Wikipedia controversy: Same old story – Daily Sabah
When compiling a list of websites that are considered the cornerstones of the World Wide Web, one of the first things that come to mind is, without a doubt, Wikipedia. Not only is it considered the holy grail of informational access, it is also regarded as a treasure trove of information and, when we consider the cursory background information regarding an event, the context of a word, a historical event or the history of a name, Wikipedia is usually the first thing that comes to mind.
But, why? Why is this site the first one to pop up during a search for information when there are other, more comprehensive websites that specialize in whatever topic peaks our curiosity? The answer is simple: Wikipedia uses search engine algorithms to their full capability. Not to mention that the numerous references on every page improves these odds.
However, does being the most visible source of information on the internet make Wikipedia the most trustworthy source? Does having a huge database of information make it the most reliable? Of course not. Wikipedia is an open source website that relies on its users for the collection of data, which means that it can also be very easily manipulated. Serving more as a compilation of information rather than a content creator, the majority of information available at Wikipedia is taken from other sources.
During the process of collecting this information, it is possible to encounter misinformation, causes for speculation and personal opinions of web editors and writers whose opinions are masqueraded as cold, hard facts.
The end of April was marked with controversy between Turkey and Wikipedia. After the website was blocked in Turkey, many users from the country expressed their displeasure on social media. While these naysayers were not entirely wrong to express their frustrations over the blocking of the website, it is important to consider all sides of the story before casting blame on one party or another.
After all, Wikipedia is, of course, an essential part of daily life for many people nowadays. According to statements issued by official sources, there were four reasons that compelled the blockage of Wikipedia in Turkey.
- Denial of Turkey's request for Wikipedia to open an office in Turkey
- Wikipedia's disregard for international law
- Wikipedia's disregard of Turkish court orders
- Wikipedia's abetting of anti-Turkey smear campaigns; whether intentional or unintentional
Now, while the said four reasons may have contributed to the government's decision, from the perspective of the rule of law, the fourth reason is the most important one that led to the current situation. It will also probably be the main reason that will untangle this controversy.
Wikipedia was blocked because it has recorded Turkey as a supporter of Daesh in numerous lists. When we look at the Turkish court order that led to the block, it refers to the listing of Turkey amid subtopics on pages regarding the foreign involvement in the Syrian civil war as well as state-sponsored terrorism.
One might say that since Wikipedia is an open source, Turkish users could simply correct the information without the need for court involvement or a ban. However, despite protests across Turkey and the resistance of Turkish editors on the site, the controversial section of Wikipedia which is spreading the lie that Turkey supports Daesh was put into protected mode, thus leaving it untouchable by Turkish users.
After Turkey blocked Wikipedia, the site challenged the court decision, appealing that the verdict be overturned.
Wikipedia founder Jimmy Wales tweeted that, "Access to information is a fundamental human right. Turkish people, I will always stand with you to fight for this right."
I have to say that considering the circumstances behind the situation, I find the tweet to be both funny and completely irrelevant; not to mention a bit familiar because the tweet itself, along with numerous articles published by Western media on the subject, are trying to paint this as a government crackdown on human rights or, even worse, as the tip of the iceberg in a banning frenzy in Turkey.
Considering that Turkey was the slandered party here, painting the country as the instigator can only be referred to as manipulation at worst and, at best, blatant disregard for the facts.
This is not about human rights. This is about international and national law with a dose of corporate policies. This was not the first time Turkey has been caught in the crosshairs of being portrayed as the big bad wolf who reared his ugly head against innocent, conglomerate internet companies.
I am sure many readers can recall other Twitter controversies in recent years. Twitter and Western media have followed suit by initially declaring the issue an "undemocratic crackdown on fundamental, communicative rights." However, the end result was finding a compromise between national and international laws, and corporate policy.
So, in the end, the most logical roadmap for Wikipedia moving forward should include a compromise and adherence to quality; in other words, Wikipedia should make it a priority to not allow their site to be used as a tool for slander and manipulation against Turkey, or any country for that matter.
