We Need the Wisdom of Wikipedia – The LumberJack
Weve all been there. Youre sitting in a class. Your professor wants you to write a paper on the different types of asexual reproduction of the Sanderia malayensis jellyfish or some other arcane drivel. Your first reaction is to hit up Wikipedia. Then comes the kicker. You cant cite Wikipedia. You scowl and snarl under your breath.
Wikipedia is cool and it is useful. Turning a blind eye to Wikipedia as a reliable source is shortsighted and has implications beyond the realm of encyclopedias. Distrusting Wikipedia represents academias unwillingness to open the gates of collaborative truth-knowledge.
Scientific papers, meanwhile, are far from perfect.
Contrary to what your professors may tell you, Wikipedia, as a source, is statistically just as accurate as published encyclopedias for most of its content. A 2005 study by the Nature research journal, Internet encyclopaedias go head to head, found errors in both encyclopedias, but among the entries tested, the difference in accuracy was small.
Wikipedia, in their signature self-aware style, has reported on their own reliability as well. Wikipedia does not guarantee validity, but it is an invaluable research resource.
Inaccurate information on Wikipedia is usually corrected quickly. Hyperlinked citations back up nearly every claim made on an entry. The Sanderia malayensis jellyfishs page hosts six sources from international professionals, biologists and a handbook on poisonous jellies.
Scientific papers, meanwhile, are far from perfect. Soft sciences have suggested cures to unhappiness or boosts to confidence through simple behavioral change, but as other researchers try to replicate the experiments, their conclusions are significantly different. This indicates a serious error in the scientific method. If science isnt replicable, science is null.
In the last few years, a plethora of papers have fallen under criticism after researchers have failed to reproduce their resultsits been called the replication crisis. The crisis may have a few sources.
Mistakes happen on Wikipedia too and it is always essential to be critical of anything read.
First, its not hard to get published. The University of World News said in 2018 that too much scientific research is being published. It estimated nearly 30,000 scientific journals are in circulation, publishing approximately two million articles each year. They said the volume burdens the peer review system and makes it dysfunctional.
Second, the media likes to be the first to report on news, including science news. Journalists can be wrong and often are when it comes to reporting on science, especially when theyre grasping to be the first to report on new findings. These bad practices report inaccurate, unconfirmed, flawed science to their audience before the study can be replicated.
Mistakes happen on Wikipedia too and it is always essential to be critical of anything read. Search around, find supporting articles for any claim made and be aware that there may be flaws. But be able to recognize valid and sound knowledge.
Critical review by the editors of Wikipediawho can be any personis what makes Wikipedia so powerful and so accurate. Its the worlds largest encyclopediaabout 50 times larger than Britannicawith over six million entries and over 200,000 contributors. Wikipedia should serve as a banner for collaborationespecially between diverse groups.
In The wisdom of polarized crowds, a 2019 study from Nature Human Behavior, researchers found politically-diverse teams created more accurate entries than teams with less political diversity.
Wikipedia comes in clutch, often. Using it as a source may be frowned upon by professors, but a short chat with most of them and theyll say Wikipedia is an excellent place to start. The website is a tool, not a cheat code. It would be ignorant to ignore it, but if its used appropriately, maybe, just maybe, we could learn something about jellyfish.
Like Loading...
