How Wikipedia will fight Election Day misinformation – nation.lk – The Nation Newspaper
2 hr 1 min agoHow Wikipedia will fight Election Day misinformation
From CNN Business' Kaya Yurieff
Staffers at Wikipedia's parent organization and the volunteer editors who maintain its millions of pages have a plan to ensure that election-related entries aren't improperly edited.
Last week, the Wikipedia community placed extended protections on the 2020 United States presidential election page, which means only experienced volunteers with at least 500 edits and 30 days on the platform can make changes. Other pages related to the election and presidential candidates already have protections, like the articles for Hunter Biden, the son of Democratic presidential nominee Joe Biden, Jared Kushner, President Donald Trumps son-in-law, and the pages for both the Trump and Biden campaigns.
Generally, anyone can go into an article and make a change, however, there are varying levels of protections for what Wikipedia calls contested pages, which range from political topics to more obscure subjects over which editors disagree.
There are over 70 English-language articles about the 2020 election, according to the Wikimedia Foundation, Wikipedia's parent. It said more articles may be protected as Election Day nears.
Editors will be monitoring a list of relevant articles on Election Day and beyond. If someone makes an edit to those pages, over 500 people will get an email alerting them that there could be something worth checking.
Wired previously reported that editors have been actively discussing what measures they are considering for election night on a public page.
Since late August, some Wikimedia staff have been running through different scenarios of what could happen on its site during the election, such as how it would handle malicious content or a coordinated attack by multiple accounts making edits across several Wikipedia pages on Election Day.
We are under no illusions that we will prevent every bad edit from making it onto the site," said Wikimedia chief of staff Ryan Merkley, who leads its new internal US election task force. "We think our responsibility is to make sure that we are as prepared to respond and that we can do it as swiftly as possible and ideally prevent its spread broadly.
From CNN Business' Kaya Yurieff
Ahead of Election Day, Instagram has moved to temporarily restrict a popular way to browse posts.
Instagram announced that it will temporarily hide the "Recent" tab from showing up on all hashtag pages whether they're related to politics or not. The company said it hopes the move will help prevent the spread of misinformation and harmful content related to the election.
Hashtag pages will still work, they'll just only show "Top Posts" as determined by the platform's algorithms. This may include some recent posts.
An Instagram spokesperson said the change was rolled out Thursday evening, and there is no specific timeline for when the action will end.
Other social platforms have also implemented similar temporary changes ahead of Election Day. For example, Twitter is encouraging users to quote tweet rather than to retweet, hoping people will add context or a reaction before spreading information.
From CNN Business' Donie OSullivan and Marshall Cohen
Twitter labeled a video from the Russian-state controlled broadcaster RT as election misinformation on Thursday.
RT is registered with the US Justice Department as an agent of the Russian government.It is the first time Twitter has taken action against RT for US election misinformation in this way, Twitter confirmed to CNN.
The four-minute video posted by RT was titled"Questionsmount amid voter fraud, rigging claims ahead of#USelection."
Twitter deactivated the retweet featured on the video, to reduce how much it can be shared, and slapped a label over it that read,"Someor all of the content shared in this Tweet is disputed and might be misleading about how to participate in an election or another civic process.
The Kremlin uses RT to spread English-language propaganda to American audiences, and was part of Russias election meddling in 2016, according to US intelligence agencies.
A report released by the US intelligence community in 2017 said RT has historically"portrayedthe US electoral process as undemocratic and amplifies false narratives claiming that"USelection results cannot be trusted.
The four-minute video that RT posted Thursday touches on many of these themes. It raises concerns aboutfraudand echoes many of the lies President Donald Trump has spread about mail-in voting. Their segment cites Fox News, which has championed many of Trumps attacks against the electoral process. It highlights isolated incidents of ballot mishaps, many of which have already been deemed by local authorities to be accidents and errors and not fraud.
Earlier this year, aninternalintelligence bulletinissued by the Department of Homeland Security said Russia was amplifying disinformation about mail-in voting as part of a broader effort "to undermine public trust in the electoral process."
CNN Business' Gabe Ramirez
Facebook has hired a network of fact-checkers across America. CNN talks to two who have received threats for simply doing their jobs during the 2020 election cycle.
