Column: 'Compromise' is not a dirty word

Compromise has always been a holy word for the Washington establishment. But against the backdrop of ever-increasing anxiety over our fiscal dysfunction, most particularly the next budget showdown, the word has taken on a tone of anger, desperation and even panic.

By Mandel Ngan, AFP/Getty Images

Not eye-to-eye: House Republican leader John Boehner and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi.

By Mandel Ngan, AFP/Getty Images

Not eye-to-eye: House Republican leader John Boehner and House Democratic leader Nancy Pelosi.

Columns

In addition to its own editorials, USA TODAY publishes a variety of opinions from outside writers. On political and policy matters, we publish opinions from across the political spectrum.

Roughly half of our columns come from our Board of Contributors, a group whose interests range from education to religion to sports to the economy. Their charge is to chronicle American culture by telling the stories, large and small, that collectively make us what we are.

We also publish weekly columns by Al Neuharth, USA TODAY's founder, and DeWayne Wickham, who writes primarily on matters of race but on other subjects as well. That leaves plenty of room for other views from across the nation by well-known and lesser-known names alike.

But in all its usages these days, "compromise" remains a word for bludgeoning Republicans. "Congress isn't just stalemated, it's broken, experts say," proclaims the typical headline, this one in TheMiami Herald. And the experts say it's all the Republicans' fault.

Excerpt from:
Column: 'Compromise' is not a dirty word

Related Posts

Comments are closed.