Link Rot and Digital Decay on Government, News and Other Webpages – Pew Research Center
Pew Research Center conducted the analysis to examine how often online content that once existed becomes inaccessible. One part of the study looks at a representative sample of webpages that existed over the past decade to see how many are still accessible today. For this analysis, we collected a sample of pages from the Common Crawl web repository for each year from 2013 to 2023. We then tried to access those pages to see how many still exist.
A second part of the study looks at the links on existing webpages to see how many of those links are still functional. We did this by collecting a large sample of pages from government websites, news websites and the online encyclopedia Wikipedia.
We identified relevant news domains using data from the audience metrics company comScore and relevant government domains (at multiple levels of government) using data from get.gov, the official administrator for the .gov domain. We collected the news and government pages via Common Crawl and the Wikipedia pages from an archive maintained by the Wikimedia Foundation. For each collection, we identified the links on those pages and followed them to their destination to see what share of those links point to sites that are no longer accessible.
A third part of the study looks at how often individual posts on social media sites are deleted or otherwise removed from public view. We did this by collecting a large sample of public tweets on the social media platform X (then known as Twitter) in real time using the Twitter Streaming API. We then tracked the status of those tweets for a period of three months using the Twitter Search API to monitor how many were still publicly available. Refer to the report methodology for more details.
The internet is an unimaginably vast repository of modern life, with hundreds of billions of indexed webpages. But even as users across the world rely on the web to access books, images, news articles and other resources, this content sometimes disappears from view.
A new Pew Research Center analysis shows just how fleeting online content actually is:
This digital decay occurs in many different online spaces. We examined the links that appear on government and news websites, as well as in the References section of Wikipedia pages as of spring 2023. This analysis found that:
To see how digital decay plays out on social media, we also collected a real-time sample of tweets during spring 2023 on the social media platform X (then known as Twitter) and followed them for three months. We found that:
There are many ways of defining whether something on the internet that used to exist is now inaccessible to people trying to reach it today. For instance, inaccessible could mean that:
For this report, we focused on the first of these: pages that no longer exist. The other definitions of accessibility are beyond the scope of this research.
Our approach is a straightforward way of measuring whether something online is accessible or not. But even so, there is some ambiguity.
First, there are dozens of status codes indicating a problem that a user might encounter when they try to access a page. Not all of them definitively indicate whether the page is permanently defunct or just temporarily unavailable. Second, for security reasons, many sites actively try to prevent the sort of automated data collection that we used to test our full list of links.
For these reasons, we used the most conservative estimate possible for deciding whether a site was actually accessible or not. We counted pages as inaccessible only if they returned one of nine error codes that definitively indicate that the page and/or its host server no longer exist or have become nonfunctional regardless of how they are being accessed, and by whom. The full list of error codes that we included in our definition are in the methodology.
Here are some of the findings from our analysis of digital decay in various online spaces.
To conduct this part of our analysis, we collected a random sample of just under 1 million webpages from the archives of Common Crawl, an internet archive service that periodically collects snapshots of the internet as it exists at different points in time. We sampled pages collected by Common Crawl each year from 2013 through 2023 (approximately 90,000 pages per year) and checked to see if those pages still exist today.
We found that 25% of all the pages we collected from 2013 through 2023 were no longer accessible as of October 2023. This figure is the sum of two different types of broken pages: 16% of pages are individually inaccessible but come from an otherwise functional root-level domain; the other 9% are inaccessible because their entire root domain is no longer functional.
Not surprisingly, the older snapshots in our collection had the largest share of inaccessible links. Of the pages collected from the 2013 snapshot, 38% were no longer accessible in 2023. But even for pages collected in the 2021 snapshot, about one-in-five were no longer accessible just two years later.
We sampled around 500,000 pages from government websites using the Common Crawl March/April 2023 snapshot of the internet, including a mix of different levels of government (federal, state, local and others). We found every link on each page and followed a random selection of those links to their destination to see if the pages they refer to still exist.
Across the government websites we sampled, there were 42 million links. The vast majority of those links (86%) were internal, meaning they link to a different page on the same website. An explainer resource on the IRS website that links to other documents or forms on the IRS site would be an example of an internal link.
Around three-quarters of government webpages we sampled contained at least one on-page link. The typical (median) page contains 50 links, but many pages contain far more. A page in the 90th percentile contains 190 links, and a page in the 99th percentile (that is, the top 1% of pages by number of links) has 740 links.
Other facts about government webpage links:
When we followed these links, we found that 6% point to pages that are no longer accessible. Similar shares of internal and external links are no longer functional.