Read the original here:
We Need the Wisdom of Wikipedia - The LumberJack
- 21 Disturbing Wikipedia Pages About Unethical Experiments, Rare Deadly Diseases, And Other Nightmares - Yahoo Home - July 28th, 2025 [July 28th, 2025]
- Naomi Ackie has been trying to correct birthday on Wikipedia 'for years' - Film-News.co.uk - July 27th, 2025 [July 27th, 2025]
- Wikipedia editors, the internets nerdy unsung heroes, keep the website one of the last best places online - The Globe and Mail - July 27th, 2025 [July 27th, 2025]
- AI is eating leftist garbage from Wikipedia and YOU consume what comes out - New York Post - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia threatens to limit UK access to website - The Telegraph - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Pirate Software's Game Heartbound is Under Attack on Steam and Wikipedia - Sports Illustrated - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Like Wikipedia, Mastodon now shows a top banner urging you to donate to keep it alive - Neowin - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Five members of 11KBW in Wikipedia Online Safety Act challenge - 11KBW - July 24th, 2025 [July 24th, 2025]
- Wiki-Quantities and Wiki-Measurements: Datasets of quantities and their measurement context from Wikipedia - Nature - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- UK online legislation threat to operations,Wikipedia to argue in court - Euronews.com - July 22nd, 2025 [July 22nd, 2025]
- Exclusive | Why Mary-Louise Parker refuses to look at her Wikipedia page: Its bad - Page Six - July 14th, 2025 [July 14th, 2025]
- Opinion: How Wikipedia became one of the greatest inventions of the modern age - The Globe and Mail - July 12th, 2025 [July 12th, 2025]
- The Last of Us Part 2 has a 'chronological mode' now, in case you wanted to play through a story with all the finesse of a Wikipedia plot summary - PC... - July 10th, 2025 [July 10th, 2025]
- Many Wikipedia Articles Are Outdated or Incorrect - Yahoo - July 8th, 2025 [July 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Vs. Epistemic Insecurity: Why the World's Most Trusted Website Still Matters 06/30/2025 - MediaPost - July 2nd, 2025 [July 2nd, 2025]
- Mark O'Connell: I love Wikipedia so much, I hardly even minded when it killed me off - The Irish Times - June 29th, 2025 [June 29th, 2025]
- History of Wikipedia - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - June 28th, 2025 [June 28th, 2025]
- 60 Times Wikipedia Articles Were So Scary And Unsettling People Just Had To Know More - Bored Panda - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- 60 Times Wikipedia Articles Were So Scary And Unsettling People Just Had To Know More - inkl - June 24th, 2025 [June 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Is The Latest Place To Join The Daily Gaming Craze - Kotaku - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia Did What No One Expected: This Open Platform Just Proved Its Possible to Fight Back Against Powerful AI Systems - Rude Baguette - June 22nd, 2025 [June 22nd, 2025]
- Terrifying Survey Claims ChatGPT Has Overtaken Wikipedia - futurism.com - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia wants you to wear your love for an open internet on your sleeve - Fast Company - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia knew first? What really happened after Portnovs killing in Madrid - Euro Weekly News - May 24th, 2025 [May 24th, 2025]
- Can Wikipedia survive the rise of AI and the age of Donald Trump? - Australian Broadcasting Corporation - May 11th, 2025 [May 11th, 2025]
- Wikipedia fights the UKs flawed and burdensome online safety rules - The Verge - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Not courts duty to tell media to delete this and take that down: SC sets aside Delhi HCs order to take down page on ANI vs Wikipedia case - The Indian... - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Propaganda tool row: SC reverses Wikipedia takedown in ANI defamation case - Siasat.com - May 10th, 2025 [May 10th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is using (some) generative AI now - The Verge - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Jay-Z Accuses Attorney Of Wikipedia Manipulation In Legal Battle - Evrim Aac - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- US jurist accuses Wikipedia of disseminating propaganda and rewriting history - MSN - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Foundation Withdraws Appeal Before Delhi High Court Following Supreme Court Ruling - The Law Advice - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Generative AI will help Wikipedia editors moderate, translate, and onboard newcomers - the-decoder.com - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia will apply generative AI to support editors and reduce technical barriers - The Weekly Journal - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Wikipedia turns to generative AI to support its volunteer community - TechSpot - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- How is Wikipedia Progressive in the Age of AI? - Analytics Insight - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Members of Congress call on Wikipedia to curb its antisemitism - Israel National News - May 8th, 2025 [May 8th, 2025]
- Is Wikipedia in trouble? - London Evening Standard - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Has an Alter Ego Thats Obsessed With Questions. Everyone Should Browse It. - Slate - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- ANI vs Wikipedia: What the case is about and what has happened so far - Business Standard - April 12th, 2025 [April 12th, 2025]
- Delhi HC refuses to stay order asking Wikipedia to remove alleged defamatory description of ANI - The Economic Times - April 10th, 2025 [April 10th, 2025]
