 articles related to COVID-19 cover everything from Anthony Faucis peers across the world, to the resulting global economic crisis (e.g., German Wirtschaftskrise and its Arabic counterpart), to a somewhat circular Wikipedia article about Wikipedias own response to the pandemic.
But todays wealth of Wikipedia content will also be valuable to future parties. As scholar and Wikimedia program coordinator Liam Wyatt writes, the text in Wikipedias archive will be of interest to linguists, historians or sociologists of the year 4000. In an interview, Katherine Maher, chief executive officer and executive director of the Wikimedia Foundation, told me, One of the things that historians will find valuable is the way Wikipedia documents the rate of acceleration of understanding the virus itself.
For example, a future historian looking back on Wikipedias coverage of the COVID-19 pandemic this year would likely review the relevant diffs. Every Wikipedia article, and every revision to it, is saved even if the edit is relatively minor or short-lived. The diff shows the difference between one version and another of a Wikipedia page, allowing anybody to see exactly what changed between two precisely time-stamped moments. The diffs for the Wikipedia article about the COVID-19 pandemic include this one on Jan. 7 noting the first suspicions that the virus had an animal source, and this one on Jan. 8 with the first use of novel coronavirus. More recently, this diff shows the first insertion of the word bleach on April 29, after comments from President Donald Trump. A historian could use Wikipedias diffs to construct a case about how knowledge about COVID-19 evolved throughout 2020.
Researchers in the future could also learn from debates among editors. Each Wikipedia article has a discussion page where editors can participate in conversations about building the encyclopedia. Throughout April and early May, Wikipedias volunteer editors engaged in a lengthy discussion about renaming the article from 20192020 coronavirus pandemic to its current name COVID-19 pandemic. Notice how the new name identifies the virus specifically and drops the time range. What might this renaming signify to a future historian? Its impossible to know, of course, but one interpretation is that this was an early recognition that this pandemic could last until 2021 and beyond.
Future researchers will struggle more with historical data from social media companies. In March, Facebook, Twitter, and YouTube removed videos from their platforms in which Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro said that the drug hydroxychloroquine was an effective treatment for COVID-19. While this helped stop the spread of medical misinformation on those platforms, the deletion of the posts (and all associated comments and metadata) makes it more difficult for researchers to understand how the public engaged with that misleading content before it was taken down. In the past, these companies have not disclosed data on deleted posts, even after the fact, as they consider such information proprietary.
And its not just big tech companies that are purging the future historical record. Woody Harrelson and John Cusack posted support for the 5G coronavirus conspiracy theory before voluntarily deleting those posts from Twitter and Instagram. And some journalists have begun routinely deleting their old tweets in order to reduce the risk of online harassment, a practice the Columbia Journalism Review characterized as erasing the first draft of history. But Wikipedia is less likely to be accused of this historical erasure since, with few exceptions, the software preserves the projects entire edit history.
Preservation is Wikipedias strong suit, but a long-term challenge for the project is the issue of systemic bias. Largely unintentional bias can be seen in the encyclopedias biographical articles (more than 80 percent male) and the disproportionate number of articles about sci-fi and technical topics (mirroring the preferences of the sites earliest contributors). We know that when original source material is biased, this limits the understanding of future researchers, who will ask questions millennia later like Where are all the women in ancient philosophy?
But todays Wikipedia supercontributors are keen to ensure that future historians will have access to a better archive. Comprehensive coverage was a recurring theme at this months virtual symposium on Wikipedia and COVID-19 organized by Wikimedia NYC, which featured prolific volunteers like Jason Moore. Moore has been documenting the pandemic in real time from many viewpoints, starting articles about the pandemics impacts in various U.S.states, the LGBTQ community, and discrete sectors like the cannabis industry. Another presenter at the symposium, Lane Rasberry of the University of Virginia, demonstrated how Wikidata can visually represent outbreaks of the virus on a world map. Because this language is machine-readable, it can be filtered out immediately from the central hub of Wikidata into the various language editions of Wikipedia. But Rasberry cautioned that this wiki outbreak data overrepresented North America and Europe and underrepresented places with fewer wiki editors. Thats just the way its working for now, he said.