CNN Business' Kaya Yurieff
Ted Cruz yelled. His Democratic colleague Brian Schatz called the hearing in which he was speaking "a sham." Committee chair Roger Wicker couldn't pronounce the last name of Google's CEO. Just another day on Capitol Hill for Big Tech.
In a contentious hearing on Wednesday, the CEOs of Facebook (FB), Google (GOOG) and Twitter (TWTR) were questioned by Senators on the Commerce Committee over their content moderation policies. Some demanded more transparency while others sought explanations on a few specific cases in which content was removed or labeled by platforms. Though the hearing was meant to focus on a crucial law, known as Section 230, that protects the companies' ability to moderate content as they see fit, Senators strayed from the brief and confronted the executives on other topics, including antitrust and election interference.
Schatz and other senators slammed the timing of hearing, which comes less than a week before the US election. "This is bullying and it is for electoral purposes," Schatz said. "Do not let the United States Senate bully you into carrying water for those who want to spread misinformation."
Cruz angrily went after Twitter CEO Jack Dorsey, pressing him on the platform's decision to restrict content posted by the New York Post. He concluded by shouting at Dorsey: "Mr. Dorsey, who the hell elected you and put you in charge of what the media are allowed to report and what the American people are allowed to hear, and why do you persist in behaving as a Democratic super PAC silencing views to the contrary of your political beliefs?"
CNN Business will cover the hearing live. You can read our updating coverage here.
From CNN Business' Brian Fung
TikTok said Wednesday it will reduce the distribution of claims of election victory before official results are confirmed by authoritative sources.
Eric Han, TikToks US head of safety, announced that premature claims of victory surrounding the 2020 election will be restricted if the Associated Press has not declared a result. Han also said the company is working with third-party fact-checkers who are on expedited call during this sensitive time."
"Out of an abundance of caution, if claims can't be verified or fact-checking is inconclusive, we'll limitdistribution of the content, Han addedin a blog post."We'll also add a banner pointing viewers to our election guide on contentwith unverifiable claims about voting, premature declarations of victory, or attempts to dissuade peoplefrom voting by exploiting COVID-19 as a voter suppression tactic."
The policy is similar to ones previously announced by other social media companies like Facebook and Twitter.
From CNN Business' Rishi Iyengar
One of Facebook's top executives in India where it has more users than anywhere else has resigned months after being linked to allegations of political bias and hate speech against the platform.
Ankhi Das, Facebook's head of public policy in India, allowed a politician from the country's ruling party to remain on its platform even though his anti-Muslim posts flouted its rules against hate speech, current and former Facebook employees told the Wall Street Journal in August. Das reportedly opposed banning the politician (which Facebook ultimately did weeks later) because doing so would hurt Facebook's business in the country.
"Ankhi has decided to step down from her role in Facebook to pursue her interest in public service," Ajit Mohan, the company's vice president and managing director in India, said in a statement. "We are grateful for her service and wish her the very best for the future."
Facebook has long faced controversies over harmful misinformation and hate speech in India, whose 600 million-plus internet users are increasingly important to its business as it's locked out of China and looks for future growth.
The Indian government has repeatedly called on Facebook to do more to curb misinformation, particularly on its mobile messaging platform WhatsApp, after viral hoaxes in 2018 were linked to more than a dozen lynchings.
WhatsApp misinformation may be finding its way into the upcoming US presidential election, with Reuters reporting that misleading messages about Democratic candidate Joe Biden have been making the rounds on the private messaging service particularly within the Indian-American community.
WhatsApp counts India as its largest market, with around 400 million users.
From CNN Business' Kaya Yurieff
A misleading video clip of Democratic presidential candidate Joe Biden has been spreading on social media without any warning labels since Saturday after having been promoted by members of President Donald Trump's inner circle.
In the 24-second clip from an interview with the podcast Pod Save America, which is hosted by four former members of the Obama administration, Biden is heard saying, in part, that "we have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics."
The clip was first posted by RNC Research, a Twitter account operated by the Republican National Committee.
It's clear in context that Biden is talking about an effort to combat voter suppression and provide resources for those seeking to vote, not an organized effort to perpetrate voter fraud.
The clip is part of a longer response by the former Vice President to a two-part question from host Dan Pfeiffer about Biden's message to people who haven't voted and those who already have.