Overall, 21% of all the government webpages we examined contained at least one broken link. Across every level of government we looked at, there were broken links on at least 14% of pages; city government pages had the highest rates of broken links.
For this analysis, we sampled 500,000 pages from 2,063 websites classified as News/Information by the audience metrics firm comScore. The pages were collected from the Common Crawl March/April 2023 snapshot of the internet.
Across the news sites sampled, this collection contained more than 14 million links pointing to an outside website. Some 94% of these pages contain at least one external-facing link. The median page contains 20 links, and pages in the top 10% by link count have 56 links.
Like government websites, the vast majority of these links go to secure HTTP pages (those with a URL beginning with https://). Around 12% of links on these news sites point to a static file, like a PDF document. And 32% of links on news sites redirected to a different URL than the one they originally pointed to slightly less than the 39% of external links on government sites that redirect.
When we tracked these links to their destination, we found that 5% of all links on news site pages are no longer accessible. And 23% of all the pages we sampled contained at least one broken link.
Broken links are about as prevalent on the most-trafficked news websites as they are on the least-trafficked sites. Some 25% of pages on news websites in the top 20% by site traffic have at least one broken link. That is nearly identical to the 26% of sites in the bottom 20% by site traffic.
For this analysis, we collected a random sample of 50,000 English-language Wikipedia pages and examined the links in their References section. The vast majority of these pages (82%) contain at least one reference link that is, one that directs the reader to a webpage other than Wikipedia itself.
In total, there are just over 1 million reference links across all the pages we collected. The typical page has four reference links.
The analysis indicates that 11% of all references linked on Wikipedia are no longer accessible. On about 2% of source pages containing reference links, every link on the page was broken or otherwise inaccessible, while another 53% of pages contained at least one broken link.
For this analysis, we collected nearly 5 million tweets posted from March 8 to April 27, 2023, on the social media platform X, which at the time was known as Twitter. We did this using Twitters Streaming API, collecting 3,000 public tweets every 30 minutes in real time. This provided us with a representative sample of all tweets posted on the platform during that period. We monitored those tweets until June 15, 2023, and checked each day to see if they were still available on the site or not.
At the end of the observation period, we found that 18% of the tweets from our initial collection window were no longer publicly visible on the site. In a majority of cases, this was because the account that originally posted the tweet was made private, suspended or deleted entirely. For the remaining tweets, the account that posted the tweet was still visible on the site, but the individual tweet had been deleted.
Tweets were especially likely to be deleted or removed over the course of our collection period if they were:
We also found that removed or deleted tweets tended to come from newer accounts with relatively few followers and modest activityon the site. On average, tweets that were no longer visible on the site were posted by accounts around eight months younger than those whose tweets stayed on the site.
And when we analyzed the types of tweets that were no longer available, we found that retweets, quote tweets and original tweets did not differ much from the overall average. But replies were relatively unlikely to be removed just 12% of replies were inaccessible at the end of our monitoring period.
Most tweets that are removed from the site tend to disappear soon after being posted. In addition to looking at how many tweets from our collection were still available at the end of our tracking period, we conducted a survival analysis to see how long these tweets tended to remain available. We found that:
Put another way: Half of tweets that are eventually removed from the platform are unavailable within the first six days of being posted. And 90% of these tweets are unavailable within 46 days.
Tweets dont always disappear forever, though. Some 6% of the tweets we collected disappeared and then became available again at a later point. This could be due to an account going private and then returning to public status, or to the account being suspended and later reinstated. Of those reappeared tweets, the vast majority (90%) were still accessible on Twitter at the end of the monitoring period.