Then again, future researchers may be able to account for some geographic distortions so long as the original record is still accessible. After the symposium, presenter Netha Hussain described an article she started on English-language Wikipedia called Misinformation related to the 2020 coronavirus pandemic in India. But if you search Wikipedia for that article today, you will not find it. Thats because other Wikipedia editors voted to delete the page on May 6. (The pro-delete group argued that it was improper for India to have a separate article for misinformation when other countries did not.) The article about misinformation in India is not completely lost to posterity, however, and unlike social media companies, Wikipedia is not claiming that it retains ownership of deleted content. These deleted articles can be viewed by Wikipedias volunteer administrators, and Hussain has also saved a copy of the deleted article about India and the editorial discussion about its deletion. Perhaps a future historian will someday comb through this discussion to better understand how editors responded to allegations of a corona jihad, a false narrative that has led to persecution of Indias Muslim minority.
Interestingly (at least to me!), these hypothetical future researchers would be using Wikipedia as a primary source. That may sound heretical, given that librarians and educators have been reminding us for nearly 20 years that Wikipedia is not a primary source, not a secondary source, but a tertiary source. Thats why Wikipedia has a handy help page to remind readers that you probably shouldnt be citing Wikipedia. But citing Wikipedia as a primary source makes sense in a future state where enough time has passed that todays Wikipedia revisions have become a historical artifact. Imagining this distant future presents an interesting thought exercise not only for Wikipedians but for other creators of online content: How might this digital media someday be interpreted as a revealing artifact from this period of distress and disease?
Future Tense is a partnership of Slate, New America, and Arizona State University that examines emerging technologies, public policy, and society.
See more here:
Future Historians Will Rely on Wikipedias COVID-19 Coverage - Slate Magazine
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Roanoke Times - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- What we learned from Open AI whistleblower Suchir Balaji's Wikipedia Page - The Times of India - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- From an old version of the Wikipedia page for Warren G and N... - kottke.org - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - WCF Courier - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Encyclopedia of the Future: Why is Wikipedia Best Research Option? - Analytics Insight - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Most-Viewed Articles of 2024: Politics, Football, and...Death? - PCMag Middle East - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Taxiride Fallout Continues Over Alleged Amendments To Band Wikipedia Page - The Music - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Delhi High Court to examine Caravan, Ken articles to decide interim relief in ANI vs Wikipedia - Bar & Bench - Indian Legal News - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Boriswave Wikipedia page set up in reference to immigration surge under ex-PM - The London Economic - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Wikipedia suspends pro-Palestine editors coordinating efforts behind the scenes - The Jerusalem Post - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's 7-year yogurt spelling war was longer than three Shakespeare plays - Boing Boing - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia boyfriends on celebrating their mundane, anti-online corner of the internet - British GQ - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - York News-Times - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Most-Viewed Articles of 2024: Politics, Football, and...Death? - PCMag UK - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Martinsville Bulletin - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Death most popular thing on Wikipedia, again - Boing Boing - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Heres the top 25 list of most-viewed Wikipedia articles of 2024 - KXAN.com - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Here Are the Top 25 Wikipedia Searches for 2024 And #1 is BLEAK - Mediaite - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey hits out at Wikipedia for failing to set the record straight - The Independent - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Jimmy Wales on Why Wikipedia Is Still So Good - New York Magazine - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Here Are The 5 Most Read Wikipedia Pages In 2024 - The Spun - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia reveals its most searched posts - 97.1 The Ticket - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia just revealed what weve all been obsessing over in 2024 - Sherwood News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Terrible Towel Wikipedia page is a must-read yinzer masterpiece - PGH City Paper - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Most Popular Wikipedia Pages Of The Year - iHeart - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Neither Donald Trump nor Taylor Swift: This was the most-viewed Wikipedia page in the U.S. in 2024 - AS USA - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Winona Daily News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey Mad At Wikipedia, Claims He Was Never In The Nosebleeds Nor Slaughter And The Dogs - Stereogum - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Heres the top 25 list of most-viewed Wikipedia articles of 2024 - MSN - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Nosebleeds and Slaughter And The Dogs Band members list explored as Morrissey slams Wikipedia listing - Soap Central - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Diddy, Dune, and Donald Trump: The most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024 - STV News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- India's bollywood, elections, and IPL among top 10 most viewed articles on Wikipedia - The Tatva - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey says he has no connection with The Nosebleeds and Slaughter And The Dogs, despite claims on Wikipedia - NME - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia Called To Order By Samson Mow: The Urgency To Invest In Bitcoin - Cointribune EN - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and the ANI defamation suit | Explained - The Hindu - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- A Wikipedia for cells: researchers get an updated look at the Human Cell Atlas, and its remarkable - Nature.com - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- Opinion: Wikipedia has it out for Israel, and weve got the data to prove it - National Post - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- Who edits history? Politics and business in the pages of Wikipedia - EU Reporter - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- What your Wikipedia reading says about you: Study find different styles - The New Daily - November 14th, 2024 [November 14th, 2024]