In his response, Biden encouraged people to "make a plan exactly how you're going to vote, where you're going to vote, when you're going to vote. Because it can get complicated, because the Republicans are doing everything they can to make it harder for people to vote, particularly people of color, to vote..."
He continued a few sentences later: "We have put together, I think, the most extensive and inclusive voter fraud organization in the history of American politics. What the President is trying to do is discourage people from voting by implying that their vote won't be counted, it can't be counted, we're going to challenge it..."
Biden goes to explain that his campaign has arranged for legal assistance for people who feel their right to vote has ben challenged.
On Saturday evening, White House Press Secretary Kayleigh McEnany posted the shortened clip from her personal Twitter account saying: "BIDEN ADMITS TO VOTER FRAUD!"
Fact-checking website Snopes debunked the claim as false.
McEnany's post has been retweeted more than 32,000 times. The clip has been viewed 7.9 million times on Twitter. Eric Trump also posted the video on both Twitter and Facebook without any false commentary.
President Trump's verified YouTube account also posted the clip, with the title: Joe Biden brags about having 'the most extensive and inclusive VOTER FRAUD organization' in history. It's been viewed nearly 500,000 times.
A Twitter spokesperson said it will not label the tweets by McEnany or Eric Trump.The social network did not provide further detail.
Facebook did not immediately respond to requests for comment, but the platform has not added any information labels or fact-checking resources to the clip.
According to Twitter's rules, users may not "deceptively share synthetic or manipulated media that are likely to cause harm." However, it's unclear if a clip taken out of context, but not technologically manipulated, would fall into this category.
Facebook's manipulated media policy states users should not post videothat has been "edited or synthesized ... in ways that are not apparent to an average person, and would likely mislead an average person to believe that a subject of the video said words that they did not say."
A YouTube spokesperson said the video does not violate its rules.
While the video shared with us by CNN does not violate our Community Guidelines,we have robust policies prohibiting deceptive practices such as technically manipulating content in a way that misleads users (beyond clips taken out of context) and may pose egregious harm." saidIvy Choi, a YouTube spokesperson.
The Trump campaign did not respond to a request for comment. Biden's national press secretary TJ Ducklo said: "The President of the United States has already demonstrated hes willing to lie and manipulate our countrys democratic process to help himself politically, which is why we have assembled the most robust and sophisticated team in presidential campaign history to confront voter suppression and fight voter fraud however it may present itself."
When asked if the RNC stood by the clipped video, and if its the official position of the RNC that Biden was endorsing and explicitly encouraging voter fraud, RNC Rapid Response Director Steve Guest said: You should ask Joe Biden if he stands by the words he uttered, not us for sharing them. It's not the RNC's responsibility to clarify for the Biden campaign their candidates repeated blunders."
From CNN Business' Kaya Yurieff and Rishi Iyengar
Facebook announced its latest crackdown on foreign actors trying to interfere in the US election.
On Tuesday, Facebook said it took down three different networks, two of which targeted the United States. The other originated in and targeted Myanmar.
Facebook said it identified and removed these networks before they were able to build up a substantial audience. The people within each network worked with each other and used fake accounts to mislead people about who they were, according to a blog post announcing the takedowns from Nathaniel Gleicher, Facebook's head of security policy.
The company announced it took action against three distinct networks. The first network consisted of two Facebook pages and 22 Instagram accounts and was taken down for violating Facebook's policy against foreign interference, which covers accounts from outside a particular country trying to influence behavior in that country. These accounts and pages were run by individuals from Mexico and Venezuela and targeted the United States. They posted in Spanish and English about US news and current events, including "memes and other content about humor, race relations and racial injustice, feminism and gender relations, environmental issues and religion," Gleicher said.
Facebook also removed 12 Facebook accounts, 6 pages and 11 Instagram accounts for government interference, with the company saying it found links to individuals associated with the Iranian government. That network started in Iran and primarily targeted the United States and Israel.
Facebook said the accounts focused on Saudi Arabia's activities in the Middle East and also spread claims about an alleged massacre.
A third network, comprising 9 Facebook accounts, 8 pages, two groups and two Instagram accounts, originated in Myanmar and targeted local audiences there. Its posts, mainly in Burmese, included criticism of Myanmar's armed forces, Facebook said.
The removals are part of Facebook's effort to crack down on "coordinated inauthentic behavior" and widespread misinformation, particularly leading up to the US presidential election.