Link:
Wikipedia controversy: Same old story - Daily Sabah
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Roanoke Times - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- What we learned from Open AI whistleblower Suchir Balaji's Wikipedia Page - The Times of India - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- From an old version of the Wikipedia page for Warren G and N... - kottke.org - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - WCF Courier - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Encyclopedia of the Future: Why is Wikipedia Best Research Option? - Analytics Insight - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Most-Viewed Articles of 2024: Politics, Football, and...Death? - PCMag Middle East - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Taxiride Fallout Continues Over Alleged Amendments To Band Wikipedia Page - The Music - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Delhi High Court to examine Caravan, Ken articles to decide interim relief in ANI vs Wikipedia - Bar & Bench - Indian Legal News - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Boriswave Wikipedia page set up in reference to immigration surge under ex-PM - The London Economic - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Wikipedia suspends pro-Palestine editors coordinating efforts behind the scenes - The Jerusalem Post - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's 7-year yogurt spelling war was longer than three Shakespeare plays - Boing Boing - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia boyfriends on celebrating their mundane, anti-online corner of the internet - British GQ - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - York News-Times - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Most-Viewed Articles of 2024: Politics, Football, and...Death? - PCMag UK - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Martinsville Bulletin - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Death most popular thing on Wikipedia, again - Boing Boing - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Heres the top 25 list of most-viewed Wikipedia articles of 2024 - KXAN.com - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Here Are the Top 25 Wikipedia Searches for 2024 And #1 is BLEAK - Mediaite - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey hits out at Wikipedia for failing to set the record straight - The Independent - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Jimmy Wales on Why Wikipedia Is Still So Good - New York Magazine - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Here Are The 5 Most Read Wikipedia Pages In 2024 - The Spun - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia reveals its most searched posts - 97.1 The Ticket - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia just revealed what weve all been obsessing over in 2024 - Sherwood News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Terrible Towel Wikipedia page is a must-read yinzer masterpiece - PGH City Paper - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Most Popular Wikipedia Pages Of The Year - iHeart - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Neither Donald Trump nor Taylor Swift: This was the most-viewed Wikipedia page in the U.S. in 2024 - AS USA - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Winona Daily News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey Mad At Wikipedia, Claims He Was Never In The Nosebleeds Nor Slaughter And The Dogs - Stereogum - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Heres the top 25 list of most-viewed Wikipedia articles of 2024 - MSN - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Nosebleeds and Slaughter And The Dogs Band members list explored as Morrissey slams Wikipedia listing - Soap Central - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Diddy, Dune, and Donald Trump: The most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024 - STV News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- India's bollywood, elections, and IPL among top 10 most viewed articles on Wikipedia - The Tatva - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey says he has no connection with The Nosebleeds and Slaughter And The Dogs, despite claims on Wikipedia - NME - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia Called To Order By Samson Mow: The Urgency To Invest In Bitcoin - Cointribune EN - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and the ANI defamation suit | Explained - The Hindu - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- A Wikipedia for cells: researchers get an updated look at the Human Cell Atlas, and its remarkable - Nature.com - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- Opinion: Wikipedia has it out for Israel, and weve got the data to prove it - National Post - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- Who edits history? Politics and business in the pages of Wikipedia - EU Reporter - November 23rd, 2024 [November 23rd, 2024]
- What your Wikipedia reading says about you: Study find different styles - The New Daily - November 14th, 2024 [November 14th, 2024]