Link:
Link Rot and Digital Decay on Government, News and Other Webpages - Pew Research Center
- Edit wars over Israel spur rare ban of 8 Wikipedia editors from both sides - JTA News - Jewish Telegraphic Agency - January 24th, 2025 [January 24th, 2025]
- Elon Musk furious after Wikipedia page calls his controversial gesture a Nazi salute - The Independent - January 24th, 2025 [January 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia UnReliable Sources: Who Are These Editors and Admins Who Define Reality for the Rest of Us? - World Religion News - January 24th, 2025 [January 24th, 2025]
- EasyJet founder used YouTube and Wikipedia in doomed trademark battle - The Times - January 24th, 2025 [January 24th, 2025]
- 'Elon is unhappy that Wikipedia is not for sale', says co-founder Jimmy Wales after Musk repeats call to defu - Indiatimes.com - January 24th, 2025 [January 24th, 2025]
- Elon Musk calls out Wikipedia an "extension of legacy media propaganda" for referencing the debate over his "Nazi" salute -... - January 24th, 2025 [January 24th, 2025]
- Elon Musk is now demanding action against Wikipedia following inauguration gesture fallout - indy100 - January 24th, 2025 [January 24th, 2025]
- He is the worlds leading free speech hypocrite: Elon Musks battle with Wikipedia is part of his war on truth - Yahoo! Voices - January 24th, 2025 [January 24th, 2025]
- Elon Musk is now demanding action against Wikipedia following inauguration gesture fallout - MSN - January 24th, 2025 [January 24th, 2025]
- Boyfriend Only Really Needs Constant Access To Wikipedia/Google Maps And He's All Sweet - The Betoota Advocate - January 24th, 2025 [January 24th, 2025]
- Wikipedia's most-read article of 2024 was about the year's deaths - Boing Boing - January 22nd, 2025 [January 22nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk lashes out at Wikipedia over 'Nazi salute' claims at Trump's inauguration as he calls for site to be defunded - The US Sun - January 22nd, 2025 [January 22nd, 2025]
- Elon Musk and the Heritage Foundation Put WIKIPEDIA In Their Crosshairs - Daily Kos - January 22nd, 2025 [January 22nd, 2025]
- Anti-Israel Wikipedia editors face ban for 'misinformation and hate' - The Times of India - January 22nd, 2025 [January 22nd, 2025]
- Al Murray: I could be the Duke of Atholl or so Wikipedia said - The Times - January 22nd, 2025 [January 22nd, 2025]
- ADL: Wikipedia bans several editors for spreading antisemitic rhetoric, misinformation on Gaza war - The Times of Israel - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Bigg Boss 18 GRAND FINALE: Wikipedia Reveals The Name Of Possible WINNER; And It's Not Vivian Dsena - News24 - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- BB 18's Winner's Name Gets Leaked Ahead Of Salman Declaring It? Wikipedia's Information Goes Viral - BollywoodShaadis.com - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- Bigg Boss 18 Winner LEAKED? Wikipedia Says THIS Finalist Will Win The Show - Times Now - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- ADL: Wikipedia bans several editors for spreading antisemitic rhetoric, misinformation on Gaza war - Jewish News - January 19th, 2025 [January 19th, 2025]
- AI giant's Desi CEO says pretty clear Wikipedia is biased; wants to build 'neutral and unbiased: Wikipe - The Times of India - January 15th, 2025 [January 15th, 2025]
- In a minefield of glitchy AI search and social media, Wikipedia becomes one of the most reliable places on the internet - CNN - January 15th, 2025 [January 15th, 2025]
- How to politicize the truth on Facebook, Instagram, and Wikipedia - The Guardian - January 15th, 2025 [January 15th, 2025]
- The Case for a Decentralized Wikipedia Is Overwhelming Whos Going to Build It? | Bitcoinist.com - Bitcoinist - January 15th, 2025 [January 15th, 2025]
- Joys & Woes of Wikipedia 1-15-25 The Village - Daily Kos - January 15th, 2025 [January 15th, 2025]
- "How? They've been asking for $1 for 84 years"- Internet reacts as Wikipedia turns 24 - Sportskeeda - January 15th, 2025 [January 15th, 2025]
- Wikipedia Turns 24: Here's How The People's Encyclopedia Has Evolved Over The Years - ABP Live - January 15th, 2025 [January 15th, 2025]
- Someone Updated Wikipedia To Say Alan Jackson Is Zach Top's Father After Hilarious Theory - Wide Open Country - January 15th, 2025 [January 15th, 2025]
- Scoop: Heritage Foundation plans to identify and target Wikipedia editors - Forward - January 7th, 2025 [January 7th, 2025]
- Meet the Nunavut grandpa who has made over 250,000 Wikipedia edits - CBC.ca - January 7th, 2025 [January 7th, 2025]
- Wikipedia fights off boredom with pencil fighting, paint drying, and Ray Bradbury - The A.V. Club - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Wikipedia works as a tool for propaganda: Read how ex-CEO of Wikimedia Foundation conceded that information on the free encyclopedia is not based on... - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Elon Musk's Attack on Wikipedia; Cats and the Threat of Bird Flu-Coachella Valley Independent's Indy Digest: Dec. 26, 2024 - Coachella Valley... - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Explained: Why Elon Musk's $1 billion offer to rename Wikipedia sparks debate - India Today - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Elon Musk Reiterates Offer of $1 Billion to Rename Wikipedia to "Dickipedia" | Firstpost America - Firstpost - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Explaining the right: Why Musk and MAGA are so mad at Wikipedia - Daily Kos - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Elon Musk says his $1 billion offer to Wikipedia still stands - The Times of India - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- When ex-CEO of Wikimedia Foundation Katherine