Last month, the company said it had identified and shut down a network of fake accounts that included fictitious personas it said were tied to Russian military intelligence.
While those accounts had not been primarily targeting the United States, Facebook pointed to concerns that similar accounts could be used in Russian influence operations as the November 3 election draws closer.
"In recent weeks, government agencies, technology platforms and security experts have alerted the public to expect attempts to spread false information about the integrity of the election," Gleicher said in his blog post on Tuesday. "Were closely monitoring for potential scenarios where malicious actors around the world may use fictitious claims, including about compromised election infrastructure or inaccurate election outcomes, to suppress voter turnout or erode trust in the poll results."
See more here:
How Wikipedia will fight Election Day misinformation - nation.lk - The Nation Newspaper
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Roanoke Times - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- What we learned from Open AI whistleblower Suchir Balaji's Wikipedia Page - The Times of India - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- From an old version of the Wikipedia page for Warren G and N... - kottke.org - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - WCF Courier - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Encyclopedia of the Future: Why is Wikipedia Best Research Option? - Analytics Insight - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Most-Viewed Articles of 2024: Politics, Football, and...Death? - PCMag Middle East - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Taxiride Fallout Continues Over Alleged Amendments To Band Wikipedia Page - The Music - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Delhi High Court to examine Caravan, Ken articles to decide interim relief in ANI vs Wikipedia - Bar & Bench - Indian Legal News - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Boriswave Wikipedia page set up in reference to immigration surge under ex-PM - The London Economic - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Wikipedia suspends pro-Palestine editors coordinating efforts behind the scenes - The Jerusalem Post - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's 7-year yogurt spelling war was longer than three Shakespeare plays - Boing Boing - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia boyfriends on celebrating their mundane, anti-online corner of the internet - British GQ - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - York News-Times - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Most-Viewed Articles of 2024: Politics, Football, and...Death? - PCMag UK - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Martinsville Bulletin - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Death most popular thing on Wikipedia, again - Boing Boing - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Heres the top 25 list of most-viewed Wikipedia articles of 2024 - KXAN.com - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Here Are the Top 25 Wikipedia Searches for 2024 And #1 is BLEAK - Mediaite - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey hits out at Wikipedia for failing to set the record straight - The Independent - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Jimmy Wales on Why Wikipedia Is Still So Good - New York Magazine - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Here Are The 5 Most Read Wikipedia Pages In 2024 - The Spun - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia reveals its most searched posts - 97.1 The Ticket - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia just revealed what weve all been obsessing over in 2024 - Sherwood News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Terrible Towel Wikipedia page is a must-read yinzer masterpiece - PGH City Paper - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Most Popular Wikipedia Pages Of The Year - iHeart - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Neither Donald Trump nor Taylor Swift: This was the most-viewed Wikipedia page in the U.S. in 2024 - AS USA - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Winona Daily News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey Mad At Wikipedia, Claims He Was Never In The Nosebleeds Nor Slaughter And The Dogs - Stereogum - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Heres the top 25 list of most-viewed Wikipedia articles of 2024 - MSN - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Nosebleeds and Slaughter And The Dogs Band members list explored as Morrissey slams Wikipedia listing - Soap Central - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Diddy, Dune, and Donald Trump: The most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024 - STV News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- India's bollywood, elections, and IPL among top 10 most viewed articles on Wikipedia - The Tatva - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey says he has no connection with The Nosebleeds and Slaughter And The Dogs, despite claims on Wikipedia - NME - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia Called To Order By Samson Mow: The Urgency To Invest In Bitcoin - Cointribune EN - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and the ANI defamation suit | Explained - The Hindu - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- A Wikipedia for cells: researchers get an updated look at the Human Cell Atlas, and its remarkable - Nature.com - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- Opinion: Wikipedia has it out for Israel, and weve got the data to prove it - National Post - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- Who edits history? Politics and business in the pages of Wikipedia - EU Reporter - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- What your Wikipedia reading says about you: Study find different styles - The New Daily - November 14th, 2024 [November 14th, 2024]