- Going down a Wikipedia rabbit hole? Science says youre one of these three types - The Conversation - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Studying Wikipedia browsing habits to learn how people learn - Penn Today - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Portland mayor candidate Rene Gonzalez violated rules by using public funds on Wikipedia page, auditor finds - Oregon Public Broadcasting - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Top 5 Editing Conflicts in Wikipedia Pages on Religion - Baptist News Global - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Wikipedia editors form urgent task force to combat rampant issues with recent wave of content: 'The entire thing was ... [a] hoax' - Yahoo! Voices - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Audit: Rene Gonzalez violated campaign finance law by using city funds to edit Wikipedia page - Fox 12 Oregon - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Auditor: Gonzalez violated the law by paying to update his Wikipedia entry - Portland Tribune - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Musk Says Wikipedia Controlled By Far-Left Activists, Urges People To Stop Donating To Them! - News24 - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 Remake Wikipedia page locked after salty fans try to rewrite its critically-acclaimed reception - Eurogamer - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- The Silent Hill 2 Remakes Wikipedia page briefly got transformed into a phantasmagorical reflection of the psyches of idiots unable to accept reality... - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Outrage as Wikipedia changes grooming gangs article to moral panic from the 'Far-Right' - GB News - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 Falls Victim to Faux Review Bombing on Wikipedia - DualShockers - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- No, you're not losing it, Silent Hill 2 Remake's Wikipedia page's review scores have been altered, and the site has had to lock it to stop people... - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Exploring (and building) the depths of Wikipedia - The Michigan Daily - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and Catholicism: Navigating Misinformation and Religious Bias - World Religion News - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Weird things are happening on the Silent Hill 2 remake Wikipedia page, as folks sabotage review scores for reasons - Sports Illustrated - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 Remake Wikipedia Page Locked After Fans Tried to Change Reviews - Rely on Horror - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Trolls Edit Silent Hill 2 Remake Wikipedia Page To Lower Its Review Scores - PlayStation Universe - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- The Kremlin is rewriting Wikipedia - Hindustan Times - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Wikipedia Locks Silent Hill 2 Remake Page After It's Spammed With Fake Negative Reviews - TheGamer - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 remake Wikipedia locked after getting trolled - NME - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Wikimedia Technology Summit 2024 brings together tech enthusiasts and developers to bring inclusivity to Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects - Business... - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- AI's threat to Wikipedia - ABC News - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 remake page on Wikipedia blocked after fans try to rewrite critics' positive reviews - ITC - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Matt Walsh Recalls Critics Trying to Get Him Arrested Using Wikipedia - The Daily Wire - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and Religion: Uncovering the Dynamics of Reliable Sources and Digital Bias - Baptist News Global - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Wikipedia: Accuracy or Prejudice? Islamophobia in the Web 2.0 Era - World Religion News - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Ultrarunner Camille Herron is dumped by Lululemon after her husband edited her rivals' Wikipedia pages to boos - Daily Mail - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Ultrarunner Camille Herrons Primary Sponsor Drops Her After Wikipedia Scandal - Runner's World - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Ultrarunner Camille Herron dropped by Lululemon following Wikipedia editing controversy - Runner's World UK - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Wikipedia relies on army of volunteers as it stares down AI - Devex - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- This Ultramarathon Runner Was Dropped By A Major Sponsor Amid A Wikipedia Editing Scandal - Women's Health - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Wikipedia scandal: Heres why ultrarunner Camille Herron was dropped by Lululemon - Women's Agenda - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Guess The Wikipedia Footballer #4: Can you name these 10 footballers that played under Carlo Ancelotti? - Planet Football - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- ANI vs Wikipedia: The free encyclopedias impact on India and more - The Hindu - September 16th, 2024 [September 16th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and AI: Could artificial intelligence kill the online encyclopedia? - Newstalk - September 16th, 2024 [September 16th, 2024]
- Reliable Sources: How Wikipedia Admin David Gerard Launders His Grudges Into the Public Record - World Religion News - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Wikipedia and the Digital Services Act: Lessons on the strength of community and the future of internet regulation - Le Taurillon - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Depths Of Wikipedia: This Page Is Dedicated To The Weird Side Of Wikipedia (97 New Pics) - AOL - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Longest-Running Hoax Remained Online for Almost 10 Years: The Story of Jar'Edo Wens - The Journal - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- 40 Times People Found Such Hilarious Gems On Wikipedia, They Just Had To Share (New Pics) - Bored Panda - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]