- The ADL says Wikipedia contains antisemitic bias, amid dispute over how the Israel-Hamas conflict is represented on the site - CNN - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- I Tried a TikTok-Style Version of Wikipedia, and It's Now My Favorite Way of Learning - MUO - MakeUseOf - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- How obscure is prospective Celtics buyer William Chisholm? He didnt have a Wikipedia page until Thursday. - The Boston Globe - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- How biased Wikipedia trashed Trumps nominees after he named them - New York Post - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Deconstructing Wikipedia: Its biased, lopsided and partisan - The Sunday Guardian - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- ADL report finds clear evidence of anti-Israel bias among Wikipedia editors - JNS.org - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- ADL: Anti-Israel Wikipedia editors colluding in anti-Israel bias on site - The Times of Israel - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- What happens when Wikipedia, Joe Biden, and Ms. Frizzle walk into a reality show? - Queen's Journal - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia posts updated to smear Patel, Hegseth, Gabbard: Watchdog - Washington Examiner - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- John Oliver Marvels at Wikipedia Page of Mel Gibson's Father: Somehow Your Son 'Is Not the Worst Thing About You' - TheWrap - March 22nd, 2025 [March 22nd, 2025]
- Wikipedia disrupted by edit wars to manipulate pages on war in Gaza with at least 14 editors banned: report - New York Post - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Volunteer photographers are fixing Wikipedia's terrible celebrity headshots - Engadget - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Photographers Are on a Mission to Fix Wikipedia's Famously Bad Celebrity Portraits - 404 Media - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia roiled with internal strife over page edits about the Middle East - Detroit News - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia has a huge gender equality problem heres why it matters - The Conversation Indonesia - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Co-founder: It's Not Neutral, Needs to Be Investigated - Newsmax - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Volunteer Photographers Tackle Terrible Celeb Headshots on Wikipedia - PCMag UK - March 13th, 2025 [March 13th, 2025]
- Bored? Check out the Museum of All Things and dive into Wikipedia in 3D - GamingOnLinux - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- This free interactive museum lets you explore Wikipedia like never before - Digital Trends - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- The Wild World of Wikipedia Speedrunning - LAFM - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder's open challenge to Musk: Which US govt branches 'paid to edit, monitor, update, lobby' the website? - Business Today - March 3rd, 2025 [March 3rd, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder may just have agreed with Elon Musk in his first viral post in a few years - The Times of India - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Elon Musk wants to change the name of Wikipedia $1 billion on the table to achieve it - Unin Rayo - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Wikipedia is now an endless 3D museum, and admission is free - Rock Paper Shotgun - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- This slick new service puts ChatGPT, Perplexity, and Wikipedia on the map - Fast Company - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- From agnostic to believer: Wikipedia co-founder publicly shares his testimony - CHVN Radio - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Wikipedia co-founder's request to Donald Trump and Elon Musk to probe the dubious website - OpIndia - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- User booked for adding content on Chhatrapati Sambhaji Maharaj on Wikipedia - The Times of India - February 27th, 2025 [February 27th, 2025]
- Remove derogatory and objectionable reference from Wikipedia about Sambhaji Maharaj: Fadnavis - Deccan Herald - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- 'There's limit to free speech': Fadnavis orders action against Wikipedia content - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Why these scientists devote time to editing and updating Wikipedia - Nature.com - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk's 'reminder' to Wikipedia: $1 billion offer for name change to ... still stands; come on, do .. - The Times of India - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Maharashtra CM directs cyber police to get objectionable content on Sambhaji Maharaj removed from Wikipedia - The Indian Express - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Elon Musk and Wikipedia are feuding - The Week - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia UnReliable Sources: Case Study How Wikipedia is Rigged to Prevent Balance When It Comes to Religious Articles - World Religion News - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Behind the Blog: Backdoors and the Miracle of Wikipedia - 404 Media - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- What if TikTok and Wikipedia had a baby? - The Washington Post - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- How Wikipedia Co-Founder Found Faith After 35 Years as a Nonbeliever - Movieguide - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]
- Wikipedia, Are You Ready? Musk's $1 Billion Name Change Offer Still On - Analytics Insight - February 20th, 2025 [February 20th, 2025]