- Going down a Wikipedia rabbit hole? Science says youre one of these three types - The Conversation - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Studying Wikipedia browsing habits to learn how people learn - Penn Today - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Portland mayor candidate Rene Gonzalez violated rules by using public funds on Wikipedia page, auditor finds - Oregon Public Broadcasting - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Top 5 Editing Conflicts in Wikipedia Pages on Religion - Baptist News Global - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Wikipedia editors form urgent task force to combat rampant issues with recent wave of content: 'The entire thing was ... [a] hoax' - Yahoo! Voices - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Audit: Rene Gonzalez violated campaign finance law by using city funds to edit Wikipedia page - Fox 12 Oregon - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Auditor: Gonzalez violated the law by paying to update his Wikipedia entry - Portland Tribune - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Musk Says Wikipedia Controlled By Far-Left Activists, Urges People To Stop Donating To Them! - News24 - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 Remake Wikipedia page locked after salty fans try to rewrite its critically-acclaimed reception - Eurogamer - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- The Silent Hill 2 Remakes Wikipedia page briefly got transformed into a phantasmagorical reflection of the psyches of idiots unable to accept reality... - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Outrage as Wikipedia changes grooming gangs article to moral panic from the 'Far-Right' - GB News - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 Falls Victim to Faux Review Bombing on Wikipedia - DualShockers - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- No, you're not losing it, Silent Hill 2 Remake's Wikipedia page's review scores have been altered, and the site has had to lock it to stop people... - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Exploring (and building) the depths of Wikipedia - The Michigan Daily - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and Catholicism: Navigating Misinformation and Religious Bias - World Religion News - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Weird things are happening on the Silent Hill 2 remake Wikipedia page, as folks sabotage review scores for reasons - Sports Illustrated - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 Remake Wikipedia Page Locked After Fans Tried to Change Reviews - Rely on Horror - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Trolls Edit Silent Hill 2 Remake Wikipedia Page To Lower Its Review Scores - PlayStation Universe - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- The Kremlin is rewriting Wikipedia - Hindustan Times - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Wikipedia Locks Silent Hill 2 Remake Page After It's Spammed With Fake Negative Reviews - TheGamer - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 remake Wikipedia locked after getting trolled - NME - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Wikimedia Technology Summit 2024 brings together tech enthusiasts and developers to bring inclusivity to Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects - Business... - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- AI's threat to Wikipedia - ABC News - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 remake page on Wikipedia blocked after fans try to rewrite critics' positive reviews - ITC - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Matt Walsh Recalls Critics Trying to Get Him Arrested Using Wikipedia - The Daily Wire - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and Religion: Uncovering the Dynamics of Reliable Sources and Digital Bias - Baptist News Global - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Wikipedia: Accuracy or Prejudice? Islamophobia in the Web 2.0 Era - World Religion News - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Ultrarunner Camille Herron is dumped by Lululemon after her husband edited her rivals' Wikipedia pages to boos - Daily Mail - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Ultrarunner Camille Herrons Primary Sponsor Drops Her After Wikipedia Scandal - Runner's World - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Ultrarunner Camille Herron dropped by Lululemon following Wikipedia editing controversy - Runner's World UK - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Wikipedia relies on army of volunteers as it stares down AI - Devex - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- This Ultramarathon Runner Was Dropped By A Major Sponsor Amid A Wikipedia Editing Scandal - Women's Health - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Wikipedia scandal: Heres why ultrarunner Camille Herron was dropped by Lululemon - Women's Agenda - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Guess The Wikipedia Footballer #4: Can you name these 10 footballers that played under Carlo Ancelotti? - Planet Football - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- ANI vs Wikipedia: The free encyclopedias impact on India and more - The Hindu - September 16th, 2024 [September 16th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and AI: Could artificial intelligence kill the online encyclopedia? - Newstalk - September 16th, 2024 [September 16th, 2024]
- Reliable Sources: How Wikipedia Admin David Gerard Launders His Grudges Into the Public Record - World Religion News - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Wikipedia and the Digital Services Act: Lessons on the strength of community and the future of internet regulation - Le Taurillon - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Depths Of Wikipedia: This Page Is Dedicated To The Weird Side Of Wikipedia (97 New Pics) - AOL - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Longest-Running Hoax Remained Online for Almost 10 Years: The Story of Jar'Edo Wens - The Journal - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- 40 Times People Found Such Hilarious Gems On Wikipedia, They Just Had To Share (New Pics) - Bored Panda - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]