- Going down a Wikipedia rabbit hole? Science says youre one of these three types - The Conversation - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Studying Wikipedia browsing habits to learn how people learn - Penn Today - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Portland mayor candidate Rene Gonzalez violated rules by using public funds on Wikipedia page, auditor finds - Oregon Public Broadcasting - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Top 5 Editing Conflicts in Wikipedia Pages on Religion - Baptist News Global - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Wikipedia editors form urgent task force to combat rampant issues with recent wave of content: 'The entire thing was ... [a] hoax' - Yahoo! Voices - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Audit: Rene Gonzalez violated campaign finance law by using city funds to edit Wikipedia page - Fox 12 Oregon - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Auditor: Gonzalez violated the law by paying to update his Wikipedia entry - Portland Tribune - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Musk Says Wikipedia Controlled By Far-Left Activists, Urges People To Stop Donating To Them! - News24 - October 26th, 2024 [October 26th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 Remake Wikipedia page locked after salty fans try to rewrite its critically-acclaimed reception - Eurogamer - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- The Silent Hill 2 Remakes Wikipedia page briefly got transformed into a phantasmagorical reflection of the psyches of idiots unable to accept reality... - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Outrage as Wikipedia changes grooming gangs article to moral panic from the 'Far-Right' - GB News - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 Falls Victim to Faux Review Bombing on Wikipedia - DualShockers - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- No, you're not losing it, Silent Hill 2 Remake's Wikipedia page's review scores have been altered, and the site has had to lock it to stop people... - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Exploring (and building) the depths of Wikipedia - The Michigan Daily - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and Catholicism: Navigating Misinformation and Religious Bias - World Religion News - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Weird things are happening on the Silent Hill 2 remake Wikipedia page, as folks sabotage review scores for reasons - Sports Illustrated - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 Remake Wikipedia Page Locked After Fans Tried to Change Reviews - Rely on Horror - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Trolls Edit Silent Hill 2 Remake Wikipedia Page To Lower Its Review Scores - PlayStation Universe - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- The Kremlin is rewriting Wikipedia - Hindustan Times - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Wikipedia Locks Silent Hill 2 Remake Page After It's Spammed With Fake Negative Reviews - TheGamer - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 remake Wikipedia locked after getting trolled - NME - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Wikimedia Technology Summit 2024 brings together tech enthusiasts and developers to bring inclusivity to Wikipedia and Wikimedia projects - Business... - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- AI's threat to Wikipedia - ABC News - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Silent Hill 2 remake page on Wikipedia blocked after fans try to rewrite critics' positive reviews - ITC - October 9th, 2024 [October 9th, 2024]
- Matt Walsh Recalls Critics Trying to Get Him Arrested Using Wikipedia - The Daily Wire - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and Religion: Uncovering the Dynamics of Reliable Sources and Digital Bias - Baptist News Global - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Wikipedia: Accuracy or Prejudice? Islamophobia in the Web 2.0 Era - World Religion News - October 4th, 2024 [October 4th, 2024]
- Ultrarunner Camille Herron is dumped by Lululemon after her husband edited her rivals' Wikipedia pages to boos - Daily Mail - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Ultrarunner Camille Herrons Primary Sponsor Drops Her After Wikipedia Scandal - Runner's World - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Ultrarunner Camille Herron dropped by Lululemon following Wikipedia editing controversy - Runner's World UK - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Wikipedia relies on army of volunteers as it stares down AI - Devex - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- This Ultramarathon Runner Was Dropped By A Major Sponsor Amid A Wikipedia Editing Scandal - Women's Health - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Wikipedia scandal: Heres why ultrarunner Camille Herron was dropped by Lululemon - Women's Agenda - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- Guess The Wikipedia Footballer #4: Can you name these 10 footballers that played under Carlo Ancelotti? - Planet Football - October 3rd, 2024 [October 3rd, 2024]
- ANI vs Wikipedia: The free encyclopedias impact on India and more - The Hindu - September 16th, 2024 [September 16th, 2024]
- Wikipedia and AI: Could artificial intelligence kill the online encyclopedia? - Newstalk - September 16th, 2024 [September 16th, 2024]
- Reliable Sources: How Wikipedia Admin David Gerard Launders His Grudges Into the Public Record - World Religion News - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Wikipedia and the Digital Services Act: Lessons on the strength of community and the future of internet regulation - Le Taurillon - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Depths Of Wikipedia: This Page Is Dedicated To The Weird Side Of Wikipedia (97 New Pics) - AOL - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Longest-Running Hoax Remained Online for Almost 10 Years: The Story of Jar'Edo Wens - The Journal - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]
- 40 Times People Found Such Hilarious Gems On Wikipedia, They Just Had To Share (New Pics) - Bored Panda - August 31st, 2024 [August 31st, 2024]