Maher spilled the 'truth' about Wikipedia - OpIndia - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Elon Musk reaffirms $1 billion offer to rename Wikipedia - News.Az - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Elon Musk says he's still ready to pay Wikipedia $1 billion if it changes its name to... - Moneycontrol - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Elon Musk calls for an end to donations to Wikipedia because of DEI initiatives - Gamereactor UK - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Elon Musks $1 Billion Offer to Wikipedia Still Stands - The Economic Times - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- 'I am still ready to pay Wikipedia $1 billion if it changes its name to Dickipedia', says Elon Musk - Indian Startup News - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Elon Musk calls Wikipedia 'woke' and urges boycott - Notebookcheck.net - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Elon Musk Says His $1 Billion Offer For Wikipedia To Change Its Name 'Still Stands' - News18 - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- Elon Musk says $1 billion offer to rename Wikipedia still stands - The London Economic - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- 'Father of ...': Sam Konstas' Wikipedia page gets doctored after onslaught against India at MCG - The Times of India - January 1st, 2025 [January 1st, 2025]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Roanoke Times - December 22nd, 2024 [December 22nd, 2024]
- What we learned from Open AI whistleblower Suchir Balaji's Wikipedia Page - The Times of India - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- From an old version of the Wikipedia page for Warren G and N... - kottke.org - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - WCF Courier - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Encyclopedia of the Future: Why is Wikipedia Best Research Option? - Analytics Insight - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Most-Viewed Articles of 2024: Politics, Football, and...Death? - PCMag Middle East - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Taxiride Fallout Continues Over Alleged Amendments To Band Wikipedia Page - The Music - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Delhi High Court to examine Caravan, Ken articles to decide interim relief in ANI vs Wikipedia - Bar & Bench - Indian Legal News - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Boriswave Wikipedia page set up in reference to immigration surge under ex-PM - The London Economic - December 18th, 2024 [December 18th, 2024]
- Wikipedia suspends pro-Palestine editors coordinating efforts behind the scenes - The Jerusalem Post - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's 7-year yogurt spelling war was longer than three Shakespeare plays - Boing Boing - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia boyfriends on celebrating their mundane, anti-online corner of the internet - British GQ - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - York News-Times - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Wikipedia's Most-Viewed Articles of 2024: Politics, Football, and...Death? - PCMag UK - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Martinsville Bulletin - December 14th, 2024 [December 14th, 2024]
- Death most popular thing on Wikipedia, again - Boing Boing - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Heres the top 25 list of most-viewed Wikipedia articles of 2024 - KXAN.com - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Here Are the Top 25 Wikipedia Searches for 2024 And #1 is BLEAK - Mediaite - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey hits out at Wikipedia for failing to set the record straight - The Independent - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Jimmy Wales on Why Wikipedia Is Still So Good - New York Magazine - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Here Are The 5 Most Read Wikipedia Pages In 2024 - The Spun - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia reveals its most searched posts - 97.1 The Ticket - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Wikipedia just revealed what weve all been obsessing over in 2024 - Sherwood News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Terrible Towel Wikipedia page is a must-read yinzer masterpiece - PGH City Paper - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Most Popular Wikipedia Pages Of The Year - iHeart - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Neither Donald Trump nor Taylor Swift: This was the most-viewed Wikipedia page in the U.S. in 2024 - AS USA - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- What were the most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024? - Winona Daily News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey Mad At Wikipedia, Claims He Was Never In The Nosebleeds Nor Slaughter And The Dogs - Stereogum - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Heres the top 25 list of most-viewed Wikipedia articles of 2024 - MSN - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- The Nosebleeds and Slaughter And The Dogs Band members list explored as Morrissey slams Wikipedia listing - Soap Central - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Diddy, Dune, and Donald Trump: The most popular Wikipedia pages of 2024 - STV News - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- India's bollywood, elections, and IPL among top 10 most viewed articles on Wikipedia - The Tatva - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]
- Morrissey says he has no connection with The Nosebleeds and Slaughter And The Dogs, despite claims on Wikipedia - NME - December 5th, 2024 [December 5th, 2024]